@GuardianAerospace if the blueprint you're using has various cutaways to show the cross section at different parts of the plane (labelled A, B, C, ...) that helps with the curves a bunch
@GuardianAerospace Were you able to find a blueprint with cross sections? What I do is make each cross section out of hollow fuselage pieces and space them apart as the blueprints says. Then you can build the actual fuselage between the cross sections to get the right shape. With more complex curves you'll need to do some extra work in between them, of course.
BONE
T
@TalonTheCRTguy noo
@GuardianAerospace no you
self portrait
T@Tingly06822 yes
267,600 kilograms.
@GuardianAerospace if the blueprint you're using has various cutaways to show the cross section at different parts of the plane (labelled A, B, C, ...) that helps with the curves a bunch
@TalonTheCRTguy I think we had Russian in our team...
@Eggplant i have no idea what you are saying
@GuardianAerospace Were you able to find a blueprint with cross sections? What I do is make each cross section out of hollow fuselage pieces and space them apart as the blueprints says. Then you can build the actual fuselage between the cross sections to get the right shape. With more complex curves you'll need to do some extra work in between them, of course.
@LunarEclipseSP yesh
@Eggplant like with the curves and stuff
@Graingy no, the Tu160 not only looks like crap but also performs as such. Lmao
define help
The plane in your profile
@TalonTheCRTguy In a rare instance I actually agree with you.
Bigger is better, comrade.
And by better I mean more awesome.
@TalonTheCRTguy bruh stfu
@TalonTheCRTguy BY THE POWER VESTED IN THIS 454 CASULL I SENTENCE YOU TO NONEXISTENTANCE
T
B1 Lancer bad TU-160 better