The NWA NA-XSA
Advanced Small Airliner Experiment

(NA-XSA Flushed/Fused Engine Design Close-Up)
Features :
• Strong And Rigged
• Cheap To Produce And Maintain
• Eco Friendly (Thanks To The Low-Drag Single Engine Configuration)
• Highly Comfortable
Description :
The New World Aerospace NA-XSA (Advanced Small Airliner Experiment) Is A 130 Seater Turbofan-Powered Experimental Airliner. Proposed For Civilian, A Unique Design With Only One Large Turbofan That Is Flushed/Fused With The Tail Section For Lowering The Maintainance Cost (Fewer Engine Numbers) And Fuel Consumption (Fuselage-Flushed/Fused Engine Eliminates Drag From The Engine). Boasting Low Cost And High Availability While Maintaining The Quality (Comfort) And Efficiency High.
AG Controls :
AG-1 : Lights
AG-2 : Reverse Thrust
AG-3 : N/A
AG-4 : N/A
AG-5 : N/A
AG-6 : N/A
AG-7 : N/A
AG-8 : Weapon Arm
Payload :
• N/A
Weapons
Note :
• This Is Fully My Creation
• This Aircraft Use ReinMcDeer Styled Control (Trim As Flap, VTOL As Trim )
• Always Watch Your Fuel Gauge
Thankyou For Downloading
Fly Like An Eagle, Fight Like A Falcon !
Dance With The Angel !
~ Fadel
Contact : Look At Profile
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On Android
- Wingspan 110.0ft (33.5m)
- Length 114.0ft (34.7m)
- Height 34.2ft (10.4m)
- Empty Weight 39,067lbs (17,720kg)
- Loaded Weight 59,070lbs (26,794kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 0.313
- Wing Loading 36.0lbs/ft2 (176.0kg/m2)
- Wing Area 1,638.7ft2 (152.2m2)
- Drag Points 4372
Parts
- Number of Parts 104
- Control Surfaces 11
- Performance Cost 738
This Is An Pre-Production Prototype !
It's Still Far From Perfect And Will Be Developed Further (Soon)
Any Modification Is Strictly Prohibited !
@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore No Differential Thrust (Like In Twin/Tri/Quadjets) So... No Problem ;)
What if the engine fails 😨
a new glizzy wohooo
@KPLBall Sure !
@nwa can I get put on your auto tag list?
Also when it is ready, I'll take 2
@Boeing727200F Imagine Slapping An Average A320/757 Engine On A Tail Of An MD-80. Thats This In Nutshell :
@nwa "I Reduced The Engine Weight So It Wont Bring The COT Too Far To Aft"
that explains it.
imma see what happens if i add it bac-
plane pulls PSMs and flips out of controll and crashes
@Boeing727200F To Be Honest, Kinda Cheating On That Part, I Reduced The Engine Weight So It Wont Bring The COT Too Far To Aft, Also I Moved The Wing Further Back (MD-80 -like) To Keep The COT-COL Distance As Optimal As Possible ;)
(Kinda Complex Tho)
im surprised the plane isnt tail heavy
Honorable Mentions
: @KorKaiorWhatever , @KPLBall
Honorable Mentions
: @SuperSuperTheSylph , @MonsNotTheMonster , @Mahoots
Honorable Mentions
: @Maverick09 , MAPA (No Longer Active) , @LunarEclipseSP