:( I want VTOL surfaces....
second entry
If only one is valid, keep the Ruby
@Titansteam Really thanks! :)
@mixhaelr Thanks :D
@JAMBO Thanks mate.
@TheJohnnyMan Just uploaded a Mobile Friendly version
My enter:
GA-19 Ruby
It fly quite well, try it. ;) Not a fighter, but for a General Aviation, a very good handling.
NO XML EDITING! :D Fully legit plane! ;)
@TheJohnnyMan thanks dude :)
Right
UP.. no one want to give his opinion? :(
I like it too! :D
Try those two, and tell me if you see the problem. I'm not sure to understand...
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/oCUa6Y/PFB-2-Sparrow https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/irT592/THE-THING
Is "Push Pull" valid?
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Zc510d/BALDO-PUSH-PULL
Try smaller diameter, but more blades (6). It probably will work
Interesting... i'm follow this post
@Average3323 680 knots and a pilot jammer turn rate :)
UP
@ValtsuAircraftIndustries Easier, and less bulky with design advantages
Yes, but with double mass. And... the game is "simple" planes, not "glitched" planes :D
@LolDCreadorelo Thanks! :D
@jsaret Another good solution... :D
We are all with you, dude. Fight with all your force.
I agree
Guys, upvote if you want a rounded air intake too...
OK, is only go down a lot in few minus. Sorry
Look at mine.. ;)
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/9Faluz/THRUST-C
Please, let us post some more pkanes/day for a couple of days when the server return up.... thanks :)
Amazing, mate. :)
So... it's a server prblem. OK.
@Brields95 want you give an eye on my "variable geometry" and "the thing" and tell me what you think about how they fly and the look? Thanks :)
@Brields95 there is a little bit of F-101 too, but this one is more sleek :)
:( I want VTOL surfaces....
second entry
If only one is valid, keep the Ruby
@Titansteam Really thanks! :)
@mixhaelr Thanks :D
@JAMBO Thanks mate.
@TheJohnnyMan Just uploaded a Mobile Friendly version
My enter:
GA-19 Ruby
It fly quite well, try it. ;) Not a fighter, but for a General Aviation, a very good handling.
NO XML EDITING! :D Fully legit plane! ;)
@TheJohnnyMan thanks dude :)
Right
UP.. no one want to give his opinion? :(
I like it too! :D
Try those two, and tell me if you see the problem. I'm not sure to understand...
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/oCUa6Y/PFB-2-Sparrow
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/irT592/THE-THING
Is "Push Pull" valid?
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Zc510d/BALDO-PUSH-PULL
Try smaller diameter, but more blades (6). It probably will work
Interesting... i'm follow this post
@Average3323 680 knots and a pilot jammer turn rate :)
UP
UP
@ValtsuAircraftIndustries Easier, and less bulky with design advantages
Yes, but with double mass. And... the game is "simple" planes, not "glitched" planes :D
@LolDCreadorelo Thanks! :D
@jsaret Another good solution... :D
We are all with you, dude. Fight with all your force.
I agree
Guys, upvote if you want a rounded air intake too...
OK, is only go down a lot in few minus. Sorry
Look at mine.. ;)
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/9Faluz/THRUST-C
Please, let us post some more pkanes/day for a couple of days when the server return up.... thanks :)
I agree
Amazing, mate. :)
So... it's a server prblem. OK.
@Brields95 want you give an eye on my "variable geometry" and "the thing" and tell me what you think about how they fly and the look? Thanks :)
@Brields95 there is a little bit of F-101 too, but this one is more sleek :)