@Graingy well that is true but keep in mind it did come out in 2015, so the game definitely doesn't look good by today's standards, but it was fine for back then. Especially with UI design and stuff, J:NO's is a bit of a visual atrocity, while KSP is pretty much just Windows 7 nostalgia.
@Graingy I would say overall, KSP feels a bit more finished and polished albeit old and outdated, while J:NO's graphics and overall design are better but a bit rough around the edges.
@Graingy yeah Juno has a whole career mode with tech tree paths for both space exploration and in-atmosphere stuff like cars and planes. The controls are way better, you have the option to line up exactly the heading you want to go to and your rocket will do it, unlike in KSP where tapping the "W" button once will send you into a death spin that will do irreparable damage to your pilot. In KSP yeah the rockets are rigid, which I don't personally care about but it could be nice for some people I guess.
@Randomplayer Surprisingly, it doesn't really have any crash physics. Here's some raw uncut footage of me flying a plane around, if you skip to the end you'll notice that when I crash into the ground nothing really happens. I imagine if FO had soft body physics, it would start being less of a rival to SimplePlanes and more of a rival to BeamNG, but with planes instead of cars. As of right now, though, the crash physics in SimplePlanes are actually better.
I'm halfway in between the first one and the second one. Like, I probably have the skills to do a little better, but I haven't really put that much effort into anything yet.
@Aviator720 buddy I'm not sure you know the definition of the word “propaganda“. It means biased or misleading information with the goal of pushing a certain standpoint. Sort of like that comment you just posted on here. Also, I don't appreciate you calling me irresponsible just because you disagree with my video.
@nordoverman lol I've had a link to my youtube channel in my bio for a while so chances are somebody on the site has heard my voice before. But yes, this is the first time my voice has been on a post on the site.
@Majakalona assuming you have the lowest end model (you may or may not, this is just what I'm using for my assessment), your laptop probably can run it. You probably won't have as much designer lag as me, and you can almost definitely have better graphics in the free fly mode. If you buy it on Steam, you can refund it later if it doesn't work on your device as long as you have spent under 2 hours in game.
@Majakalona yeah the price difference is about $7 USD. I have no clue how well Roblox functions as a PC benchmark, but flyout seems to be more related to the GPU, which basically means that the lag is caused by the graphics. So while my CPU wasn't working too hard, my GPU was maxed out.
Thanks for watching my video! I'm excited to see where Flyout and SimplePlanes lead in the future. There are some things I didn't cover in the video, such as the overall building experience in each game, but suffice it to say Flyout does have some very advanced features, such as cross-section fuselage editing. Don't worry though, I won't be leaving SP any time soon, but once I upgrade my hardware I might start playing Flyout on a regular basis.
If you enjoyed this video, please consider subscribing. Getting more subscribers would expand my outreach and would help motivate me to create more related content on YouTube. Thanks!
worst comes to worst, you can take the xml files from your computer and use google drive or something to transfer them all to your phone's aircraft folder.
So if you go to the blueprints menu and choose a photo from your device you can include the blueprint in your screenshot. So take the screenshot on your device then use it as a blueprint.
sounds like its attempting to hide from the fact that it's a furry-related rp thingy
not trying to state any personal opinions about that; just pointing it out.
awkward 4.6 year silence
+1@Graingy basically the whole User Experience.
+1@Graingy you’re not wrong. Very few Windows UX designs have aged well.
+2@Graingy well that is true but keep in mind it did come out in 2015, so the game definitely doesn't look good by today's standards, but it was fine for back then. Especially with UI design and stuff, J:NO's is a bit of a visual atrocity, while KSP is pretty much just Windows 7 nostalgia.
+2@Graingy I would say overall, KSP feels a bit more finished and polished albeit old and outdated, while J:NO's graphics and overall design are better but a bit rough around the edges.
+2@Graingy yeah it was a typo, I meant J:NO
+2@Graingy yeah Juno has a whole career mode with tech tree paths for both space exploration and in-atmosphere stuff like cars and planes. The controls are way better, you have the option to line up exactly the heading you want to go to and your rocket will do it, unlike in KSP where tapping the "W" button once will send you into a death spin that will do irreparable damage to your pilot. In KSP yeah the rockets are rigid, which I don't personally care about but it could be nice for some people I guess.
+2@Graingy and J:NO is actually better than ksp imo
+1@Graingy I played for about an hour. It was mildly entertaining.
+2lol the music is crazy
El niño
Yeah if you use troll shield you can’t see them and they can’t see you to my knowledge
+1What platinum players are you referring to? I am not aware of any.
@Robomo119E I highly doubt flyout will ever be on mobile unfortunately.
+8@ollielebananiaCFSP it’s just a little funny to me with the MacBook in the back
@Randomplayer Surprisingly, it doesn't really have any crash physics. Here's some raw uncut footage of me flying a plane around, if you skip to the end you'll notice that when I crash into the ground nothing really happens. I imagine if FO had soft body physics, it would start being less of a rival to SimplePlanes and more of a rival to BeamNG, but with planes instead of cars. As of right now, though, the crash physics in SimplePlanes are actually better.
I'm halfway in between the first one and the second one. Like, I probably have the skills to do a little better, but I haven't really put that much effort into anything yet.
+2@BeastHunter agreed
+2@Brayden1981 like I said at 1:25, flyout is PC only :(
Be jamesPLANESiiii
Dang, can't imagine a P-51 would be cheap
@Aviator720 buddy I'm not sure you know the definition of the word “propaganda“. It means biased or misleading information with the goal of pushing a certain standpoint. Sort of like that comment you just posted on here. Also, I don't appreciate you calling me irresponsible just because you disagree with my video.
+5That setup bwahahaha
@nordoverman lol I've had a link to my youtube channel in my bio for a while so chances are somebody on the site has heard my voice before. But yes, this is the first time my voice has been on a post on the site.
@Majakalona assuming you have the lowest end model (you may or may not, this is just what I'm using for my assessment), your laptop probably can run it. You probably won't have as much designer lag as me, and you can almost definitely have better graphics in the free fly mode. If you buy it on Steam, you can refund it later if it doesn't work on your device as long as you have spent under 2 hours in game.
+1yeah I ain't clicking that
+1@Majakalona yeah the price difference is about $7 USD. I have no clue how well Roblox functions as a PC benchmark, but flyout seems to be more related to the GPU, which basically means that the lag is caused by the graphics. So while my CPU wasn't working too hard, my GPU was maxed out.
+1Thanks for watching my video! I'm excited to see where Flyout and SimplePlanes lead in the future. There are some things I didn't cover in the video, such as the overall building experience in each game, but suffice it to say Flyout does have some very advanced features, such as cross-section fuselage editing. Don't worry though, I won't be leaving SP any time soon, but once I upgrade my hardware I might start playing Flyout on a regular basis.
If you enjoyed this video, please consider subscribing. Getting more subscribers would expand my outreach and would help motivate me to create more related content on YouTube. Thanks!
5
3
@MRM19 sure I can help out
+1Hey hope you’re doing ok man, idk what’s going on in your life but hopefully everything is better soon.
@Graingy 😳
+1worst comes to worst, you can take the xml files from your computer and use google drive or something to transfer them all to your phone's aircraft folder.
+2@Graingy perfect comment does not exist:
+1@Tingly06822 dude this looks sick! looking forward to judging it.
+2Second
So if you go to the blueprints menu and choose a photo from your device you can include the blueprint in your screenshot. So take the screenshot on your device then use it as a blueprint.
sounds like its attempting to hide from the fact that it's a furry-related rp thingy
+1not trying to state any personal opinions about that; just pointing it out.
@L1nus so quite a bit of time, I would imagine.
how many hours would you say you put in on average on each of your builds?
Is it in {these goofy brackets}?
@ToeTips me no crinzge when’s I rite shtuff
+3Seriously though, no matter what I write, it's still going to be cringeworthy to me in a couple years.
@DuskBlade they do but it’s not as loud/obnoxious.
+1this doesn't really count cause the user already had a different account, but this
you could build a custom propeller with rotators and I think it would be pretty much silent.
+1@Transair56 oh yeah he's just not terribly active. He might appear if we tag him tho
@Graingy also, here's jesuschrist's current account
+1@Graingy idk maybe. Out of the thousands of players he follows it does make sense that a couple might be missing.
@Graingy I mean in terms of gaming, yeah you are kinda invisible
+1