15.9k Allstar Comments

  • MIG-31 10.4 years ago

    Well, the maneuverability is quite low, but it's rather fast

  • FA18 by SR update 10.4 years ago

    NICE!@SpiritusRaptor

  • FA18 by SR update 10.4 years ago

    ...so...is the yf-23 a go?

  • Velox EliteJet 10.4 years ago

    @Jewel what's your problem? I looked at your profile and all you ever do is throw shade at RocketLL!

  • Missile truck 10.4 years ago

    The cockpit view on this thing is worth 5 stars alone. The attention you payed to both interior and exterior detail is simply on a league of it's own. Congrats. I actually haven't legitimately rated anyone like this in a while

  • MIG-31 10.4 years ago

    The mig25 is the "foxbat." The mig31 is the "foxhound." Pick one

  • F-16C Fighting Falcon (with improved missiles) 10.4 years ago

    Curious, but then I noticed that you haven't stopped cheating@Sabro

  • F-16C Fighting Falcon (with improved missiles) 10.4 years ago

    Dont rate your own aircraft

  • Me163 Komet V1 10.4 years ago

    Meh... Not all too historically accurate. Real wings are swept. Feel free to try again with my Me163 as a foundation

  • 1200+ Avro CF-105 Arrow 10.4 years ago

    @timeisimaginary it's from an older version of the game. Feel free to download and save the part to your subassemblies

  • MAX Speed Challenge 10.4 years ago

    What's the maximum amount of engines allowed in the design. That should also be a restriction

  • MAX Speed Challenge 10.4 years ago

    See, something like that doesn't count. There is no design or work that was put into that aircraft@GKrollin

  • MAX Speed Challenge 10.4 years ago

    This challenge is too vague, please set some restrictions. That's what makes it a challenge

  • Paul maskery 10.4 years ago

    More points for Wakescar. Besides this guy is anonymous, so no points for him

  • F-14 Tomcat 10.4 years ago

    Nice adaptation

  • Stingray D 10.4 years ago

    Quit rating ur own planes. You can get banned for this. Do you want to get banned again...after you just got back?

  • Sukhoi SU-37 Terminator 10.4 years ago

    I dont see any need for improvement. Sharp turns at low altitudes are expected to break you. This plane has punchy acceleration and increbible maneuverability, which I love! Also, the angles of the side profile and the way you use the wings to create the body are just too good

  • Lockheed P-38G Lightning 10.4 years ago

    Quit rating your own planes

  • Pond Racer 10.4 years ago

    Can you not read, stupid? Clearly says pond racer. Even so, why give it 1 star. It's not 1 star material@flightguy

  • Arrow-4 10.4 years ago

    More points for me

  • F22 Update by SR 10.4 years ago

    Great job! Love the cannons. Might use them in some of my designs...while giving you credit, of course. YOU SHOULD BUILD A YF-23 NEXT

  • 1200+ Avro CF-105 Arrow 10.4 years ago

    Me or James C. Floyd?@StealthyWalrus

  • Me-163 rocket interceptor 10.4 years ago

    More points for me... Also, you ruined the design

  • Dominator. 10.4 years ago

    Plz stop posting this again and again

  • RQ-4 Global Hawk UAV 10.4 years ago

    No prob. It was a good design@ElijtheGeat

  • Global Hawk 10.4 years ago

    Not a bad replica

  • Allstarships "val" bomber 10.4 years ago

    The bomb carriage seems to be dragging on the ground...still love the paint! Also, the main wheels look NOICE

  • 1200+ Avro CF-105 Arrow 10.4 years ago

    @Rush i've never broken this thing. Maybe you're flying in low graphics

  • 1200+ Avro CF-105 Arrow 10.4 years ago

    @Rush it really doesn't

  • F35 Joint Strike Fighter by SR 10.4 years ago

    HATER ALERT! HATER ALERT!

  • F35 Joint Strike Fighter by SR 10.4 years ago

    Looks like i'm first in a long line of 5-star ratings. Probably one of the best planes ever made on this site. Nice vid by the way!

  • MH-53 Pave Low Mk. I(Outdated) 10.4 years ago

    Well, good luck with that@WeeBabySeamus

  • MH-53 Pave Low Mk. I(Outdated) 10.4 years ago

    Hella effort coming from you. Nice work. Looks great

  • Turboisajetplane 10.4 years ago

    Dude, this isn't a good plane.@Clarent99

  • Turboisajetplane 10.4 years ago

    Man, you really haven't seen anything better than a "mustang" with 2 large turbofan jet engines strapped to it? @AnonymousUser99

  • star challenge responce 10.4 years ago

    Lol, you know you're too late, right?

  • FN BLZRD v1 10.4 years ago

    Unique, solid design

  • Shark 10.4 years ago

    Did you make this...no,you didn't. You simply copied someone elses work. Ur terrible

  • YF-23 10.4 years ago

    Terrible. Mine was better, by far

  • RQ-4 Global Hawk UAV 10.4 years ago

    Thank you @hypnotoad

  • BALLS!!! 10.4 years ago

    How is this on top? Really shouldn't be

  • Curtiss P-40 Warhawk 10.4 years ago

    Not bad

  • Amazing Jetpack Geoff Joyride 10.4 years ago

    I second that @thomasjaf @Katrina

  • F-8 fixed 10.4 years ago

    -_- wheels compromise the design

  • p51 mustang fixed so u can take off 10.4 years ago

    Meh, more for me

  • biplane 10.4 years ago

    Absolutely terrible that you copied, but no point in depriving rhe real creator of some free points

  • Zepplin Staaken R.IV 10.4 years ago

    I can tell that this took a lot of work. However, wtong time period. Maybe you should submit this to SUKINIM's prop challenge on reddit

  • Zer02 10.4 years ago

    At first glance, you think thia is just some basic plane, but it's not. It simply makeup is just a ruse for what can only be described as a one-size-fits-all type of aircraft. So fun and simple to fly, generous to handle, has TV for enhanced maneuvers. Honestly, i couldn't ask for much more

  • Heavystar 2 Carrier 10.4 years ago

    AWESOME...but breaks easily. If it breaks apart on the runway, restart

  • Boeing 777-200 10.4 years ago

    Dude. He's right. What you're doing is against the rules of posting@Sabro