Auto Credit Based on Oicraftian's More Complete than before, endgoal undetermined
Full description will come once it has been fully revised and edited (When I feel like putting it in).
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Predecessor More Complete than before, endgoal undetermined
- Created On Android
- Wingspan 28.9ft (8.8m)
- Length 150.1ft (45.7m)
- Height 53.0ft (16.2m)
- Empty Weight 7,043lbs (3,195kg)
- Loaded Weight 85,509lbs (38,786kg)
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.035
- Wing Loading 120.5lbs/ft2 (588.5kg/m2)
- Wing Area 709.4ft2 (65.9m2)
- Drag Points 15938
Parts
- Number of Parts 231
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 661
Insane!!!!
@Oicraftian Its fine.
@AlphaOneIndustries sorry for wasting space on your comments section. Tribal is still exceedingly bitter because of my first review on his "Bf 109" which he appears to have put next to no time or effort into.
@Oicraftian technically yes.
@Tribaldragon Alright. I'll give an honest review. Your "Bf 109" doesn't even have the proper landing gear arrangement. The wings are far too set backwards leading to a heavy nose which tends to kill the plane on take off. The fuselage looks like it was taken from a cartoon plane at best and it's slow AND slow to maneuver. All in all, it is a horrendous build that should not have even passed prototype stage. Most of your planes follow this. Not only this, you are the resident git, I swear, you are impressively toxic to EVERYONE. I won't even start on your claim that my aircraft look bricky, because according to that logic a Zero is bricky.
You are literally the least helpful person in all of existence. You never bothered to say how to improve the craft, just said "f... you, I'm amazing!" and insulted it, despite your planes all looking twice as brick-y as mine. So if you think you even slightly deserve praise, you can go f... yourself with a cactus. @Oicraftian
Define better. If that means better at being bad, I am in agreement. If you mean ground handling, flying characteristics and other factors no. Also, at the worst I gave an optimistic review of a plane that was not only nose heavy but could have every single issue fixed in less than 5 minutes. @Tribaldragon1
@AlphaOneIndustries I see. So you downloaded my boat. Tore it to tiny little fragments and built a master piece yes? :-)
@Oicraftian he said, continuously insulting my plane and skills, despite my numerous better planes.
@Oicraftian I had seen the hull you uploaded and decided to save it. Unfortunately I just now realized I should have saved it as a sub-assembly.
@Tribaldragon1 considering you insulted my aircraft without good justification, as if you had not noticed your own aircraft had an extremely easy fix called moving the wings forward. Then proceeded to insult the Bf 109 with your brick, I don't understand how you believe you yourself are innocent. Not to mention the numerous personal attacks and the fact I previously up voted your brick.
@AlphaOneIndustries I'd like to know why your piece of art is apparently some kind of successor to my incomplete ship hull attempt. I don't get it.
@Oicraftian ?
@Oicraftian's logic: Wonders why calling someone's plane inferior and touting improvement on it annoys them. Asks, annoyed, how someone's successor is at all like their original.
Wait. How does this in any way at all resemble my original?
@AlphaOneIndustries That happens to me somtimes.
@JMicah4 I have absolutely no idea what happened.
@JMicah4 really?
you uploaded this 5 times.