Profile image

[PEA] F-35 (with 35 parts)

66.0k TheMouse  1.2 years ago
Auto Credit Based on Maluch's [CLOSED] Name = Part Count Challenge

PART EFFICIENT AIRCRAFT!

At least, I think so. Monarchii’s phone still is misbehaving.


“The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is an American family of single-seat, single-engine, all-weather stealth multirole combat aircraft designed for air superiority and strike missions; it also has electronic warfare and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities. Lockheed Martin is the prime F-35 contractor with principal partners Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems. The aircraft has three main variants: the conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) F-35A, the short take-off and vertical-landing (STOVL) F-35B, and the carrier-based (CV/CATOBAR) F-35C.“ -Wikipedia


This was built to be the F-35A. I was actually building it since before the challenge, but since I just happened to have exactly 35 parts, and I saw this challenge, I decided to add it. I did not have enough space to add airbrakes, or chaff, or anything like that, as I could only have 35 parts, but I think it went fairly well, and certainly looks nice. I am not actually entirely sure if this will work as a PEA, but we will have to see what Monarchii says.
I hope you like it!

Spotlights

General Characteristics

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.708
  • Wing Loading 107.3lbs/ft2 (524.1kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 551.4ft2 (51.2m2)
  • Drag Points 2622

Parts

  • Number of Parts 35
  • Control Surfaces 6
  • Performance Cost 322
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    64.2k Maluch

    Name: Lockheed Martin F-35

    Type: Fighter Aircraft

    Does it match: Yes (35 Parts)

    Creator: @TheMouse


    Aesthetics: 7
    Build Quality: 6
    Details: 6
    Description: 3.5
    Accuracy: 80% = 8
    Extra: 2.5

    Overall: 33


    Pin this.

    Pinned 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    Chonky PEA F-35, I love it.

    Pinned 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,179 JayStream

    Top view : f-35
    Side view :f-35 & f-22
    Front view : Big chungus

    Pinned 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.2k BYardley

    NOICE 👌

    Pinned 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    66.0k TheMouse

    @Monarchii
    Here is another one. Your "to be decided" list is gonna be swamped.

    Pinned 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    THICC AMY

    (It's F-35's nickname "Fat Amy")

    Pinned 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    66.0k TheMouse

    All tags (except monarchii) were requested from my auto tag list. Click here to join or leave my list.

    Pinned 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    66.0k TheMouse

    @MobileBuilder21
    I see lol

    4 months ago
  • Profile image

    @TheMouse Bro it's a joke lol, also unless you got a simple air frame that kinda holds true with all low part planes.

    +1 4 months ago
  • Profile image
    66.0k TheMouse

    @MobileBuilder21
    Well…
    No.
    What I meant was, I am really bad at using just a few parts.
    I need at least 100 to be detailed.

    4 months ago
  • Profile image

    @TheMouse "35 parts is not enough for anything"... Are you challenging how well I can part Conserve? Do you want to see the 22 part F-22 mortal?

    4 months ago
  • Profile image
    66.0k TheMouse

    @MobileBuilder21
    Its trash lol. 35 parts is not enough for anything.

    4 months ago
  • Profile image

    Not the worst but a lil chonky... Like the render sent to minimum meme it has no features, it is the fuselage...

    +1 4 months ago
  • Profile image
    66.0k TheMouse

    @intruder72
    Er

    7 months ago
  • Profile image
    32.5k CUBErt

    mega chonKsTER

    7 months ago
  • Profile image
    66.0k TheMouse

    @BadahhMuscleCar001
    Thanks! Pinned.

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    Ok, who's chonker, PEA F-35 or PEA GeeBee

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    Fat plen

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TheMouse True true

    Edit: i have got this working plus 1 block to spare which could be used for a machine gun, airbrake, cms or just hiding the engine more using the piston

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    66.0k TheMouse

    @Cookiewinner9
    I was considering it. However, to make the jet rotate, and still look nice was a challenge I did not want to get into.

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    F a t

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    91.5k Monarchii

    @TheMouse hoho, low part; yea lmao, it's piling up terrifyingly, brrr. anyway I'll list it soon, brb

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    I see a missed opportunity

    If you removed those two fuselages on the inlets you could have added a hinge and gyroscope to make it VTOL. This is still pretty cool but just wanted to mention this.

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TheMouse Aight

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    66.0k TheMouse

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover
    Ok. I like the yak-9. I will make it.

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments