I was confused if the word “dose” was misspelled until I realized that the two grammatically incorrect sentences in the title weren’t separated by a period.
@Graingy KSP 2 is expected to be better in many ways, but there are features such as planet studio and tinker panel that can not and will not ever be replicated in that game. I will say for sure that JNO is better than KSP 1, however.
@Planebuilder2122 Poison is a good idea. What if the poison was a toxin that took over the mind of whatever it’s injected into and makes it a hyperaggressive, fearless zombie “programmed” by the toxin to protect the alligator?
Retractable spikes hidden under its scales that push out between the gaps in scales. This could be used if something else tried to grab it, to stab them as a deterrent.
@PianoZystersAerospace How can it be called cheating if it works? Also, that happened to me once after the AI plane had used all of its missiles and was on an unavoidable collision course.
The Fokker may actually be able to avoid a lock, as its primitive engine will have a lower heat signature than a modern jet, and it’s a relatively small target.
@32 An F-14 and an F-35 are more evenly matched than a Fokker and an SU-33. Also, the Fokker’s low speed and exceptional maneuverability could potentially allow the pilot to dive for the ground, make an emergency landing, start running away from the aircraft, while the SU-33 struggles to get a lock because it keeps overshooting the Fokker. Then the SU-33 would target and destroy the pilot as he tries to run away.
Interesting opinion. Both planes are built for BVR engagements, with the F-14’s long range missiles, and the F-35’s stealth. One likely scenario is that both planes would malfunction and crash. In the end, it all comes down to the fact that it isn’t the plane, it’s the pilot.
T
+4What did you find? The Wright Island terrain piece?
+1F-111?
T
T
+1Do not mention that name. People who question the undo button are known to disappear forever…
+5@Hashys Good point.
+2How do you convince bored kids to attend being your child to work day when you work at a nuclear power plant?
Tell them that there’s a pool there.
+7I was confused if the word “dose” was misspelled until I realized that the two grammatically incorrect sentences in the title weren’t separated by a period.
T
T
@Graingy That analogy was both true and one of the funniest things I’ve heard all week.
+12 Rickrolls (O and a period in your bio), and another YouTube video about a lobster from a u in your bio.
T
+1T
@Graingy KSP 2 is expected to be better in many ways, but there are features such as planet studio and tinker panel that can not and will not ever be replicated in that game. I will say for sure that JNO is better than KSP 1, however.
+3I vote a Ryanair livery with detachable landing gear.
+3T+
+1T
I would recommend mobile compatible builds because I like your creations and want to continue to be able to use them.
+2@Mastereldo Pigpen dogfight. It worked fine until I had to shut down the engine to use the missile, and I got destroyed right after I blew up pigpen.
I have no idea, but the last comment bears a striking resemblance to the end of level line from the World War Two torpedo bomber level.
+2T
T
+1T
@Mastereldo
9 Upvotes, 9 Upvotes, 9 Upvotes, 3 Upvotes
+1@Mastereldo Yes, that would be acceptable.
Is this the end of the SimplePlanes website as we know it?
+2This really scared me for a second.
+5@JeskoGoesVROOM I have reported every single one of those posts I have seen.
+1@AuroraPlanes
3 Upvotes
@ThatPlaneDude0 Yes, it can reach speeds of up to 3,000mph.
+2Can I still enter?
@32
6 Upvotes
The command also works with Destroyer and Destroyer2.
+1T
@Planebuilder2122 Poison is a good idea. What if the poison was a toxin that took over the mind of whatever it’s injected into and makes it a hyperaggressive, fearless zombie “programmed” by the toxin to protect the alligator?
Retractable spikes hidden under its scales that push out between the gaps in scales. This could be used if something else tried to grab it, to stab them as a deterrent.
T
+1I’m going to give you an upvote for this information.
+2@PianoZystersAerospace How can it be called cheating if it works? Also, that happened to me once after the AI plane had used all of its missiles and was on an unavoidable collision course.
Cheat how?
@G2 Shhhh
+1Awesome! Make sure to check out my channel as well.
+3T
+1T
+1The Fokker may actually be able to avoid a lock, as its primitive engine will have a lower heat signature than a modern jet, and it’s a relatively small target.
+2@32 An F-14 and an F-35 are more evenly matched than a Fokker and an SU-33. Also, the Fokker’s low speed and exceptional maneuverability could potentially allow the pilot to dive for the ground, make an emergency landing, start running away from the aircraft, while the SU-33 struggles to get a lock because it keeps overshooting the Fokker. Then the SU-33 would target and destroy the pilot as he tries to run away.
+2Interesting opinion. Both planes are built for BVR engagements, with the F-14’s long range missiles, and the F-35’s stealth. One likely scenario is that both planes would malfunction and crash. In the end, it all comes down to the fact that it isn’t the plane, it’s the pilot.
+1I personally prefer diving to less than a hundred feat and weaving until I’m about a mile away, then I open up with whatever weapons I’m carrying.
+1