Profile image

Creysler MX-80A MK-2

15.0k AviationLoverGEEK444  2 months ago
30 downloads
No Tags
Auto Credit Based on AviationLoverGEEK444's Creysler MX-80B MK-1

Modifications such as better armor, better gun, better engine, better Stabalizer, and better real pad speed

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor Creysler MX-80B MK-1
  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 20.3ft (6.2m)
  • Length 46.6ft (14.2m)
  • Height 20.2ft (6.2m)
  • Empty Weight N/A
  • Loaded Weight 19,026lbs (8,630kg)

Performance

  • Wing Loading 18,854.4lbs/ft2 (92,055.2kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 1.0ft2 (0.1m2)
  • Drag Points 13209

Parts

  • Number of Parts 182
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 898
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    48.7k Unwanted

    @SchmooveBrain yes. There is only around 250 in service, so it’s a test. And the manufacturer has stated the tech is a little advanced for our current tech.

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @BOSKnight okay so not as flawed, but still decently flawed

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image
    48.7k Unwanted

    @SchmooveBrain the commander could hand load it, but it would take 40 seconds. One other thing is it has a “donkey motor” so when, in the case of an engine hit or just the engine is off, there is a secondary motor in the front that keeps the auto loader running.

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @BOSKnight okay so extremely flawed

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    8,369 Supersoli8

    Cool

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    48.7k Unwanted

    @SchmooveBrain fully auto.

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @BOSKnight is it a fully automatic loader or could a crewmember theoretically hand-load it?

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image
    48.7k Unwanted

    @SchmooveBrain @AviationLoverGEEK444 My MBT-70 has a major flaw though. The gun has to [Auto] goes back to 0 degrees to reload.

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image
    48.7k Unwanted

    @SchmooveBrain look 👇

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    48.7k Unwanted

    @AviationLoverGEEK444 My MBT-70’s quick stats.

    Autoloader:

    The auto loader loads and removes shells from the breach in one-2 seconds. [One for the first shell, 2 for the last.] The ready rack is in the back and hull floor of the tank. The rack holds 3 shells, and the tank holds 30 shells including the ready rack.

    The gun:

    The gun is a 150mm anti tank cannon, has a short stop stabilization system for the vertical axis, and a X axis full stabilization. Elevation: 28 degrees. Depression: 10 degrees.

    Armor:

    The armor is the same as the GAMBIT.

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @AviationLoverGEEK444 yeah, the Condor isn't special in that field, do you see where this is going?

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @SchmooveBrain I know I have a delta winged plane

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @AviationLoverGEEK444 also, some more proof
    1 year more than what it is currently (1951)

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @BOSKnight now ur taking this way too seriously

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @BOSKnight but it’s auto loader isn’t as good, it’s armor isn’t as good, no gun stab

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    48.7k Unwanted

    @AviationLoverGEEK444 this is the realism you have to take account for.

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @AviationLoverGEEK444 and? Realistically, your Mk2 is weaker than the Mk1
    Also, further proof the Condor isn't exactly radical

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    48.7k Unwanted

    @AviationLoverGEEK444 @SchmooveBrain yes. The MBT-70 is as heavy as the M1A4 sep v3. Around 6-70 tonnes. Top speed: 40 Miles an hour.

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @SchmooveBrain ok this is getting a lot more complicated

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @AviationLoverGEEK444 delta wings and tailless designs aren't tied to a specific timeframe, look at the nazis if you have to


    The MBT-70 can be it's own pack of worms, though you're claiming utter superiority on a tank with less weight, proving use of weaker materials, which makes most of it negligible to begin with, but then tack on this modification with almost completely paper changes, that don't increase weight, making it therefore weaker, especially the better armor

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @BOSKnight or just taking?

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    48.7k Unwanted

    @AviationLoverGEEK444 yes. Compared to mine.

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image
    48.7k Unwanted

    @SchmooveBrain ah!

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @BOSKnight studying my design and tech?

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @SchmooveBrain what?

    2 months ago
  • Log in to see more comments