Profile image

Lockheed L-133 StarJet

42.1k Hahahahaahahshs  2.0 years ago

hi again I'm done with this catfish lookin plane so yeah

History (stole from the wiki)

The Lockheed L-133 was an exotic design started in 1939 which was proposed to be the first jet fighter of the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) during World War II. The radical design was to be powered by two axial-flow turbojets with an unusual blended wing-body canard design capable of 612 mph (985 km/h) in level flight. The USAAF rejected the 1942 proposal, but the effort speeded the development of the USAAF's first successful operational jet fighter, the P-80 Shooting Star, which did see limited service near the end of war. The P-80 was a less radical design with a single British-based Allison J33 engine, with a conventional tail.

Photos

I see nothing different

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 43.7ft (13.3m)
  • Length 41.4ft (12.6m)
  • Height 12.9ft (3.9m)
  • Empty Weight N/A
  • Loaded Weight 9,738lbs (4,417kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 3.877
  • Wing Loading 9.4lbs/ft2 (45.9kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 1,036.0ft2 (96.3m2)
  • Drag Points 3043

Parts

  • Number of Parts 258
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Performance Cost 1,084
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @TheAviator77 danke

    1.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TheAviator77 also that is the reason i believe that CATFISH IS A VACUUM CLEANER

    1.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TheAviator77 agreeed

    1.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TheAviator77 no seriously I searched it up Here

    1.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TheAviator77

    YES

    YES

    YES

    1.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TheAviator77

    NO IT IS A VACUUM CLEANER IT MUST

    1.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TheAviator77 also how long is this going to go on for??

    1.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TheAviator77

    YES

    1.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TheAviator77

    YES

    1.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TheAviator77 to bad it is now >:)

    1.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @FANNY112 yes

    +1 1.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.8k RyooSensei

    Dang, your one of the user who builds a
    L-133

    1.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    OOOHH MYYY GOOD FLYING HOOVER

    +1 1.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.1k Hatsy

    No doubt that it will clean the enemy zones

    +1 2.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    They should have called it vacuum of stingray

    2.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    58.6k Cabbage17

    Vacuum cleaner tag when

    +1 2.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TheOfficalMarylander why not

    2.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    Hey, this aint a plane! Why are you making vaccum cleaners now?

    2.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    45.3k 42

    Funky lil’ guy

    2.0 years ago