Be mindful of load times and data plan usage when making your aircraft webpage. This old lady can't download your 69K giga reshaded screenshots with her 100 bit-per-second modem... and it's worse when those images are instructions. Fun fact, the trillion dollar indie company Gugulu (or is it Guruguru? I can't remember) considers websites to be bad if they take 4 seconds or more to load.

You can make your images smaller by compressing them. By default, most image hosting sites and social networking sites will compress the image for you. Compression matters if the site does not change your files. If the site automatically generates smaller versions of your image, it is safe to assume that it does compression for you.

The other method is to just make them smaller. It seems that aircraft descriptions have a maximum width of 640 pixels, and it's unlikely that people are going to zoom in anyway, so doesn't make much sense to embed larger images. These two methods will :Shirley: make your user experience better.

Now that I grabbed your attention, here is the main content of this forum post. Blue text links to other users' pages are so 1990. As people of the 21st Century, we must adopt newer trends in web design. I propose that we use the informal standard of 200x40 "web banner" images when linking to other users' webpages. Such images bring out the character of their target webpages and hence entice more people to click on them.

This is an example of a web banner I made by reusing old assets:

Ok yapping over, this entire post only exists because I randomly got called an old lady some time ago... and perhaps also because I saw an aircraft post that has images in the description... that take some time to load... and are instructions... that have minor spelling mistakes...