Profile image

(Failed) Heavy Transport Concept

17.4k Geekpride  7.6 years ago
Auto Credit Based on Pilotmario's Scorpion Light Tank M4A2(90) Parachute Contest

Use the trim slider to open the rear doors. Activation groups 1, 2 and 3 drop the tanks - though activating group 3 results in the destruction of the plane.

This is NOT my entry for the tank drop challenge - it's a failed experiment that I thought was interesting enough to share.

This plane was never actually produced as a whole by Geekpride Fabrications, this computer simulation model is based on engineering studies carried out to investigate the possibility of submitting a new, multi-purpose heavy transport as a design for the tank airdropping contest. The studies identified many problems with this approach, including:

1 - The size and bulk of any such design would require extremely powerful engines. Current propulsion systems may not be capable of this performance.

2 - The insistence of the Paternian forces that the tank clamps be connected to any landing gear controls is both bizarre and problematic. Any landing gear could not be retracted until after the tanks have been airdropped, otherwise the tanks become loose in flight and pose a high risk of damaging the aircraft.

3 - Airdropping tanks from the rear doors is possible, but risky. The two tanks nearest the door can be deployed without significant problems, but the third one would almost invariably wreck the plane.

4 - The flight characteristics of the design are not very good. It is flyable and controllable, but it is not easy.


Recommendations:

Abandon the concept of a new heavy transport. It is not easily achievable with current technology, and would be highly expensive to develop and produce. Projected performance is not good enough to justify this. A more productive approach would be to create a single-purpose, cheap airplane that is simpler and represents more effective use of resources.

General Characteristics

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.524
  • Wing Loading 51.2lbs/ft2 (249.9kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 5,019.4ft2 (466.3m2)
  • Drag Points 71273

Parts

  • Number of Parts 812
  • Control Surfaces 18
  • Performance Cost 4,917
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    17.2k TemDesBur

    @Geekpride thats the thing with transport planes that hold other vehicles inside

    7.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.4k Geekpride

    @Pilotmario It doesn't matter that much, this design wasn't going to work anyway. I'm now thinking of a much smaller and simpler plane with fixed landing gear.

    7.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    147k Pilotmario

    Whoops for the oversight. I linked the clamps to LandingGear because VTOL and Trim were used for tank controls. @Geekpride

    7.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.4k Geekpride

    @TemDesBur It would be cool - if it worked. Sadly, it tends to destroy itself.

    7.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.2k TemDesBur

    lol, @Pilotmario this is cool!

    7.6 years ago