Auto Credit Based on RamboJutter's Rambojutter Skyfalcon 4.3
Introduction
With the introduction of the A4 Sjyhawk the Americans had a small fast airframe capable of carrying out a number of roles and complementing the larger aircraft also carried by the associated aircraft carriers (F14 etc). It was decided that the Royal Navy could benefit from such an aircraft so the Skyfalcon was developed.
Controls
AG1 = reheat
AG2 = arm missiles and drop rockets(sorry had to double up on AG's)
AG3 = arrestor hook
AG4 = drop tanks
AG5 = airbrake
AG6 = nav lights
AG7 = drogue shoot
VTOL dn = flaps
Pictures
Big thanks to Edensk for their help and guidance with the flight model tweaking.
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Predecessor Rambojutter Skyfalcon 4.3
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 29.4ft (8.9m)
- Length 47.4ft (14.4m)
- Height 17.7ft (5.4m)
- Empty Weight 21,743lbs (9,862kg)
- Loaded Weight 29,596lbs (13,424kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 3.872
- Wing Loading 71.1lbs/ft2 (347.0kg/m2)
- Wing Area 416.5ft2 (38.7m2)
- Drag Points 1466
Parts
- Number of Parts 1107
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 4,283
@HeavyHeavytheC22 lol
Yeah we were just talking about names though my bad @AsteroidAsteroidTheBook
Yeah probably @AsteroidAsteroidTheBook
@HeavyHeavytheC22 I know. This is based loosely on the A-4
@Hedero Only in the military I guess
A4 is the sky hawk not sky falcon
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook
That is odd. I thought if an aircraft utilized the same name as another, they had to write II or III. @AsteroidAsteroidTheBook
Lol no probs m8 @RamboJutter
I find it funny that the A-4 and the C172 have the same name
@Hedero ah, thanks :) I definitely interpreted that wrong.
@Hedero Ah. I have no Idea.
No I meant why do his airplanes underperform on the website so much? Lol the way I said it is quite confusing sorry XD. @Fliegerkerlchen @RamboJutter
What do you deem to be underperforming on it? I originally had it accelerating faster and having a much higher top speed but on reflection this wasnt accurate to what i was trying to replicate. Or have i completely missed the point =)
@Fliegerkerlchen fixed, sorry I had intended to switch the rocket jettison to AG6 but in the end left it on AG2... oops.
@Hedero The A-4 is not that powerful at all, and a lot of the planes on SP.com are really overpowered. I tested a lot of the planes of RamboJutter, and at least I think their relatively realistic engine power.
Why do your builds underperform so much?
@RamboJutter Cool. Is it planned that AG2 activates the missiles and drops the right rocket pod?