Profile image

Mcdonnell Douglas F-4E Phantom II

106k Hedero  5.0 years ago
Auto Credit Based on MAHADI's COLD WAR Challenge [CLOSED]

This is the first time I've ever done leading edge slats. So cut me some slack, they may be a little rough!




Brief History

The McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II is a tandem two-seat, twin-engine, all-weather, long-range supersonic jet interceptor and fighter-bomber originally developed for the United States Navy by McDonnell Aircraft. It first entered service in 1961 with the Navy.


Armament
2x AIM9E Missiles
1x 20mm M-61 "Vulcan"


Controls
1=Nav Lights
2=Arresting Hook
3=Wings Folding
4=Airbrakes
5=Drag Chute
6=Jettison fuel tanks
G=LandingGear
VTOL=Flaps


I hope you guys enjoy this build! The only thing I forgot to do was to make the missile launch button say AIM9E. But that's not a big deal I don't guess. And it's my submission to the challenge but I don't expect to win, just for fun as always!


General Characteristics

  • Predecessor COLD WAR Challenge [CLOSED]
  • Successors 2 airplane(s) +21 bonus
  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 38.6ft (11.8m)
  • Length 63.0ft (19.2m)
  • Height 17.6ft (5.4m)
  • Empty Weight 28,933lbs (13,123kg)
  • Loaded Weight 64,092lbs (29,071kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.612
  • Wing Loading 82.7lbs/ft2 (403.8kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 775.0ft2 (72.0m2)
  • Drag Points 6768

Parts

  • Number of Parts 511
  • Control Surfaces 3
  • Performance Cost 2,051
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    106k Hedero

    To all the mods: All tags were requested from a previous teaser post.

    Pinned 5.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    106k Hedero

    Lol thanks @DarthAbhinav

    +2 4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.7k DarthAbhinav

    I can't believe I didn't upvote this pog build.

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    159k MAHADI

    @Hedero np!

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    106k Hedero

    Thank you so much! @MAHADI

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    159k MAHADI

    Impressive work on the details!

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    159k MAHADI

    RATING

    Looks : 9.25/10 pts.
    Performance : 9/10 pts.
    Details : 9.5/10 pts.
    Weaponry : 9.1/10 pts.
    Functionality : 9.45/10 pts.
    Description :8.95/10 pts.
    Bonus : 9.25/10 pts. (Details)

    OVERALL RATING : 9.21/10

    +1 4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.0k Skyler101

    lol ok @DieDieTheLoaf

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    When did I say he had mouth problems? Maybe auto correct idk@Skylerthedrawer

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    106k Hedero

    Hmm idk@Skylerthedrawer

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.0k Skyler101

    Oh he said so @Hedero

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    106k Hedero

    No I don't think so?@Skylerthedrawer

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.0k Skyler101

    Your brothers mouth? @Hedero

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    106k Hedero

    Alright I managed to reach a top speed of about 720-723 mph at sea level and I'm happy with that so thanks for the help!@edensk

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    106k Hedero

    Well our cat did have an accident but I don't know about my mouth@Skylerthedrawer

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.0k Skyler101

    or was that your cat @Hedero

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    106k Hedero

    My mouth problems?@Skylerthedrawer

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.0k Skyler101

    Sorry about your cat and your mouth problems i have mouth problems too

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.6k edensk

    @Hedero 905 mph at sea level, minimum fuel load and clean, adjust the drag for that

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    106k Hedero

    Should I mess around with the engines maximum? It's only getting about 300mph at level flight. And of course it needs 920 something mph realistically. I did realistic weight and the calculations for the engine multiplier thrust but it's still not getting that top speed.@edensk

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    106k Hedero

    Yeah I was having some issues with the tracking while testing. I wasn't sure why they would fly like they do but there's not much I can do about it :/@DanDaFreakinMan

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    Looks great, flies alright, the missiles are a bit of an idiot though

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    106k Hedero

    I wouldn't exactly advise anyone to void their stomach contents onto this recently polished airplane but if you did I would just hire someone to spray it off with a pressure washer and re-polish it so no biggie.@FusionFire

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    106k Hedero

    Thanks for the help dude. And funny enough I was searching yt to see a landing gear retract test on the f100 and I found your video. Your f-100 from what I can see looks absolutely beautiful. All I know is that the landing gear is driving me nuts but I just have to take my time on it.@edensk

    +1 5.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.6k edensk

    @Hedero take the thrust without burner, 10200 lbf, divide it by the SP engine thrust, that's the multiplier for the main engine. take the burner's thrust, 5800 lbf, divide it by the vtol engine's thrust, there's the multiplier for the afterburner.
    I would send you my own wip Hun but I wanna see what you come up with lol

    5.0 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments