Profile image

Republic F-105G "Wild Weasel III"

48.6k EngieWeeb  5 months ago

Had this sitting around for a while, figured I would actually post it. As much as I like the F-105 IRL, this was probably one of the most frustrating builds to work on; I was switching between 3-5 different blueprints of both single-and-twin seaters, they all had variances in the lines and scale, and you would be surprised how few blueprints exist for the -105F and G...especially ones that have the godforsaken landing gear down.

Was gonna do an asymmetrical loadout with a 450US Gal wing tank, one AGM-78, the centerline 650 tank, and the two shrikes, but not only does it (obviously) mess with flight performance, takeoff was pretty much impossible. Even when I adjusted liftScale on the rudder, it wouldn't lift off until about 200kts which...no. So, this build didn't exactly endear me to it after a while. It's rough, and I'm not overly proud of it as a whole, but it'll suffice.

Also I put this in the early baremetal livery because camo is pain. Also just makes my build a touch more interesting to look at, me thinks.


Controls

Group1 - Emergency tailhook
Group2 - Drogue chute
Group3 - N/A
Group4 - Jettison drop tank
Group5 - Airbrake
Group6 - Jettison weapon stores
Group7 - N/A
Group8 - Master arm
VTOL - Flaps
Trim - Pitch trim


Loadout
1X M61A1 Vulcan, 1028 rounds
2x China Lake AGM-45A Shrike
2x General Dynamics AGM-78A Standard ARM
1x 650US Gal centerline drop tank


Short History


This is actually an F-105F Wild Weasel II; note no ECM pod bulges on fuselage

Modified from twin-seat F-105F Thunderchief's already in service with the USAF, The F-105G Thunderchief was a specially modified variant built with the express purpose of performing the evolving 'Wild Weasel' SEAD (Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses) mission task. With lessons learned from the -105F Wild Weasel II's fresh in the Air Force's mind, the new iteration received a new suite of avionics for use in detecting and combating the radar systems used by Vietnamese AA(A) and SAM sites to fire on US strike packages. This included a new radar warning receiver (for general detection of enemy radar), radar homing and warning system (for more precise targeting compared to the RWR), a new launch warning receiver, and the addition of an electronic countermeasures pod split in two and melded to the lower fuselage. This gave the new Wild Weasel III a distinct look compared to the earlier version, and it also had the benefit of freeing up all five pylons for use to carry stores. Crews carried a variety of arms for their special mission, but the consistent favorites by the close of Operation Rolling thunder appears to have been some combination of AGM-45A Shrike and AGM-78A/B Standard ARM missiles; cluster bombs also seem to have stayed in use for leveling the sites themselves.

Unlike the regular F-105D single-seaters, the -105F and G variants stayed in use right to the end of US involvement in Vietnam and the greater SEA region, performing their dangerous game of hide and seek alongside F-4 Phantoms set aside to provide the killing power against Vietnamese ground defenses. Their legacy of the Wild Weasel mission stays in effect today thanks to dedicated F-16C's (sometimes called F-16CJ), and it's likely the F-35 will take over the SEAD job as they trickle into service with US and other nations.

Source: Air Vectors, my smooth brain :P

General Characteristics

  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 35.1ft (10.7m)
  • Length 70.2ft (21.4m)
  • Height 23.0ft (7.0m)
  • Empty Weight 35,718lbs (16,201kg)
  • Loaded Weight 50,493lbs (22,903kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.485
  • Wing Loading 98.6lbs/ft2 (481.5kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 512.0ft2 (47.6m2)
  • Drag Points 1120

Parts

  • Number of Parts 342
  • Control Surfaces 10
  • Performance Cost 1,571
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    48.6k EngieWeeb

    @ChiChiWerx Y'know, thinking about it, given the small-ish wing relative to the size of the plane I suppose that makes sense in retrospect. I'll keep this in mind if I ever remake my F-105D build.
    .
    I think I was more concerned about how it aggressively drifted with the original planned configuration (I've never known how much these drop tanks weigh by themselves, no fuel). The asymmetric AGM-78/drop tank setup just wasn't going to work, sadly.
    .
    If there's anything else I didn't get quite right I'd love to know. Good to see a comment from you again too. :)

    +1 5 months ago
  • Profile image
    29.8k ChiChiWerx

    200 KIAS liftoff wasn’t actually unrealistic. Fully loaded out in hot weather, the bomber version of the “Thud” would often lift off at 230 KIAS. The WW, though, was a bit lighter without all those iron bombs, so takeoffs were a bit slower. All those Century series jets had high takeoff, approach and landing speeds.

    +1 5 months ago
  • Profile image

    When the weasel goes wild O_O

    5 months ago
  • Profile image
    48.6k EngieWeeb

    @TheCommentaryGuy wut

    5 months ago
  • Profile image

    pookie bear finally made the thud

    5 months ago