Profile image

p-95

6,836 Michiganstatepolice  1.2 years ago
18 downloads
No Tags
Auto Credit Based on Michiganstatepolice's p-95

welcome to the dangerzo- oh sorry, this aircraft was deployed in 1946 as a air superiority fighter but got heavily outdated by 1948 the main benefit it had against piston fighters (it was slower then the f8f and f4u) was climb and altitude so it was demotted to a ground attack aircraft where it was scarily effective alongside the f4u corsair where it dove onto ground targets and shredded them, it went out of service in the 1970s as the a-10 was being developed, ultimately it lived most of its life as a ground attack aircraft, controls are labled

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor p-95
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 39.7ft (12.1m)
  • Length 39.8ft (12.1m)
  • Height 9.8ft (3.0m)
  • Empty Weight 9,510lbs (4,313kg)
  • Loaded Weight 12,034lbs (5,458kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.792
  • Wing Loading 43.8lbs/ft2 (213.8kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 274.8ft2 (25.5m2)
  • Drag Points 4416

Parts

  • Number of Parts 146
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 847
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @LieutenantSOT if allowed I'm adding 3 35 mm cannons for air to ground and the 20 mms will the a air to air

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @LieutenantSOT I'm just adding decals, maybe increaseing speed and adding more stuff to go boom

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    As it is the same build revamped, I will just omit this plane, and make that one the "true" plane. If you upload an entirely new aircraft I will give you a second score

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Planebuilder2123 I never said you couldn't... ;p
    .
    You have as many uploads as you want!!

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @LieutenantSOT am I allowed to reupload it with labels and better handling? If so I might also increase the bomb load

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @LieutenantSOT nice

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    Alrighty mate, here's the time for your grade!
    As with everyone else, these are subject to change, and I will say why I graded it what way after the score
    .
    Speed: 7/10
    Maneuver: 9/10
    Realism: 13/15
    Requirements: 25/30
    Carrier: 15/15
    Tactical: 9/10
    Looks: 3/5
    Opinion: 4/5
    Total: 85/100


    It was pretty nice in terms of speed! A wee bit slow, but hey its okay! I did deduct points because the minimum speed was 400 knots, but its okay!
    That maneuverability... my lordy it was smooth XD. The pitch fought me sometimes though, but I got it to work in the end
    Realistically, this aircraft is really good! I like the design, the thrust is realistic to the era enough, realistically the engines are still too powerful, but y'know what, I made a rule where you could, so I won't argue lol
    The requirements are all splendid, minus the underspeed
    Carrier is probably the smoothest of all the aircraft thus far lol
    Tactically it is great! The armament is powerful, and the bombs are good! But I've found them rather inadequate, actually. I did allow up to 2000 lbs per bomb, so you could have increased them, but its okay! They still worked great
    Looks-wise, of the three approved entries, I marked this 2nd place, obviously the propfan looks the most amazing, like dear god I can't even make a plane look that good, but this plane is really nice!! I just wish it had some markings on it, even text ones
    And my opinion, this plane is dope! I love it! I flew around and messed around. I originally planned on my tests being structured and stuff, but they mostly are just me blowing random things up, doing something structured, and then bombing something else. This plane took care of the USS Tiny well lol, and handled a few stop and go landings. All in all, a great contender! This is second place so far!! Thanks for your entry mate!

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @LieutenantSOT yeeeee boiiiiiiis

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    Oh and... ahem
    .

    Approved

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    Cool!! I'll check her out in a wee bit, mate!

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @lieutenantSOT Sorry I didn't make it a successor I rushed it abit

    +1 1.2 years ago