Profile image

How fuel inefficient are engines in SimplePlanes?

47.3k Graingy  1.2 years ago

As far as I know engines in SP are horribly inefficient.
The quest is, how inefficient?
How much fuel should these engines use? Just how much range are we losing compared to what we should be getting?

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    103k ReinMcDeer

    The rates are here
    The comment says gallons/sec, but I think it's more likely liters/sec, considering SP's track record of using metric for other XML values (meters, m/s)

    Pinned 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    47.3k Graingy

    @V Yeah, I discovered that on accident.
    Shame it can't be done without affecting noise/exhaust scale, or in the case of the big engine, nozzle size.

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    38.6k V

    You can change how much fuel they use by decreasing the max input and increasing engine multiplyer. Set max input to 0.5 and power multiplyer to 2 to double the fuel efficiency

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    47.3k Graingy

    @TheMouse Tell Geminus to move the sode lol
    Do not drink

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    66.3k TheMouse

    @Graingy
    Possessed soda. How would one make that?

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    47.3k Graingy

    @MrSilverWolf I see

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    47.3k Graingy

    @TheMouse Well considering he's a matter god he kinda is the fuel.
    Ever seen fuel flow up? Creepy, let me tell you.
    That or the robot guy. He's just strong.
    I've also seen possessed soda. I would not recommend drinking it.

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy engine brand found in light aircraft

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    66.3k TheMouse

    @Graingy
    Your boss is one strong man.

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    47.3k Graingy

    @TheMouse But I LIKE having to call my boss to load things!

    +2 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    66.3k TheMouse

    @Graingy
    No duh. Set the mass scale to 0!

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    47.3k Graingy

    @MrSilverWolf lycoming? I don’t follow?

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    47.3k Graingy

    @TheMouse Blackhole time

    +2 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    66.3k TheMouse

    Ok great! This gives me the perfect execute to add 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 gallons of fuel to my next plane,

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    3,368 FishbedFive

    @MrSilverWolf so you're saying the jet engines would dry up our fighters in mere seconds

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    The prop engines set to corresponding lycoming and continentals burn what they would in an hour in a minute

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    47.3k Graingy

    The biggest one seems off, though?
    Feels wrong...

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    47.3k Graingy

    @ReinMcDeer Thanks!
    I think it's linear between engines with thrust, though I'm too lazy to do math.

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.8k YarisSedan

    @ReinMcDeer damn tysm mate

    +2 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    47.3k Graingy

    @BYardley Also absurdly powerful. The "afterburning" turbofan is like twice as powerful as a similar looking engine.
    150kn dry (I don't believe afterburner is actually simulated), vs like 70 for the F-15's.

    +2 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.3k BYardley

    So true they're ridiculously fuel unefficient.

    +2 1.2 years ago