Profile image

Fighter - ASF-14 (Super Tomcat 21)

8,090 SimplePotato  yesterday
Auto Credit Based on SimplePotato's F-14 [PEA]

Happy 4th of July!

“In the early 1990s, Grumman proposed a few improved Super Tomcat versions. The first was the Quickstrike, which would have been an F-14D with navigational and targeting pods, additional attach points for weapons, and added ground attack capabilities to its radar, turning the Tomcat into a multirole strike fighter. The Quickstrike was to fill the role of the A-6 Intruder after it was retired. This was not considered enough of an improvement by Congress, so the company shifted to the Super Tomcat 21 (ST-21) proposed design. The ST-21 was a proposed lower-cost alternative to the Navy Advanced Tactical Fighter (NATF), and would mostly have the same shape and body as the Tomcat, and an upgraded AN/APG-71 radar. The improved General Electric F110-GE-429 engines were to provide a supercruise speed of Mach 1.3 and featured thrust vectoring nozzles. The version would have reshaped leading-edge gloves, increased fuel capacity and modified control surfaces for improved takeoffs and lower landing approach speed. The Attack Super Tomcat 21 (AST-21) version was the last proposed Super Tomcat design and was meant to be a more attack-oriented version of the ST-21 with possibly an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar from the canceled A-12 attack aircraft. The (A)ST-21 was to be able to be rebuilt from existing F-14 airframes.
The last "Tomcat" variant was the ASF-14 (Advanced Strike Fighter-14), Grumman's replacement for the NATF concept. By all accounts, it would not be even remotely related to the previous Tomcats save in appearance, incorporating the new technology and design know-how from the Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) and Advanced Tactical Aircraft (ATA) programs. The ASF-14 would have been a new-build aircraft with considerably greater development costs; however, its projected capabilities were not that much better than that of the (A)ST-21 variants. Even Grumman was not enthusiastic about it. In the end, the proposed Super Tomcat variants were considered too costly and also faced stiff political opposition from the Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney. The Navy decided to pursue the cheaper F/A-18E/F Super Hornet to fill the fighter-attack or strike fighter role.”
Wikipedia
Controls:
Activation Group 1: Canopy
Activation Group 2: Refueling Probe
Activation Group 3: Tail Hook
Activation Group 4: Lights
Activation Group 5: Jettson Drop Tanks
Activation Group 6: Jettson Centerline Munitions
Activation Group 7: Ejection
Activation Group 8: Enable Wing Sweep
Loadout Options:
Air to Air Config 1: 4 AIM-9s, 6 AIM-120s
Air to Air Config 2: 2 AIM-9s, 6 AIM-54s, 2 AIM-120s
Air to Air Config 3: 2 AIM-9s, 14 AIM-120s
Air to Ground Config 1: 4 AIM-9s, 10 Boom 50s
Air to Ground Config 2: 2 AIM-9s, 2 AIM-120s, 6 AGM-84s
Air to Ground Config 3: 2 AIM-9s, 2 AIM-120s, 6 GBU-12s
Air to Ground Config 4: 2 AIM-9s, 2 AIM-120s, 4 GBU-12s, 42 Rockets

There's one more thing, when you download this plane, please play this track for me, would ya?

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor F-14 [PEA]
  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 67.7ft (20.6m)
  • Length 63.4ft (19.3m)
  • Height 16.4ft (5.0m)
  • Empty Weight 32,197lbs (14,604kg)
  • Loaded Weight 49,560lbs (22,480kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.36
  • Wing Loading 68.0lbs/ft2 (331.9kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 729.1ft2 (67.7m2)
  • Drag Points 2778

Parts

  • Number of Parts 421
  • Control Surfaces 6
  • Performance Cost 2,582
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    8,090 SimplePotato

    @UkrTehnoAir Apologies for the late reply, but you’re more than welcome to share this to others :)

    14 hours ago
  • Profile image
    15.5k UkrTehnoAir

    @SimplePotato Good evening, or day or night, do you mind if I publish your wonderful mod in the Telegram channel, your copyright will not be affected, the link to your profile will also be

    19 hours ago
  • Profile image
    8,090 SimplePotato

    Links for the weapons

    Harpoon missiles

    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/v83TmS/HARPOON

    AIM-54

    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/bPFD5v/Air-to-Air-Missile-pack

    Don’t recall where I found the GBU-12 :/

    22 hours ago
  • Profile image
    8,090 SimplePotato

    @StockPlanesRemastered There's no thrust vectoring on this as I wanted to differentiate it from the other swing wing naval fighter I have. It's still fairly agile for its size.

    yesterday
  • Profile image

    The ATS-21 also would have run into the same problem that plagued the F-14A. It's thrust vectoring nozzles would have made it too maneuverable for It's own good, leading to compressor stalls in the engines and possibly structural failure.

    yesterday