Really wanted to try this, but it crashes my device every time. :( Rating this on faith because it looks nice and I'd like to think that it works well, too.
@planepilot Haha, this thing is very old and honestly not very good. I appreciate that you rated kindly anyway. If you want a better rover, you could try my newer rover called "Spiderman Rover" or another similar one that skydives called "skydiving rover". Other users have also made much better rovers than this one!
It does pitch up a lot, and one piece keeps falling off, but it's fun and I like the look. I also appreciate the lighthearted presentation of the backstory! So many people on here put these big Wikipedia essays about their historical/fictional plane recreation as if it's some sort of museum exhibit, I like your approach better.
Very nice! I always thought that the opening scene with these ships in episode III was very visually impressive. And I appreciate the effort to make it mobile-friendly.
@Stingray Thank you! But I'm not going to bother revising this, as it was more frustrating than fun to make and it made the game crash half the time on my lousy device. I appreciate the tip, though!
@Gorobloso Friend, I believe that must have happened because you did not read and follow the directions in the description. If you do not follow them, it will not work.
@humangrenade 10 million feet is quite high! Do you perhaps mean 10,000? Either way, as long as it is falling nose downward with flaps out, it is supposed to slow down as it falls due to its low terminal velocity. I'm sorry that it didn't work!
@hypnotoad As always, I appreciate your kindness. But I really wasn't trying to plug the plane; though I admit that I am fond of citing it as an example, it is truthfully quite boring to fly and not worth your time. Take care!
This is a nice, elegant plane! I thought it was odd to have the engines as different activation groups, but then I saw that once you're off the ground, the small asymmetry of thrust when flying with only one engine doesn't really matter in flight. Nice!
@hypnotoad Thank you very much for humoring me, I appreciate that. I should add that in the case of a plane like the one I mentioned, it is probably not worthwhile to do what I did and make a crazy intake/engine ratio, because it becomes rather tedious and boring to spend several minutes gaining altitude at low speed just to get to the "good" part of the flight. Not suitable for a game like this, where I expect most people like to fly, crash, and repeat very quickly.
Thought I'd pitch in. Yes, intakes add drag but improve high-altitude performance. A good example is a plane I made around two months ago called "pioneer", it has only one engine but many, many intakes. It's quite slow at low altitude, probably under 500mph max at sea level, but at 65,000 ft it can go over 1300, and it can get to over 130,000 ft. That is the trade off.
@humangrenade well thank you! But it really should not explode... Do you mean just the nose, or the whole thing? The whole thing should not explode unless the drag flaps aren't out, so I hope that is not what you mean... But thanks, glad you liked it anyway!
Very nice, love the shape
@JoeAdkinson13 Well thanks!
Pretty unique!
@Austinowen Thanks for all the ratings the other day, very nice of you!
It sure is nice looking. Reminds me of the model I had as a kid.
Looks and flies great! And I like the homage to unglamorous crop dusters.
Really wanted to try this, but it crashes my device every time. :( Rating this on faith because it looks nice and I'd like to think that it works well, too.
Nice plane!
Because it's a sad, rainy day where I am, too
Very cool, like that unfolding tower you made a while back.
This is clever. Good luck with the Examination.
Nice!
This is awesome.
@AirsoftPilot this plane is quite old; I don't know how you even found it on the website, but thank you!
I like the look, and it flies pretty nicely!
It's a nice little plane!
Nice!
@planepilot Haha, this thing is very old and honestly not very good. I appreciate that you rated kindly anyway. If you want a better rover, you could try my newer rover called "Spiderman Rover" or another similar one that skydives called "skydiving rover". Other users have also made much better rovers than this one!
@Gorobloso It really should take off just fine, sorry it didn't work for you!
@Wakescar Thanks a lot!
I was just playing with this again and noticed for the first time that you included the asymmetrical tail boom-that's a nice detail!
It does pitch up a lot, and one piece keeps falling off, but it's fun and I like the look. I also appreciate the lighthearted presentation of the backstory! So many people on here put these big Wikipedia essays about their historical/fictional plane recreation as if it's some sort of museum exhibit, I like your approach better.
Nice!
I'm not sure what it takes to make a robot dog look authentic, but whatever it is, this has it. I wish it had more visible ears, though!
Very nice! I always thought that the opening scene with these ships in episode III was very visually impressive. And I appreciate the effort to make it mobile-friendly.
@hypnotoad haha, thank you, but that's certainly untrue. Your stuff is very unique, you surely would have been noticed regardless!
@hypnotoad Thank you. You are too kind, as always
I love supermaneuverable planes in this game. They're the most fun to fly, especially on mobile.
This is clever!
This is quite neat! Works well, very creative.
This is pretty awesome!
I like the look and overall design of this a lot!
Very, very nice!
@SkipperBing Thanks, I appreciate that
@Stingray Thank you! But I'm not going to bother revising this, as it was more frustrating than fun to make and it made the game crash half the time on my lousy device. I appreciate the tip, though!
Pretty neat!
@SkipperBing Haha, I believe it. Sounds ambitious. Good luck with that!
Very neat! I like your take on thrust vectoring.
Yes!! Wish I'd thought to make this first. Now, which button activates Death Blossom??
It looks cool in the water!
It works pretty well, both on land and in water. It would look nicer with a new paint job!
@Gorobloso Friend, I believe that must have happened because you did not read and follow the directions in the description. If you do not follow them, it will not work.
@humangrenade 10 million feet is quite high! Do you perhaps mean 10,000? Either way, as long as it is falling nose downward with flaps out, it is supposed to slow down as it falls due to its low terminal velocity. I'm sorry that it didn't work!
@hypnotoad As always, I appreciate your kindness. But I really wasn't trying to plug the plane; though I admit that I am fond of citing it as an example, it is truthfully quite boring to fly and not worth your time. Take care!
This is a nice, elegant plane! I thought it was odd to have the engines as different activation groups, but then I saw that once you're off the ground, the small asymmetry of thrust when flying with only one engine doesn't really matter in flight. Nice!
@hypnotoad Thank you very much for humoring me, I appreciate that. I should add that in the case of a plane like the one I mentioned, it is probably not worthwhile to do what I did and make a crazy intake/engine ratio, because it becomes rather tedious and boring to spend several minutes gaining altitude at low speed just to get to the "good" part of the flight. Not suitable for a game like this, where I expect most people like to fly, crash, and repeat very quickly.
Thought I'd pitch in. Yes, intakes add drag but improve high-altitude performance. A good example is a plane I made around two months ago called "pioneer", it has only one engine but many, many intakes. It's quite slow at low altitude, probably under 500mph max at sea level, but at 65,000 ft it can go over 1300, and it can get to over 130,000 ft. That is the trade off.
@humangrenade well thank you! But it really should not explode... Do you mean just the nose, or the whole thing? The whole thing should not explode unless the drag flaps aren't out, so I hope that is not what you mean... But thanks, glad you liked it anyway!
I like the styling!
Meant to try this, but forgot until now. Very nice.