Profile image

Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II v 2.0

1,619 LockheedMartinAerospace  7.0 years ago
67 downloads
No Tags
Auto Credit Based on LockheedMartinAerospace's Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II

Re-did the scaling error

General Characteristics

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.68
  • Wing Loading 30.1lbs/ft2 (146.7kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 1,648.2ft2 (153.1m2)
  • Drag Points 4211

Parts

  • Number of Parts 50
  • Control Surfaces 4
  • Performance Cost 379
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    3,342 KabyLakeE

    @LockheedMartinAerospace Actualy your wrong about the point of the F-35. the point of the aircraft is to be a Jack-of-all-trades plane. it does everything OK not good but OK.
    Its assigning an SR-71 to be a dogfighter or a heavy bomber or a ground attacker. But in reality its a stealth jet for recon. The only good thing the F-35 can do is ground attack.

    6.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @KabyLakeE I also do my research; the previous comment was my opinion.

    6.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    3,342 KabyLakeE

    @LockheedMartinAerospace It suffers to do that. Do you research?

    6.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @KabyLakeE The point of the F-35 is to hide and engage FROM LONG-RANGE, not much into dogfighting maneuverability. That is why it is not a Mach 2 fighter; it has to be slow to spend more time far away.

    6.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    3,342 KabyLakeE

    @LockheedMartinAerospace No the real one.

    6.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @KabyLakeE Check again: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/9W2167/Lockheed-Martin-F-35A-Lightning-II

    6.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    3,342 KabyLakeE

    @LockheedMartinAerospace Also the real f35 is really bad.

    6.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    3,342 KabyLakeE

    @LockheedMartinAerospace Usually a replica is made with way more than 50 parts. I've made some primitive replicas and 75% of them are over 100 parts. Some even 300 parts. But calling this a replica would be like calling sand a replica of the human body. Just saying...

    6.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    3,342 KabyLakeE

    This is not even close to a replica.

    6.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @KDS Thanks

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,338 KDS

    Congrats on silver!

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @LockheedMartinAerospace Nice. I had a plane like this posted, but looking back, I realize that it was actually a Raptor (Currently deleted for lack of upvotes/downloads/comments).

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.6k Pjork

    This is so cool!

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @t8erh8er https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/7cdsCq/YF-23

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @t8erh8er Check some of my other ones, then.

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @t8erh8er ikr.

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @t8erh8er Anyways, would be much harder is KSP

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    and the wing area isn't right.....

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    yeah lol @t8erh8er

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @t8erh8er What I meant was the scaling was off, not the entire design.

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @MechWARRIOR57 Try adding 1 single pound. And on my info tab in SP, it says 49,540 lbs.

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    but your loaded weight isn't right.... xD

    7.0 years ago