Auto Credit Based on Glaceon's Incher-Interceptor "Hatred Of Peace"
27 mm guns took too long to take down bombers, so they decided the 27 mm would be used for dogfighting. For that case they installed an Anti-Air 105 mm gun in the nose to destroy bombers. This however lead to having to turn off power to the 27 mms (turn off acg 8) and then firing the 105 mm (acg 1), If the pilot failed to do this the recoil would have caused the plane serious damage. Now manouvers alot better thanks the little tips at the end :3
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Predecessor Incher-Interceptor "Hatred Of Peace"
- Created On Mac
- Wingspan 36.5ft (11.1m)
- Length 26.2ft (8.0m)
- Height 16.0ft (4.9m)
- Empty Weight 10,318lbs (4,680kg)
- Loaded Weight 18,254lbs (8,279kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 3.693
- Wing Loading 51.4lbs/ft2 (251.1kg/m2)
- Wing Area 355.0ft2 (33.0m2)
- Drag Points 2367
Parts
- Number of Parts 35
- Control Surfaces 5
- Performance Cost 339
@fisheads88 .P. Thx
your welcome :)
@MagicShadow101 thx
Just wait until there is... @Delphirier
Lol ok @Delphirier
@Seabo14 Nope too hard to add .-.
@Seabo14 ok den .-.
@ShatterFox USAF
RAF Maybe add some of these for the challenge?
@Pilotmario Ok lemme change that to a 200 caliber bullet. I'm not being biased OK? I wan something like the 50 mm they had on the me 262.
@ShatterFox I see you made a 100+ caliber bullet. The 30mm Mk 8 and Mk 9 in the files are listed as 100 caliber (it should be 1.18 to be more precise) in the files.
@Pilotmario Ik, I'm referencing there is no recoil IN THE GOD DAMN GAME, YET.
@ShatterFox Oh yes, a bullet has recoil. You know all the force that round has when it leaves the barrel?
That goes the other way too.
@Pilotmario There is no recoil m9, I'm tryin to be realistic m9, and It's not a 105 mm mortar! It's a 105 caliber bullet, HA!
@ShatterFox Good luck dealing with the recoil of that gun on such a small plane.
@Pilotmario Idk, All I know is it travels faster than 1000 mph
@ShatterFox What kind of 105mm cannon is it? High velocity or low velocity?
@Pilotmario Also this It's a 105 mm, the shrapnel from the bomber is pretty much gonna kill everything around it :3
@Pilotmario I just read the wiki, I knew that xD
@ShatterFox So you don't need to be so precise.
Rockets were never precise weapons.
A side note, it was realized that cannon and machine guns on fighters were inadequate against mass bomber raids, and found volleys of unguided rockets to be a marginally better solution. The US adopted this alongside guided missile systems and decided to take it a step further, creating the AIR-2 Genie. Because when you have something as precise as Hellen Keller with a MAC-10, the only recourse of action to ensure the target is damaged is through mass volley and splash damage.
Don't worry, this nuke is perfectly safe to fire over a city. Turns out the radiation increase by standing under a high-altitude blast of this weapon was completely negligible. During the only live test of this weapon, the people who received the highest doses of radiation were the aircrew who flew through the blast cloud 10 minutes after detonation.
@Pilotmario WTF IS THE POINT OF THAT? INSTALLING A NUCLEAR WARHEAD ON SOMETHING THATS "AIR-TO-AIR" WHY DO YOU WANT TO NUKE A PLANE?
@ShatterFox But the recoil...
Anyways, have you explored the concept of unguided rocket spam?
Or how about one with just a nuke? Like the AIR-2 Genie. It's safe to people over a city.
@Pilotmario Bcuz, I dislike missiles :3
np ^^
@VernalTie513 Thanks :3
@ShatterFox lol recoil.
Why not use a missile?