Profile image

Hawker Siddeley Trident

52.5k Tang0five  6.6 years ago

The mighty Trident, or how it should have been had we brits decided not to shoot ourselves in the testicles, once again. So many bad decisions made by government and various other heads of sheds I don't know where to begin. I suppose the first act of folly was giving a rival company (Boeing) all its research amidst talk of collaborating to create a tri jet airliner, something that allegedly amazed Boeing. (jolly good sports us brits!) The trident was designed to the specification of a powerful middle range passenger jet. In stepped BEA amid declining passenger numbers and petitions de haviland to make it smaller. A smaller design led to the engines being switched to the Rolls Royce Spey with a significant reduction in power, range and payload. Alternative engines were planned but the Gov at the time was trying to "rationalise" the industry and shelved the plans. As commercial aviation started to boom so did demand for longer range jets with greater capacity. This change eventually led to 5 different versions of the trident being built. Despite indecision, bad direction and shear bloody mindedness the trident was the first in many fields and a beautiful aircraft. First tri jet passenger liner, first aircraft to perform blind landings, advanced avionics way ahead of its time, one of the fastest subsonic commercial aircraft and the wing design was even taken for the A300.Ultimately the Trident lost out on sales to the 727 due to its limited market (namely BEA),its underpowered engines and government induced delays. The delays of which led to its major rival the 727 being introduced 2 months prior to the Trident. A terrible irony being the original design of the trident was pretty much what the 727 was made to. The former having 117 built, the latter 1,832. If only someone knew what we were doing we'd be bloody dangerous I tell you! Please see comments for controls.....

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Successors 5 airplane(s) +14 bonus
  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 58.7ft (17.9m)
  • Length 63.5ft (19.4m)
  • Height 14.3ft (4.3m)
  • Empty Weight 21,059lbs (9,552kg)
  • Loaded Weight 34,788lbs (15,779kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.356
  • Wing Loading 25.2lbs/ft2 (123.0kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 1,380.9ft2 (128.3m2)
  • Drag Points 12128

Parts

  • Number of Parts 168
  • Control Surfaces 9
  • Performance Cost 744
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    5,967 ayou2005

    @Tang0five can you add the logo it’s hard putting a logo on the plane for me

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    52.5k Tang0five

    Yeah if I were to have built this nowadays I’d be inclined to make custom landing gear to simulate that. @Anawin094

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    645 Anawin094

    The nose wheel is to be off center and retract to the right. But great livery.

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    52.5k Tang0five

    Thanks! @SSSvaSSa

    6.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    52.5k Tang0five

    Thanks buddy! @Trainzo

    6.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    38.6k Trainzo

    Just waouhhhhhh . Very nice realization .

    6.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    Well @Tang0five you sure take alot time for them i mostly take an hour but my planes have only 40% the detail output... ;3

    6.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    52.5k Tang0five

    Thank you @MakeshiftPlanes - this particular one took my evenings for about four days from start to finish. I do a fair bit of research for the description and fixing any performance issues typically takes a couple of hours. The BEA tail art was a pain but worth it!

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    Question : how long do you take to build such a awesome creation?

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    34.5k GhostHTX

    I, sir, am neither. But it was nice of you say... @Tang0five

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    52.5k Tang0five

    @GhostHTX your a gentleman and a scholar!

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    34.5k GhostHTX

    Wizard kite, old boy. Bloody well done.

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    101k Wallaby

    @Tang0five yep XD

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    52.5k Tang0five

    @Feanor thanks buddy!

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    52.5k Tang0five

    Sorry @ForeverPie what I mean is when you upload you get your screenshot in the main picture and then you get what you've uploaded in the next plan view style box next to specs and it always highlights inaccuracies that you've overlooked!

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    101k Wallaby

    "The plan view you get once uploaded makes my skin crawl sometimes!"

    Can you rephrase that please?

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    52.5k Tang0five

    @SgtK @QingyuZhou @ForeverPie and @Kimwonbae12 thanks guys! Any improvements let me know! The plan view you get once uploaded makes my skin crawl sometimes!....

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Tang0five no problem!

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    52.5k Tang0five

    You're a gent and a scholar thank you! @MrSilverWolf

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    Awesome!

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    52.5k Tang0five

    @SVT13 thanks buddy!

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    52.5k Tang0five

    Thanks @Rhombus I try to do less common ones as it can get a bit tiresome seeing p-51s....

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,402 ItsZander

    This is one of the first of these planes I've seen on here! Great work!

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    52.5k Tang0five

    @EpicPigster1 and @RCBOSS thanks guys!

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    52.5k Tang0five

    Continuing from description - Controls: VTOL down flaps, number 8 for lights. I've tried to replicate the auto land feature and it's as follows. Throttle about 8%, flaps at the first marker down, full pitch trim down. As she gets down near the wicket gently increase flaps to increase the flare for wheels down. These are ball park figures and may need adjusting depending on approach. Apologies about the unrealistic landing gear, the actual trident had an offset nose wheel and the main gear had quite a unique system of stowage I am not able to replicate. Throttle fully back for "reverse thrust buckets" which you and I both know are speed breaks!

    6.6 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments