Profile image

No Fuselage Challenge Aircraft - Project ''Echo''

121k AWESOMENESS360  3.9 years ago
Auto Credit Based on Shadodoom's No Fuselage Challenge (CLOSED)

Entry for the “No Fuselage Challenge”.

Project Echo was an attempt at a cheap, cost effective fighter aircraft that could be deployed in massive numbers. The main idea was to completely overwhelm the enemy and have intimidation strength in numbers. One individual Echo would last all of five seconds against the world’s greatest fifth gen fighters. On the contrary however, several Echoes, let’s say 20-50 of them, would easily be able to overpower and overwhelm any aircraft by sheer numbers alone, despite their relatively small weaponry, being armed with only a 20mm.

Controls: Normal aircraft controls, nothing special. This aircraft was designed to be simple enough to be run on any device, yet look good enough to be enjoyable to fly. Keep in mind, this aircraft uses no fuselage blocks whatsoever, so think about that first before you jump to conclusions and say it looks bad.

One more thing I should probably mention is that this aircraft can take off and land without landing gear, just as long as you’re careful enough. It’s also really good at low-speed gliding, so landing softly shouldn’t be an issue.

Have Fun!

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor No Fuselage Challenge (CLOSED)
  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 41.0ft (12.5m)
  • Length 55.2ft (16.8m)
  • Height 14.1ft (4.3m)
  • Empty Weight N/A
  • Loaded Weight 2,831lbs (1,284kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 7.936
  • Wing Loading 4.8lbs/ft2 (23.2kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 594.7ft2 (55.3m2)
  • Drag Points 3538

Parts

  • Number of Parts 33
  • Control Surfaces 4
  • Performance Cost 133
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @L3dg3ndary thanks!

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.2k Shadodoom

    Good job on getting second!

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @MiladicPlanes I like the game, but I can’t play it since I don’t have a PC.

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    Are you a TF2 fan?

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.2k Shadodoom

    @Pugman don't be a jerk. This isn't your build to judge. If it's not impressive, then could you build it?

    +1 3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Pugman I was never trying to be impressive. I’m just utilizing the resources I have to improve the performance of my aircraft.

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    0 Pugman

    @AWESOMENESS360 yeah but a lot of people have done so it's not that impressive

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Pugman it says you can use XML. The only real rule here regarding parts is that you can’t use fuselage blocks.

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @MercuryCorporation thanks!

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    0 Pugman

    He used a cheat fuel tank

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @L3dg3ndary aight, sounds good!

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.2k Shadodoom

    No fuselages - yes
    Flight: 9 / 10 because it flies really straight but could be just a little more maneuverable
    Looks: 7 / 10 because it has a nice, smooth shape but not a lot of extra detail
    Extra details: 2 / 5 because it has minor, but still very clean details (and only 33 parts)!

    TOTAL SCORE: 20 / 25 because it is a mobile friendly, minimalistic, futuristic fighter jet that flies really good. With the addition of more detail, it could easily have a higher score. 2 Extra points were added because it is supposed To be mobile friendly and not filled with details

    +1 3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @L3dg3ndary thanks!

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.2k Shadodoom

    Ok I’m mega impressed By how this has 33 parts. I’m scoring it right now

    3.9 years ago