2,238 BaconBandit55 Comments

  • fox II 5.8 years ago

    Tanks are difficult. Took me a while til I made one worthy of posting. Nice job. Maybe you can cover the tracks some more for your next one?

    +1
  • Me.262B-1a Schwalbe 5.8 years ago

    @Eggplant I figured. The real reason was that I was beginning to become a little irritated after just the iron cross and I tried a swastika once and it was the most annoying, inane part of building it. I figured I would just keep the part count low. Thanks anyways!

  • Me.262B-1a/U1 Schwalbe 5.8 years ago

    @Storm41 Thanks!

  • CraLS Messerschmitt Me-262 Night Fighter 5.8 years ago

    @Storm41 The engines with afterburners create a less realistic exhaust and for being a night fighter, it has a lot of air to ground weaponry. 9ther than that though it looks fine. Interesting seeing the differences in how we went about creating our versions of it. Nice work!

  • B-29 Bomber READ DEC. 5.8 years ago

    Nice work! A comment about the wings would be redundant at this point, but other than that, it looks great. I imagine the nose took up a disproportionate amount of time to build

  • Me.262B-1a Schwalbe 5.8 years ago

    @Storm41 Just uploaded it. It's basically the same thing, but handling is a little worse

  • Me.262B-1a Schwalbe 5.8 years ago

    @Storm41 Thanks. Now I want to upload the night fighter version I did before uploading this. I was just dissatisfied with it, but why not?

  • Me.262B-1a Schwalbe 5.8 years ago

    @CRJ900Pilot oh, sweet! I just now noticed that. Glad you like it

  • M7A1 MacArthur 6.0 years ago

    @Dylanspin the hull was very well done though.

  • M7A1 MacArthur 6.0 years ago

    @randomusername No, in fact I really appreciate it. I'm already working some fixes and will be back in about half an hour with the A2 using some of the advice you gave.

  • M7A1 MacArthur 6.0 years ago

    @randomusername It doesn't but I like designing them with real life factors in mind. And yeah, the rotator is something I forgot to fix. Does it still work when you nudge it into the main hull but no longer in contact with the turret? And paint jobs are something I'm absolutely terrible at. Thank you for taking the time to critique it

  • M7A1 MacArthur 6.0 years ago

    @randomusername Purposefully so. Sloped armor for deflection

  • F/A-17 Lynx (Work In Progress) 6.1 years ago

    @Kaos Then deactivate 8 if it's so hard to deal with. I intentionally designed it to be that maneuverable and there's really not a way to make it more "user friendly." It's not that hard to control once you learn it. Now, if you can create a jet with thrust vectoring that is just as maneuverable and doesn't pitch out of control because the phrase gentle isn't in the user's vocabulary, I will apologize and rescind my statement. But until then, I respectfully disagree with your statement

  • F/A-17 Lynx (Work In Progress) 6.1 years ago

    @Kaos Not it at all. Initially, that is what I thought was the case seeing as I had intentionally placed them close and it would have been a simple fix. However, they are in fact correctly placed. Theach pitch control is phenomenal and requires careful manipulation. Until you reach 700 MPH it's wise not to slam it back, but rather gently ease it so that it barely responds. Once you reach a safe altitude, try getting used to the controls and having fun (somersaults are particularly fun). Thank you for taking the time to point out an error you thought was there. I appreciate your doing so

  • Bacon Aerospace Corporation M2A2 Tiger (export) 6.9 years ago

    @Baldeagle086 Thanks!

  • Hunter Aviation G-04 Sea Lion 6.9 years ago

    @AerodynamicallyConfused my phone does not recognize those characters.

  • Cadet Mk.IV 6.9 years ago

    It's always amazing seeing this leven of a build coming out of unrecognized players. I can say that your planes are in fact better than mine. Keep up the great work!

  • Hunter Aviation G-04 Sea Lion 6.9 years ago

    I was so confused when I tried flying it, just to realize it's a boat

  • DS-01 Grison 6.9 years ago

    This looks just like the Drake Buccaneer from star citizen. Very cool!

  • Panzer Wanderer I 6.9 years ago

    @MrMecha Thanks!

  • Panzer Wanderer I 6.9 years ago

    @EternalDarkness Yeah, I forgot to fix that, oh well. Thanks anyways

  • Panzer Wanderer I 6.9 years ago

    @EternalDarkness Yeah, I forgot to fix that before uploading. Oh well. Thanks anyways

  • Panzer Wanderer I 6.9 years ago

    @EternalDarkness It works, it's just a little wobbly which I can't figure out why, but I suppose that makes it seem a little more realistic

  • Panzer Wanderer I 6.9 years ago

    I was just asking for a suggestion, but I think that's what I'll go with anyways @Maxwell1

  • Panzer Wanderer II 6.9 years ago

    @Maxwell1 also add notifications through the app

  • Panzer Wanderer I 6.9 years ago

    @Maxwell1 well, now I feel like I have to continue the unintentional star wars theme. Maybe I'll do an Allied AT-RT, yeah?

  • Panzer Wanderer II 6.9 years ago

    @RailfanEthan While I don't play the game (dont know why) I am aware of what you are referring to. I'm kinda doing a series of these right now

  • Panzer Wanderer II 6.9 years ago

    @Maxwell1 Haha! I have a WW2 AT-ST as well, the Panzer Wanderer I. For some reason though, it didn't mark this as the successor.

  • Ho 229 6.9 years ago

    It's a very good plane considering you are just now joining the sp community. While it's a good start, I suggest you build planes on a larger scale so you don't miss out on a lot of details. Keep up the good work!

  • British Beauty 6.9 years ago

    @ZephyrSystems I love em. The F-102 and F-106 were very sexy planes as well

  • AR V-30 Harpy 6.9 years ago

    @CyanideKnight No offense, but did you spend any time on the paint at all? Purple for the pylons? I'll assume it was a little rushed

  • Junkers Ju.198 Walküre 6.9 years ago

    @MrVaultech Thank you!

  • British Beauty 6.9 years ago

    @RAF1 Psst, the B-58 Hustler looked better...

  • Spicy bean 6.9 years ago

    Why did you do this? This is not okay man. This is theft

  • Bacon Aerospace Corporation F-8 Night Stalker 7.0 years ago

    @shadowmaker108 No clue. Wasn't any particular one.

  • Bacon Aerospace Corporation F-8 Night Stalker 7.0 years ago

    This was quasi-inspired by some of your builds in case you were wondering @shadowmaker108

  • BAC G-42B Sparrowhawk 7.0 years ago

    @CyanideKnight Don't know what to tell you

  • Seaplane Challenge!!! (Closed) 7.0 years ago

    @SPflyer222 Thanks!

  • Dogfight challenge (Closed) 7.0 years ago

    Is it best out of three for the actual dogfight?

  • Seaplane Challenge!!! (Closed) 7.0 years ago

    @SPflyer222 In any case, thank you

  • Seaplane Challenge!!! (Closed) 7.0 years ago

    @SPflyer222 So that's why you gave me all the upvotes. To be honest, I forgot I had entered the challenge.

  • BAC G-42B Sparrowhawk 7.0 years ago

    @CyanideKnight Really? Please specify

  • BAC G-42B Sparrowhawk 7.0 years ago

    @CyanideKnight Any time. I will admit that I was a little surprised when the right side engine fell off.

  • Which build series? 7.0 years ago

    Hunter Aviation

  • CKI G-16 Gryphon 7.0 years ago

    Remember comrade. You must always build so that we can defeat the germans

  • CKI G-16 Gryphon 7.0 years ago

    This is also a crappy plane. But you're also a beginner.

  • CKI G-16 Gryphon 7.0 years ago

    @shadowmaker108 For sčëøñńsšěe

  • K-11 Trinity 7.0 years ago

    @shadowmaker108 Shut up

  • K-11 Trinity 7.0 years ago

    I hate both of y'all. Freakin making me look bad here...

  • F-5 Sea Tiger (seaplane challenge) 7.0 years ago

    @FilenotFound What exactly do you mean? In order to land correctly throttle all the way off once you're level above where you want to land and then slowly descend pulling up at the last second so that the back of the pontoons go in the water/ground first. Hope that helps