Auto Credit Based on hapymeee's long distance
Original design and the original Long distance by @planemack
I took a liking to the original, and wondered at the result were there drag-optimised nose, rounded wingtips, coaxial rotors, and airbrakes. The answer is speed at the cost of increased weight, ergo worsened glide ratio.
Specifications
Spotlights
- hapymeee 7.0 years ago
General Characteristics
- Predecessor long distance
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 30.9ft (9.4m)
- Length 24.2ft (7.4m)
- Height 13.8ft (4.2m)
- Empty Weight 5,110lbs (2,318kg)
- Loaded Weight 6,091lbs (2,762kg)
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.656
- Wing Loading 43.2lbs/ft2 (211.0kg/m2)
- Wing Area 140.9ft2 (13.1m2)
- Drag Points 1673
Parts
- Number of Parts 33
- Control Surfaces 5
- Performance Cost 318
@Awsomur ikr lol
Interesting design and modifications. Those rounded wingtips are cool! I need to use them more.
@ParaParity cool