Profile image

How fuel inefficient are engines in SimplePlanes?

44.1k Graingy  one year ago

As far as I know engines in SP are horribly inefficient.
The quest is, how inefficient?
How much fuel should these engines use? Just how much range are we losing compared to what we should be getting?

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    98.6k ReinMcDeer

    The rates are here
    The comment says gallons/sec, but I think it's more likely liters/sec, considering SP's track record of using metric for other XML values (meters, m/s)

    Pinned one year ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @V Yeah, I discovered that on accident.
    Shame it can't be done without affecting noise/exhaust scale, or in the case of the big engine, nozzle size.

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    38.5k V

    You can change how much fuel they use by decreasing the max input and increasing engine multiplyer. Set max input to 0.5 and power multiplyer to 2 to double the fuel efficiency

    one year ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @TheMouse Tell Geminus to move the sode lol
    Do not drink

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    65.9k TheMouse

    @Graingy
    Possessed soda. How would one make that?

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @MrSilverWolf I see

    one year ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @TheMouse Well considering he's a matter god he kinda is the fuel.
    Ever seen fuel flow up? Creepy, let me tell you.
    That or the robot guy. He's just strong.
    I've also seen possessed soda. I would not recommend drinking it.

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy engine brand found in light aircraft

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    65.9k TheMouse

    @Graingy
    Your boss is one strong man.

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @TheMouse But I LIKE having to call my boss to load things!

    +2 one year ago
  • Profile image
    65.9k TheMouse

    @Graingy
    No duh. Set the mass scale to 0!

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @MrSilverWolf lycoming? I don’t follow?

    one year ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @TheMouse Blackhole time

    +2 one year ago
  • Profile image
    65.9k TheMouse

    Ok great! This gives me the perfect execute to add 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 gallons of fuel to my next plane,

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    3,368 FishbedFive

    @MrSilverWolf so you're saying the jet engines would dry up our fighters in mere seconds

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image

    The prop engines set to corresponding lycoming and continentals burn what they would in an hour in a minute

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    The biggest one seems off, though?
    Feels wrong...

    one year ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @ReinMcDeer Thanks!
    I think it's linear between engines with thrust, though I'm too lazy to do math.

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    30.0k YarisSedan

    @ReinMcDeer damn tysm mate

    +2 one year ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @BYardley Also absurdly powerful. The "afterburning" turbofan is like twice as powerful as a similar looking engine.
    150kn dry (I don't believe afterburner is actually simulated), vs like 70 for the F-15's.

    +2 one year ago
  • Profile image
    17.2k BYardley

    So true they're ridiculously fuel unefficient.

    +2 one year ago