5

@Unwanted I mean titanium dome

@AviationLoverGEEK444 you mean my missile defense systems?

@Unwanted many times

@AviationLoverGEEK444 when..?

@Unwanted you have an iron dome apparently

@Unwanted
Also btw, Yourpanese F-18s do not have the same limitations of the Foxhound and Fox (Fishland's name for their variant of the F-18) as the Yourpanese F-18 uses mostly YP tech, as opposed to Fishland's which is entirely Umbra tech

@SchmooveBrain yeah.

@Unwanted okay so yeah, is 6.5-7.5 range okay?

@SchmooveBrain mine are around 9 miles.

@Unwanted
5 miles is the intended operating range (i assume that's not too far, but whaddoiknow), their true range is unknown as Umbra's current radar systems cannot reliably feed information to missiles past 6.5 miles, which is why the AEM-6 experiment featured an onboard radar that allows the missile to track targets on its own withing 1 mile (hence ARH-ish) but it requires the radar of the plane to still be painting the target area to "see"
I'll have to test in a moment, but I'd say they're best represented by either the AIM-7C or AIM-7D
(Their range would be less but similar to the ATAM-10s ig)
They're medium range; beyond clear visible range, but the pilot still must see the plane

@SchmooveBrain yeah you’re fine but what’s their range (For example my ATAM-10 is the second best LRRM (Long range radar missile) out there.

@Unwanted
Not exactly (primarily because I didn't want you to be mad at their use) cause they have somewhat different seekers (just faster lock times, which is realistic-ish to IRL but also for the sake of gameplay)

@SchmooveBrain you’ll be fine since they are a lender copy of the ATAM-10

@Unwanted
On the Pr.AC04-N
You should've been tagged, if not I'll go tag you there
(I wrote the AEM-6 as ARH but they aren't exactly btw, I'll explain it if you'd like)

@SchmooveBrain and those are…..?

@Unwanted
Then yes, outlaw that
On the note of II though
Would Fishland/Umbra be losing the AEM-5/6 series? Both are considered medium range and aren't exactly the greatest, but losing them sets Fishland back a lot

@SchmooveBrain Remote controlled.

@Unwanted
Ohhhhh, well that also depends on the way that's made
If it's meant for a commander to control, and it has the reasonable restrictions, or its in tandem with the turret (look at the Moderna) it's okay-ish, but if it's entirely remotely controlled then yeah, that's an issue

@SchmooveBrain like a 30mm cannon on top.

Personally:
1. Yes-ish, it depends on your definition. If you mean like what's on the T90 or VT4A1, yes, but if you just mean the roof mounted MG without a commander model, no
2. Domestic yes, purchased no. But, does Fishland get to keep the AEM-5/6 series in that regard? (Which btw, is a production of Umbra, a company that is split between 3 nations)
3. No, T-90 style yes but not entirely (see Sweden in the 1940s)
4. Idk what that means
5. Yes

@AviationLoverGEEK444 who has an “iron dome”