Profile image

Mcdonnell Douglas F-4E Phantom II

105k Hedero  3.4 years ago
Auto Credit Based on MAHADI's COLD WAR Challenge [CLOSED]

This is the first time I've ever done leading edge slats. So cut me some slack, they may be a little rough!




Brief History

The McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II is a tandem two-seat, twin-engine, all-weather, long-range supersonic jet interceptor and fighter-bomber originally developed for the United States Navy by McDonnell Aircraft. It first entered service in 1961 with the Navy.


Armament
2x AIM9E Missiles
1x 20mm M-61 "Vulcan"


Controls
1=Nav Lights
2=Arresting Hook
3=Wings Folding
4=Airbrakes
5=Drag Chute
6=Jettison fuel tanks
G=LandingGear
VTOL=Flaps


I hope you guys enjoy this build! The only thing I forgot to do was to make the missile launch button say AIM9E. But that's not a big deal I don't guess. And it's my submission to the challenge but I don't expect to win, just for fun as always!


General Characteristics

  • Predecessor COLD WAR Challenge [CLOSED]
  • Successors 2 airplane(s) +21 bonus
  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 38.6ft (11.8m)
  • Length 63.0ft (19.2m)
  • Height 17.6ft (5.4m)
  • Empty Weight 28,933lbs (13,123kg)
  • Loaded Weight 64,092lbs (29,071kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.612
  • Wing Loading 82.7lbs/ft2 (403.8kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 775.0ft2 (72.0m2)
  • Drag Points 6768

Parts

  • Number of Parts 511
  • Control Surfaces 3
  • Performance Cost 2,051
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    105k Hedero

    To all the mods: All tags were requested from a previous teaser post.

    Pinned 3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    105k Hedero

    Lol thanks @DarthAbhinav

    +1 3.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.6k DarthAbhinav

    I can't believe I didn't upvote this pog build.

    3.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    152k MAHADI

    @Hedero np!

    3.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    105k Hedero

    Thank you so much! @MAHADI

    3.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    152k MAHADI

    Impressive work on the details!

    3.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    152k MAHADI

    RATING

    Looks : 9.25/10 pts.
    Performance : 9/10 pts.
    Details : 9.5/10 pts.
    Weaponry : 9.1/10 pts.
    Functionality : 9.45/10 pts.
    Description :8.95/10 pts.
    Bonus : 9.25/10 pts. (Details)

    OVERALL RATING : 9.21/10

    +1 3.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    41.8k Ren

    @DieDieTheLoaf
    god dammit the autocorrect

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.0k 52

    lol ok @DieDieTheLoaf

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    When did I say he had mouth problems? Maybe auto correct idk@Skylerthedrawer

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    105k Hedero

    Hmm idk@Skylerthedrawer

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.0k 52

    Oh he said so @Hedero

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    105k Hedero

    No I don't think so?@Skylerthedrawer

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.0k 52

    Your brothers mouth? @Hedero

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    105k Hedero

    Alright I managed to reach a top speed of about 720-723 mph at sea level and I'm happy with that so thanks for the help!@edensk

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    105k Hedero

    Well our cat did have an accident but I don't know about my mouth@Skylerthedrawer

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.0k 52

    or was that your cat @Hedero

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    105k Hedero

    My mouth problems?@Skylerthedrawer

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.0k 52

    Sorry about your cat and your mouth problems i have mouth problems too

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.4k edensk

    @Hedero 905 mph at sea level, minimum fuel load and clean, adjust the drag for that

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    105k Hedero

    Should I mess around with the engines maximum? It's only getting about 300mph at level flight. And of course it needs 920 something mph realistically. I did realistic weight and the calculations for the engine multiplier thrust but it's still not getting that top speed.@edensk

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    105k Hedero

    Yeah I was having some issues with the tracking while testing. I wasn't sure why they would fly like they do but there's not much I can do about it :/@DanDaFreakinMan

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    Looks great, flies alright, the missiles are a bit of an idiot though

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    105k Hedero

    I wouldn't exactly advise anyone to void their stomach contents onto this recently polished airplane but if you did I would just hire someone to spray it off with a pressure washer and re-polish it so no biggie.@FusionFire

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    105k Hedero

    Thanks for the help dude. And funny enough I was searching yt to see a landing gear retract test on the f100 and I found your video. Your f-100 from what I can see looks absolutely beautiful. All I know is that the landing gear is driving me nuts but I just have to take my time on it.@edensk

    +1 3.4 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments