Profile image

SR-71 Blackbird v03

197k SledDriver  5.9 years ago
984 downloads
No Tags
Auto Credit Based on SledDriver's SR-77 Blackbird II

Now with more corrugations.




Controls

  • Custom camera 1: Cockpit view
  • AG1: Afterburner
  • AG2: High agility mode
  • FireGuns: Fire plasma cannons

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor SR-77 Blackbird II
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 73.6ft (22.4m)
  • Length 125.1ft (38.1m)
  • Height 20.9ft (6.4m)
  • Empty Weight N/A
  • Loaded Weight 217,322lbs (98,576kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.93
  • Wing Loading 21.9lbs/ft2 (107.1kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 9,902.8ft2 (920.0m2)
  • Drag Points 220628

Parts

  • Number of Parts 484
  • Control Surfaces 9
  • Performance Cost 1,718
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    @temporaryaccount I don't know about the shocked part -- resentful is more like it -- and it was 1.4 years ago, by the way. As for the pixel-blocks script, I don't have it.

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    @temporaryaccount Well, different people value different things, I suppose.

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    @lancelot3340 Numbers. It's just numbers.

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.1k lancelot3340

    how you made it so smooth!!!

    +1 5.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    @horizoneer True.

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    American engineering at its finest

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,037 bang091

    @horizoneer check this out

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k soundwave

    @SledDriver oh yeah, I get you there

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    @atgxtg Yeah, I'm sure there are lots of other ways to use this concept.

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,514 atgxtg

    Clever. It would be great for some sort of escape vehicle too.

    With the proper mix of engines, vectors and timing you could actually make an "engine" that varies it's output throughout a flight. Not sure why, someone would want to, but it's a neat concept.

    +1 5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    Thanks, @atgxtg. The speed boost at takeoff (and afterburner) is because of an engine configuration I use to get super-high thrust at startup, that rapidly winds down to a more normal level. I did this because I wanted to have near-instant acceleration and deceleration. I call it the "Sled Drive" :)

    The way it works is this: let's say your desired cruise speed is 1,000 mph, and that your aircraft needs 50,000 lbs of thrust to maintain that speed. But with that amount of thrust, it takes forever to reach its cruise speed. So you place one engine pointing backwards with a very high thrust, say 500,000 lbs, and a very low spin-up time, say 0.01 seconds. You place another engine in the same position but pointing forward, so that it cancels the first engine's thrust. For the second engine, you set the effective thrust to 450,000 lbs, and the spin-up time to, say, 0.5 seconds. Now when you switch on this two-engine configuration, the first engine provides you 500,000 lbs of thrust instantaneously, while the other engine spins up over half a second and in that time brings the total effective thrust down to 50,000 lbs, your "cruise" level.

    The beauty of this system is that you can add more engines in this paired configuration to get more cruise speed levels. And it only takes half a second to switch between speeds. With my aircraft, the default cruise speed is around 1,000 mph, and if you enable AG1, it takes you very quickly to around 3,800 mph. Disabling AG1 takes you back to 1,000 mph just as quickly.

    +2 5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    Thanks, @Treadmill103. Getting closer and closer every time...

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    @BaconRoll Thanks. Personally, I don't like the Raptor's nose/cockpit configuration -- it looks a little 'beaky' to me. I prefer the larger, rounded nose shapes, although I get that they're not as stealthy and indicate less-advanced radar tech. Visually, the F-16 is one of my favourite fighters, along with the Su-27. I really like the "muscular neck" of the MiG-29 SMT, as well.

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,514 atgxtg

    Really nice! How did you get that speed boost at takeoff? It was like really taking off in a jet.

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k soundwave

    So pretty... this and the F-22 Raptor are so visually appealing

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    @CRJ900Pilot Yeah. Did I mention that they're wobbly as well? At least with heavy aircraft.

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    32.3k CRJ900Pilot

    Even if there eight less and dragless? @SledDriver

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    @CRJ900Pilot I have. They affect flight performance negatively, so I don't consider them worthwhile, especially considering they're only used for a few seconds.

    +1 5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    32.3k CRJ900Pilot

    Cool! I think you should try landing gear

    +1 5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.4k Ian1231100

    @SledDriver Agreed.

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    @Ian1231100 Yeah. To me, the SR-71 is the most beautiful airplane that ever existed.

    +2 5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.4k Ian1231100

    No wonder your username's SledDriver, you really love Blackbirds.

    5.9 years ago