Who will win:
A. Complex aircraft of fictional simpleplanes forums nations' requiring jet A1 fuel to operate nominally.
B. Replacement of jet A1 fuel with bacon grease.
Putting the accident aside, there is neither hero nor villain in this accident, as both sides are equally at fault.
China: The collision can be almost blamed entirely on the Chinese side due to the misjudgement in the intercept, therefore resulting in the collision.
USA: To fully understand why the Americans can be equally blamed, let me talk geography for a quick second. South China Sea and Hainan to the Chinese is almost the equivalent the US's sovereignty of Hawaii and its surrounding waters. The fact that the American aircraft was in sticking their noses into other people's business quite hypothetical. Imagine a Chinese recon aircraft was flying near Hawaii - the Americans would not like it, and most likely shoot it down without peaceful interception. The same goes for China: they don't want US aircraft in their airspace either. @Pim2407
@dootdootbananabus Honestly I would of started small, before doing something big and ambitious like this 737. If you are really in need of help, take apart my airliner and reverse engineer your way through it.
@WalrusManufacturingCo2 Sorry, wrong image. My point is, some fighter jets in our time is intentionally unstable to increase maneuverability. However that is rather difficult to achieve in this game. (BTW, i like joking with matt, don't take this the wrong way)
@WalrusManufacturingCo2 Ignore him, because @Franticmatty's statement is invalid. As seen here, the COL does not have to be behind the COM for an aircraft to sustain flight.
Honestly, that sounds about right. From what I've learned with RC model aircraft (especially pusher designs), in the case of a COT too far back, inducing roll on the main wing would either cause the nose to rise or dip down significantly depending on the angle of attack. E.g. if the plane is descending at a 3 degree slope, rolling causes some weird behaviors to the pitch of the aircraft, mostly causing the nose to rise significantly. ...but that's RC, not sure if it's the same reasoning behind the DC-10.
@Gestour My concern is if the control surfaces are so small and inboard, what other effective purposes can it serve besides pitch? It seems unpractical for it to roll the aircraft.
@aircraftarsenal123 Oh, by easter eggs, I meant this type of easter egg like the bag in the co-pilot's seat, 2 inline inlets, a 2-isle-2 all economy seating config, seatbelt lights, wing tanks, flares, and a single engine... you see where I'm going? xD
Im working on a reworked model of the design, probably ganna be a trijet with STOVL capabilities. I might make a separate version with the little easter eggs hidden upon.@aircraftarsenal123
@jamesPLANESii
I: Yep, 1.7 was the best for detailing thus far.
II: The baconliner and tu-144 is on hold, for now.
III: Collab... I completely forgot
IV: Probably not longer, but the interior will extend into the tail by the means of a toilet.
Wait a second... Chinese "socialism" in the 21st century is literally semi-socialism in reality.
@BACconcordepilot Canada's honestly the most socialist democratic government to ever capitalist.
Who will win:
A. Complex aircraft of fictional simpleplanes forums nations' requiring jet A1 fuel to operate nominally.
B. Replacement of jet A1 fuel with bacon grease.
About sums this comment section up
Of course it doesn't. Half the builds released a year ago were broken by updates a whole while ago. @Noahater5245
700@Davisplanez
Exactly. There is a difference between getting shit down and collision.@Akali @JackTheBestBoss
+1Actually probably F-14s back in the day. After all it's 2001 we're talking about.
Also to not that the Us-China relationship wasn't as good as it is today.
@JackTheBestBoss
Putting the accident aside, there is neither hero nor villain in this accident, as both sides are equally at fault.
China: The collision can be almost blamed entirely on the Chinese side due to the misjudgement in the intercept, therefore resulting in the collision.
USA: To fully understand why the Americans can be equally blamed, let me talk geography for a quick second. South China Sea and Hainan to the Chinese is almost the equivalent the US's sovereignty of Hawaii and its surrounding waters. The fact that the American aircraft was in sticking their noses into other people's business quite hypothetical. Imagine a Chinese recon aircraft was flying near Hawaii - the Americans would not like it, and most likely shoot it down without peaceful interception. The same goes for China: they don't want US aircraft in their airspace either. @Pim2407
The only new one I saw was the rocket plane. Rest of them I believe I still had saved on my iPad over 5 years ago.
+1@SangerAircraft You can download it. Read the pop-up and click OK. It's not hard.
What do you mean? Anything can run 1300 parts, it's just either local fire department gets called to your house or not. @SangerAircraft
Yes it will be mobile friendly with 1299 parts @SangerAircraft
Lol @BaconEggs
@jamesPLANESii I don't struggle either. If i don't like it, i redo the whole thing.
@Dllama4 Lolrip
@Dllama4 Smaller, for sure. Also, if you want, you can strap my smoke pod on it for some trails.
Noice. Does the missile run on vodka?
Fix the exhaust size. Le bacon is slightly triggered.
@dootdootbananabus Honestly I would of started small, before doing something big and ambitious like this 737. If you are really in need of help, take apart my airliner and reverse engineer your way through it.
@jamesPLANESii WHAT DID I HEAR? STRUGGLE?
HOW DARE U!11!!!1!!!1!!!!111
@Dllama4 @Flightsonic I googled it for a solid 20 minutes. Gave up after that.
That honestly makes sense. As the only pics i see when those little things deployed are pics which the aircraft is undergoing some sort maintenance.
@WalrusManufacturingCo2 Sorry, wrong image. My point is, some fighter jets in our time is intentionally unstable to increase maneuverability. However that is rather difficult to achieve in this game. (BTW, i like joking with matt, don't take this the wrong way)
@WalrusManufacturingCo2 Ignore him, because @Franticmatty's statement is invalid. As seen here, the COL does not have to be behind the COM for an aircraft to sustain flight.
Honestly, that sounds about right. From what I've learned with RC model aircraft (especially pusher designs), in the case of a COT too far back, inducing roll on the main wing would either cause the nose to rise or dip down significantly depending on the angle of attack. E.g. if the plane is descending at a 3 degree slope, rolling causes some weird behaviors to the pitch of the aircraft, mostly causing the nose to rise significantly. ...but that's RC, not sure if it's the same reasoning behind the DC-10.
+1@Gestour My concern is if the control surfaces are so small and inboard, what other effective purposes can it serve besides pitch? It seems unpractical for it to roll the aircraft.
@Gestour Any idea why they decided to put an elevon on the tail? Is it due to stability issues caused by the engine mounted on the empennage?
@aircraftarsenal123 Here' let me tag u on it, lets see if ur phone can load it in without getting ur local fire department alerted.
@aircraftarsenal123 I'm ganna stop you here. Its too late. Already 566 parts and the fuselage isnt even finished.
@Awsomur Why would ANYONE in their right mind put mudflaps there?
@aircraftarsenal123 How about pressing 7 blows up the whole plane, but in the distance, a red parachute deploys. (Nah, too much work involved)
@BACconcordepilot Lol. By nonsense I mean people who try to explain what this is, although they clearly doesn't know what they're talking about.
@aircraftarsenal123 Oh, by easter eggs, I meant this type of easter egg like the bag in the co-pilot's seat, 2 inline inlets, a 2-isle-2 all economy seating config, seatbelt lights, wing tanks, flares, and a single engine... you see where I'm going? xD
Well, i think "you kicked the crap out of my drawings" is an understatement.
Absolutely astonishing skill you have there, keep it up! :D
Im working on a reworked model of the design, probably ganna be a trijet with STOVL capabilities. I might make a separate version with the little easter eggs hidden upon.@aircraftarsenal123
@aircraftarsenal123 You can maybe tell from the single rear engine and the "boost" that it's an obvious reference. xD
@aircraftarsenal123 I'm not joking that's actually the inspiration. But don't delete the comment, its fine. xD
Use Imgur if you want better image hosting.
Great jet btw.
@aircraftarsenal123 Crap. now ppl know where the inspiration came from when i originally built my arrow.
Noice.
I'm still intrigued by the private jet that got shot down, the maneuverability of that thing is otherworldly
@CeeToTheZee It's not his 24/7 server. It actually belongs to a guy in japan by the name of Caulk.
No not really. This kinda stuff just happens by chance pretty much. @CeeToTheZee
Good luck sauce boss, stay safe, don't do anything stupid.
+3LET THY FRIEND ON PC FIX THE TEXT HDWBDADWADW AWDWADGGREDS CFWFE WRHRE WWE EFE QW
SEND IT TO ME! THE TEXT IS KILLING ME EYFRGBEHGEGEHRJGEEGREGEGRGRE
Wow! We have a teacher here! Gee i wish my physics teacher could understand the joy of video games...
+3Nope, mine version of the meme was making fun of myself. @dootdootbananabus
@jamesPLANESii @MrSilverWolf ahem!
@jamesPLANESii
I: Yep, 1.7 was the best for detailing thus far.
II: The baconliner and tu-144 is on hold, for now.
III: Collab... I completely forgot
IV: Probably not longer, but the interior will extend into the tail by the means of a toilet.
Turn off the lights, and it would be truly invisible.
+2@chancey21 np