@LancasterAce If you want to use it as one of your aircraft, I recommend removing the Insignia from the aircraft (the bullet-shaped image on the helo) to prove that it's yours. The insignia is the official Insignia for W.A.S.P, also you might like to make your own.
I love the rudder design and weaponry, along with the fuel tanks, but I feel like the wings at the very front could be removed. Other than that it's a good aircraft. 8.5/10 would use again.
I say make aircraft that may already be out there. Everyone likes to see someone try a replica no matter the aircraft. I've made at least 8 P-51s so go ahead and try the aircraft you listed. Also, custom builds are just as cool. It's cool to see a Westland Wyvern, but also cool to see a 2077 model B-29.
I say make replicas, regardless if they're already out there, but also let your imagination run wild.
This classification is similar to the USAF classification, but I wasn’t intending for it to be the same. Sorry if I looked like I was basing it off of the USAF. If I was, then I would credit the USAF. Thanks for the question so others would know, @Jacobdaniel
@RandomContent2 oof lol
@PINGASMACHINE I appreciate it! I've never built an immobile Flak gun before so I'm glad you enjoy it!
@RandomContent2 Well, the Ta 152 was a successor to the Fw 190, but they were kind of the same thing so i guess ya
I see some potential. Look at the Ta-152. You might like building that idk.
This is BEAUTIFUL
@Awesomegamer9786 Mark 2?
If you do go, I’ll miss you @Colonel1J2R3Wolf!
@Dllama4 I was hoping to see if anyone wants to try and take a shot at building it.
@LancasterAce If you want to use it as one of your aircraft, I recommend removing the Insignia from the aircraft (the bullet-shaped image on the helo) to prove that it's yours. The insignia is the official Insignia for W.A.S.P, also you might like to make your own.
Absolutely love the turret design. It works greatly as Anti-Air. Please continue the turret idea.
@ASDFASDF1 It technically is, since it's supposed to dive into its target.
@CptJacobson I’ll keep it in mind for now. I could get you a concept sometime.
Very nice design!
Thanks @breitling! The aircraft I design are usually very simple, therefore being lag-free and fun to use.
I'm in SC. This should be fun!
Congratulations James! This is a time to remember!
Better than my first Wyvern. Great job!
Well it’s fast, probably bounces off radio waves well so stealthy, And has a great payload @Vectorgraphics
Makes a good Strategic Bomber
I love the rudder design and weaponry, along with the fuel tanks, but I feel like the wings at the very front could be removed. Other than that it's a good aircraft. 8.5/10 would use again.
@BaconEggs thanks for the info. I’ll check it out when I can.
@InternationalAircraftCompany school hours are 8:10-3:40.
@MIWTheGamer I'll do D variant
@MIWTheGamer uh sure why not?
@FuturePlanes101 you might like the RZ-1A5 Mk II
Great maneuverability. The only thing that could use fixing is the intakes and engines could be more inside the aircraft. Just body redesign.
I like this design. I might try it myself.
@MIWTheGamer I understand that. I’d rather you get caught up on health terms rather than SP.
@MIWTheGamer noice
One part I love is the sight and visibility. It really helps in dogfights!
@MIWTheGamer you did not just do that XD
@MIWTheGamer fine by me! I’ll love to see the final product!
@MIWTheGamer eh things happen!
here ya go
okay actually the issue is the plane is small where it handle much speeds at all. I'll still come up with something micro tho
@ThomasW i got u bro
dat control doh!
@MIWTheGamer accidental steal lol
After all this time we thought we knew what the P-51D looked like...
...We were so, so wrong.
I'm glad the scramjet idea has grown again. I made a fictional scramjet myself but it's nice to see another jet that's real.
BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRT
Ya got it, @JelloAircraftCorporation
@RamboJutter It's a certain plane I'm making again. I tried it before but I want to improve it. A hint is Kurt Tank.
@ScreamingApe
Me: claps because this account has become great after a progressive 8 months
"Yeet."
I say make aircraft that may already be out there. Everyone likes to see someone try a replica no matter the aircraft. I've made at least 8 P-51s so go ahead and try the aircraft you listed. Also, custom builds are just as cool. It's cool to see a Westland Wyvern, but also cool to see a 2077 model B-29.
I say make replicas, regardless if they're already out there, but also let your imagination run wild.
This classification is similar to the USAF classification, but I wasn’t intending for it to be the same. Sorry if I looked like I was basing it off of the USAF. If I was, then I would credit the USAF. Thanks for the question so others would know, @Jacobdaniel
Absolutely love this aircraft, but there are a few design flaws:
On the BRIGHT side though...
Those are my basic pros and cons for you. Overall, I rate 8/10.
Simple, yet creative! I really like how this is designed!
I highly support your opinion, @TheDepressedPig. I’ll probably end up improving the Blenheim soon.
@EternalDarkness Thanks!