It’s a
Vote!
.
.
.
Ok say yes or no if you want these taken off and out of the RP (Up to deegan)
1. Secondary turrets on tanks (E. G. Commander CWIS and roof mounted Turrets, 20MM and up.)
2. Long range Radar missiles for smaller countries.
3. Auto loaders for smaller countries.
4. Companies having no business [Or not much]
5. Power armor is gone until the 2070’s
Vote count
1. III
2. IIIII
3. IIII
4. II
5. IIIIII
3 votes for each and it might get banned for 5 IRL months
:
I propose point 5: Power armor is completely removed (If you haven't already)
small countries include
You-go-Slav-ya
Companies
AFMK
@ComradeBazookaBall no purchases for said company.
1: Nein
1: Ja
3: Ja
4: Clarify
5: Make it 2100, and we got a deal
@DeeganwithaBazooka
Could you please accept this..? (Top pinned)
5
@Unwanted I mean titanium dome
@AviationLoverGEEK444 you mean my missile defense systems?
@Unwanted many times
@AviationLoverGEEK444 when..?
@Unwanted you have an iron dome apparently
@Unwanted
Also btw, Yourpanese F-18s do not have the same limitations of the Foxhound and Fox (Fishland's name for their variant of the F-18) as the Yourpanese F-18 uses mostly YP tech, as opposed to Fishland's which is entirely Umbra tech
@SchmooveBrain yeah.
@Unwanted okay so yeah, is 6.5-7.5 range okay?
@SchmooveBrain mine are around 9 miles.
@Unwanted
5 miles is the intended operating range (i assume that's not too far, but whaddoiknow), their true range is unknown as Umbra's current radar systems cannot reliably feed information to missiles past 6.5 miles, which is why the AEM-6 experiment featured an onboard radar that allows the missile to track targets on its own withing 1 mile (hence ARH-ish) but it requires the radar of the plane to still be painting the target area to "see"
I'll have to test in a moment, but I'd say they're best represented by either the AIM-7C or AIM-7D
(Their range would be less but similar to the ATAM-10s ig)
They're medium range; beyond clear visible range, but the pilot still must see the plane
@SchmooveBrain yeah you’re fine but what’s their range (For example my ATAM-10 is the second best LRRM (Long range radar missile) out there.
@Unwanted
Not exactly (primarily because I didn't want you to be mad at their use) cause they have somewhat different seekers (just faster lock times, which is realistic-ish to IRL but also for the sake of gameplay)
@SchmooveBrain you’ll be fine since they are a lender copy of the ATAM-10
@Unwanted
On the Pr.AC04-N
You should've been tagged, if not I'll go tag you there
(I wrote the AEM-6 as ARH but they aren't exactly btw, I'll explain it if you'd like)
@SchmooveBrain and those are…..?
@Unwanted
Then yes, outlaw that
On the note of II though
Would Fishland/Umbra be losing the AEM-5/6 series? Both are considered medium range and aren't exactly the greatest, but losing them sets Fishland back a lot
@SchmooveBrain Remote controlled.
@Unwanted
Ohhhhh, well that also depends on the way that's made
If it's meant for a commander to control, and it has the reasonable restrictions, or its in tandem with the turret (look at the Moderna) it's okay-ish, but if it's entirely remotely controlled then yeah, that's an issue