@TheMouse ive never been to Albany. But if you ever get the chance you should go down long island like to Montauk and the Hamptons. I have a house up there, so you get the official recommendation from me lmao.
You see, I actually made a plane, in a plane game, on a device on airplane mode, whilst I was sitting in a plane, being transported in a plane, on it’s way to a place called plane, where it will unload the plane, reassemble the plane, and fly the plane into the air, where it will be on a new plane of existence once no-clipping into the backrooms
@RolyBuilds hold let me get my olde english translations sheet.
Silence! restrain thy tongue, for its ceaseless chatter doth disturb the tranquility of this sacred space. Do not enrage me you mischievous delinquent.
@OpenHere Lmao yea ur right but the B1B Lancer program wasn’t introduced in 1985. The Tu95 Bear was introduced in 1956. Almost 30 years apart, so I am comparing it today with modern standards. But you are right in the way that you are describing it.
@WisconsinStatePolice you’re right but the B1 can be refueled in the air. The b52 is also one of my favs but to me the b1b just stands out. The tu95 really doesn’t stand any kind of chance. It would be detected and neutralized before it would get within firing range. And yes i do think the b1b lancer is a very pretty plane. The 1011 doesn't really seem too astounding though but still looks nice.
@Graingy but heres the thing, yes the B52 is good but doesn’t have the speed or survivability in heavier circumstances. I almost started laughing when I heard the term, “Tu-95”. The thing looks like it is stuck in 1947. It still has turboprops for some weird reason, the engineers must’ve thought, “hmm, I am definitely 100% positive a turboprop bomber that wont stand a real chance against modern fighters within 20-30 years of the first deployment will be a great idea compared to a jet bomber with engines to be refined further in the years to come!” The Tu-95 literally needs to have tires strapped to its wings and fuselage to stop any missiles from causing any damage over Ukraine. The tires don't even help they just contribute to drag, limit maneuverability and evasive maneuvers, make it heavier, pose a hazard to pretty much everything because if it is hit by a missile or whatever the flammable rubber and structural integrity side effects the tires bring just make it an easier target. Can’t believe they actually think tires are effective defensive measures lmao. (Btw I don’t want to cause a debate, I am just talking about my opinion backed up with factual evidence and stuff, dont take it too seriously :D)
@TalonTheCRTguy does the T-38C Talon have variable sweep wings, internal weapons bays, heavy bombing capability, low radar visibility, and nuclear capability?
@Christiant2 8/10, great speed, armament, maneuverability, but straighten out the nose gear because it yaws on takeoff and landing. Just change the Y rotation to 0
@Speedhunter the center of a black hole is hypothetically infinitely dense. Same thing here with this build. Infinity is not a defined number or amount hence it is a term instead. So therefore they are both the same density somehow lmao
@TheMouse ive never been to Albany. But if you ever get the chance you should go down long island like to Montauk and the Hamptons. I have a house up there, so you get the official recommendation from me lmao.
+1Commander of the third reich!
+2@TheMouse where are you going in NY? I used to live in nyc and then later a lot further down long Island
+1You see, I actually made a plane, in a plane game, on a device on airplane mode, whilst I was sitting in a plane, being transported in a plane, on it’s way to a place called plane, where it will unload the plane, reassemble the plane, and fly the plane into the air, where it will be on a new plane of existence once no-clipping into the backrooms
+1@RolyBuilds very well I admit my lawful retreat :(
+1@RolyBuilds No!
+1PEA frenzy, can’t loom anywhere without seeing some PEA
@PannerTerkins scrumptious
+1@FOXHOUND26 probably like June to august or something, don't have much planned for plane building in the summer
T
@LoganTheGameDev any time ;)
@LoganTheGameDev yes
Note: not carrier operable. The aircraft carrier images are just cool in my opinion
@RolyBuilds By the saints! What sorcery is this? I am utterly confounded by the peculiarity of this situation!
+1@RolyBuilds I am confounded by the contemporary matter of thy circumstance as per I haven’t the minimal intimation of aforementioned possibility
+1@TalonTheCRTguy does look badass though and lives up to the reputation
@RolyBuilds hold let me get my olde english translations sheet.
Silence! restrain thy tongue, for its ceaseless chatter doth disturb the tranquility of this sacred space. Do not enrage me you mischievous delinquent.
+1@FOXHOUND26 its not just that, they lack the technology to make one that can now compete with the West
@RolyBuilds no i refuse fore as much thee bare
+1HereBeforeTheMouse!
+3@TheMouse yea
@TheMouse
@OpenHere Lmao yea ur right but the B1B Lancer program wasn’t introduced in 1985. The Tu95 Bear was introduced in 1956. Almost 30 years apart, so I am comparing it today with modern standards. But you are right in the way that you are describing it.
@Graingy a bit less is an understatement
@WisconsinStatePolice you’re right but the B1 can be refueled in the air. The b52 is also one of my favs but to me the b1b just stands out. The tu95 really doesn’t stand any kind of chance. It would be detected and neutralized before it would get within firing range. And yes i do think the b1b lancer is a very pretty plane. The 1011 doesn't really seem too astounding though but still looks nice.
+1@FOXHOUND26 … (I mean I don't want to fight against that it’s good enough, Ill take it)
@Graingy but heres the thing, yes the B52 is good but doesn’t have the speed or survivability in heavier circumstances. I almost started laughing when I heard the term, “Tu-95”. The thing looks like it is stuck in 1947. It still has turboprops for some weird reason, the engineers must’ve thought, “hmm, I am definitely 100% positive a turboprop bomber that wont stand a real chance against modern fighters within 20-30 years of the first deployment will be a great idea compared to a jet bomber with engines to be refined further in the years to come!” The Tu-95 literally needs to have tires strapped to its wings and fuselage to stop any missiles from causing any damage over Ukraine. The tires don't even help they just contribute to drag, limit maneuverability and evasive maneuvers, make it heavier, pose a hazard to pretty much everything because if it is hit by a missile or whatever the flammable rubber and structural integrity side effects the tires bring just make it an easier target. Can’t believe they actually think tires are effective defensive measures lmao. (Btw I don’t want to cause a debate, I am just talking about my opinion backed up with factual evidence and stuff, dont take it too seriously :D)
@TalonTheCRTguy does the T-38C Talon have variable sweep wings, internal weapons bays, heavy bombing capability, low radar visibility, and nuclear capability?
@HanakoSan AAHH—
+1just my opinion, ;) don’t take it too seriously if you simp for the Tu160
@TheUltimatePlaneLover np!
+1Congrats on platinum! 🥳 Remember me as the one who lifted you up!
+1@Apollo018362 W helicopter
@Christiant2 8/10, great speed, armament, maneuverability, but straighten out the nose gear because it yaws on takeoff and landing. Just change the Y rotation to 0
+2@Christiant2 i have no idea how to build anything of the such. Unfortunately i cannot help with this one
+1temu version of @TheMouse (please pin)
+1@Speedhunter the center of a black hole is hypothetically infinitely dense. Same thing here with this build. Infinity is not a defined number or amount hence it is a term instead. So therefore they are both the same density somehow lmao
+1@Christiant2 no cockpit on the CT-4? :(
@Christiant2 nope
@SuperSuperTheSylph oops i didnt update my spreadsheet
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph click the (here) in the pinned comment
+1@Solent19 roger that
+1@TheMouse yes
if you want to be tagged on any future builds, comment T on the teasers or ask to be put on my tagging list located (here)
@DatFiat126Guy19
+1@EasternAviation2015
@BYardley
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
+1@MAPA
@BadahhMuscleCar001
@Delta243
+1@Christiant2
@SLSD11ph
@GeneralCorpInc
+1@Emma159
@DogedogebreadWithAnAK47
@TheMouse
@Mav3r1ck
@IzzyTheCat
skibidi dop dop dop yes yes
+1