@exosuit good advice!

There are more things than trying to improve other's build.
.
If you spent the last year just by improving people's build, when are you going to improve your own?
.
Skills are obtained through training
.
You make stuff and improve upon it

@IlikeToFlyandcrash not sure if it was sarcastic about the kind approach, but the most likely answer to why it got deleted is the original creator wanted it to be removed.
.
I'm not really a fan of that either. I believe there's more about "improving" a build than just painting it in a different color and adding few parts.
.
For me, i usually confront the person and try to get their answer. When they can't give valid reasoning, i take down the post.

@exosuit but your kind approach is a wonderful thing!

I already have @exosuit and I still don’t under stand why my plane was destroyed? But I can’t do anything now so I guess I should just give up.

When a new update comes out, users can submit their creations to be part of the stock creations.
.
Jundroo basically didn't steal their creations as they're basically giving them to the devs.
.
Before going anywhere further, i suggest you read the rules again.

Which one?

I would like to see your design
@IlikeToFlyandcrash

*What not wha

@SnoWFLakE0s ok I see were you are coming from. But I also think that you have perceived my meaning. The only thing different to the plane that they copied has NOTHING DIFFERENT EXCEPT THE COCKPIT! The part count is what I have used to describe my meaning. The plane is exactly the same, except the Cockpit. So I ask you again.

“Why can’t I do what they do and not have my airplane removed?”

The simple question is, if I were to do what they do and I do do wha they do then why do I have my airplanes removed?

I will test there system and publish the same airplane as I am complaining about of what they copied. And if it is deleted then I will get... never mind. But I will test and publish the results here!

@IlikeToFlyandcrash First, some spelling... "Sight" means something drastically different from "site". As I said, I can only infer what you are trying to say if you don't use proper English conventions.
.
As an rebuttal to your nonsensical argument about how Jundroo has "copied" someone's plane and "added 2 parts"... If you have any sense of how the game works, it's pretty obvious they've change more than "adding 2 parts". Changes to a build aren't all about the part count. If you have eyes you can see that.

In addition, I've already made it pretty clear to you:

I also have no idea what you're raising an issue with. Nobody "copied" anything. Jundroo decided that a certain plane was fitting as a stock plane, so they took the basic chassis, modified it, and included it as a stock plane for all players to gain inspiration from or to play with. All of this was done with consent from the original author.

Nobody stole anything. Plus, your works of "adding 3 pieces and a different paint job" are objectively not worth cluttering the site with, to be frank with you. Not a single person has got away with simply repainting an existing build. It doesn't show any effort. If you want to know what a real "modification" looks like, check this for example. Your work shows far too little effort, especially if it isn't something original. In the example I gave you, the part count jumped some 400 parts. Your "adding of 2 parts" is just so meager and insignificant.
.
Hope this makes sense to you.

@SnoWFLakE0s I have now stated my case!

And yet again I state my case. I also like to take old planes and turn them into actual planes and then publish them. I would ask the original author but they are normally gone!

So I found a plane and tweeted it up with 5or6 changes and a different paint color. So I published it and found to my horror that it had been deleted, destroyed and taken down. So I went looking for an argument that I could use to defend my self. And I found that the author of the sight had copied someone else’s plane with 2 added parts and change the color! Now how is it different for me to do the same?

@IlikeToFlyandcrash
Mind if you use formal, understandable English? Your argument don't stand very well if you can't phrase things accurately.

I also have no idea what you're raising an issue with. Nobody "copied" anything. Jundroo decided that a certain plane was fitting as a stock plane, so they took the basic chassis, modified it, and included it as a stock plane for all players to gain inspiration from of or to play with. All of this was done with consent from the original author.

If a police were to steal something then he would be arrested. Right? Yes! And if a poker player who was the owner of the casino were to cheat then... BAD THINGS HAPPEN!

So you are agreeing with me that they are cheating and disobeying there one rules

@IlikeToFlyandcrash they can do what ever they want and there is nothing you can do about it they own the game they created the game

I can’t ask the designer because they are gone and there airplanes are good! So I re model them (sometimes a little to less) and then repost them so that the people can actually fly and modify the airplane.

Exactly @Nickr they can but I can’t why?

@IlikeToFlyandcrash exactly look what you said and your complaining about a company coping a plane

@IlikeToFlyandcrash so what they have control they can modify what they want so can everyone else

@SnoWFLakE0s some of my designs come from people who have left this sight!

@Nickr I did not copy anything more than what they did!

You modified their wasp and you are complaining about this

I think