Sorry I commented vertical stabilizer was wrong, what I meant was horizontal stabilizer, I wanted to say that you should make elevator’s max angle smaller, I hope you understand (I’m learning English)@Mynameis190

@OPwindu ok but anyway thanks for the advice man

yes I guess @Mynameis190

@OPwindu so you mean the major problem i'ts from the vertical wing and speed right

I love this plane, with low part counts and great detail, it should get more upvotes, I think your problem can be solved simply by making the max angle of the vertical stabilizer smaller to lower the rate of turn and making it accelerate slower to make it flies more realistic.

@Mynameis190 it has a lot to do with direct input, plus a bunch of corrections with respect to flight situations. u can start learning steep by step, even after knowing the basics evey plane is different and there will be some tweaking after that i consider thats where the fun starts. but the coding makes a huge difference. honestly speaking me after learning coding had made a huge step leap forward, and made all of my unflyable planes turns out to be good lol

@GorillaGuerrilla yes but i don't really understand about the xml coding

aesthetically this plane is gorgeous.
but u really need to dig your hands into xml coding to make the flight characteristics better, especially when i checked out the hidden wings placement i think they are terrible, and probably spend too many of them trimming. seriously this build can get quite good, it looks promising for improvements. for the unexpected roll i think u probably need to make some control surface to work the opposite way. really u cant just get lazy on control surfaces and rely on direct inputs

good

So Kool