I think something weird happened to the power plant, and now her max speed is about 15-18knts more than historically conceived (30knts). I’ll try to fix this, so a fixed version will be out soon (again).
This project was so massive, I got several other builds done during it (better 406mm gun turrets, Voight O2U Kingfisher, a mobile-friendly catapult, and some tanks…). Coming soon, if @EmpNapoleonBonaparte wanted to see Kim Jong Un… I shall deliver.
ARTILLERY/GUNNERY
AG1 to activate the turrets; VTOL and Trim for control
AG2 to activate the secondary guns; VTOL and Trim for control
AG3 to activate the AA Guns (MASSIVE LAG WARNING); VTOL and Trim for control
.
AVIATION
AG4 to maneuver the catapult (VTOL)
AG5 to activate and launch spotter (normal flight controls and is capable of water landing; however it is irrecoverable due to lack of working winches)
@AWESOMENESS360 uhh yeah. Also it could be a ship transport (those exist; there was a picture of a damaged Arleigh Burke-class getting carried by one).
Ah yes. Victory.
I was listening to that song last night and picturing a cinematic for this battleship with that song. (Not promising anything, but maybe ;) note: this won’t have any of the new parts; that might come in another overhaul of the ship)
@Pyrrha
Coming soon. I said I'd launch a heavy tank design after the gauges were added, so I might as well finish this first.
.
If anyone's interested about the specs (part count, drag, etc), click here.
.
NOTE
Some last minute changes might be made, so the specs may only be 94% reliable AS OF NOW.
PLEASE NOTE
This is an experimental concept, so it might never get launched on SimplePlanes. However, if you guys like, I will try to pursue rocket-related content. I'm not letting upvotes speak... I'll let the comments speak for whether or not they want some of this.
This is why I haven't pursued much of a battlecarrier ever since the original USS New York refitted concept (in fact, the USS Manhattan doesn't even have a crane or any recovery system at all for that matter). @AndrewGarrison
Where do you use that line of code?@FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFair
NOTE
I think something weird happened to the power plant, and now her max speed is about 15-18knts more than historically conceived (30knts). I’ll try to fix this, so a fixed version will be out soon (again).
Look at the newest version of the model.
“You want to see destroyer??”
@Firebird123
AUTHOR’S NOTE
This project was so massive, I got several other builds done during it (better 406mm gun turrets, Voight O2U Kingfisher, a mobile-friendly catapult, and some tanks…). Coming soon, if @EmpNapoleonBonaparte wanted to see Kim Jong Un… I shall deliver.
THE PINNED ONES
@BeastHunter
INSTRUCTIONS
ARTILLERY/GUNNERY
AG1 to activate the turrets; VTOL and Trim for control
AG2 to activate the secondary guns; VTOL and Trim for control
AG3 to activate the AA Guns (MASSIVE LAG WARNING); VTOL and Trim for control
.
AVIATION
AG4 to maneuver the catapult (VTOL)
AG5 to activate and launch spotter (normal flight controls and is capable of water landing; however it is irrecoverable due to lack of working winches)
Type T or something like that, and I’ll tag you.
@BeastHunter Ah ok. I'll try to remember that...
+1@BeastHunter Ok why does everyone keep saying T?
Ah. I see you are a mobile-friendly man as well (or woman; I tried to preserve the meme here as much as possible).
+1This is my attempt at a Vought O2U Kingfisher for the USS Montana inbound (runway for scale as to how massive this thing will be).
B I T C H YOU WANNA SEE SOME REAL SPEED I'LL SHOW YOU SOME REAL SPEEEEEEEEED
+3.
earrape
QUICK NOTE EVERYONE
I gave it a small overhaul from what you see in the picture. The new updated model has more AA guns, less drag points, and more lag lol.
S P G T I M E
+1I made a custom six-engined 40-bomb bomber. Think you could take a look and give me some tweaks please? (note: I know the color's screwy...)
You gotta de-drag a lot of those parts for that to be runnable... all things inevitably have a cost.
+1@AWESOMENESS360 uhh yeah. Also it could be a ship transport (those exist; there was a picture of a damaged Arleigh Burke-class getting carried by one).
“LES GO FIND DA GORLSZ”
“Banana”
That’s actually a very good design. U-shaped boats (twin hull, which increases stability).
...and then I'm making bigger lol.
Should I begin redeveloping the airborne battleships or is the Montana good enough?
Ah yes. Victory.
+1I was listening to that song last night and picturing a cinematic for this battleship with that song. (Not promising anything, but maybe ;) note: this won’t have any of the new parts; that might come in another overhaul of the ship)
@Pyrrha
thomas the tank engine intensifies
+2Coming soon. I said I'd launch a heavy tank design after the gauges were added, so I might as well finish this first.
.
If anyone's interested about the specs (part count, drag, etc), click here.
.
NOTE
Some last minute changes might be made, so the specs may only be 94% reliable AS OF NOW.
@EmpNapoleonBonaparte On second thought, if you want, I MIGHT have a ballistic missile design in the works... after something else massive.
+1The design of this is pretty nice.
The drag parts... less so lol.
@EmpNapoleonBonaparte Lol no. It's the American Sea Dragon rocket from the TV series "For All Mankind"...
+1...hence the name of the post.
@asteroidbook345 ...wait so the app that's on my iPad is a ghost app?
This reminds me of the T110E4...
PLEASE NOTE
This is an experimental concept, so it might never get launched on SimplePlanes. However, if you guys like, I will try to pursue rocket-related content. I'm not letting upvotes speak... I'll let the comments speak for whether or not they want some of this.
This game was and still is a part of my life. The only classic Rovio has left untouched (for some reason... though I praise this survival).
+1@Kangy THIS THING SHOULD BE PREMIUM
+1K A Y A K T I M E
This is why I haven't pursued much of a battlecarrier ever since the original USS New York refitted concept (in fact, the USS Manhattan doesn't even have a crane or any recovery system at all for that matter). @AndrewGarrison
+1I built a tank, and am now waiting for the gauges to come out so it'd look better.
.
Good luck on getting the gauges in, supermarine.
H A H A M E M E G U N
MMM Mobile friendly
Mmmm numbers.
This is the first heavy tank I've ever constructed in it's fullest, but it isn't the first tank I've ever constructed.
.
COMING OUT after the gauge part is added.
Is this also gonna be with mobile/PC?
UPDATE
So I decided to leave the R179 project for later on. For now, I'ma get into something besides warships that's armored...
LET'S GOOOOOOOOOOOO
+1Hmm...
+1The detail in this is astounding.
The goddamn drag and part count, less so lol.
.
This is why I build my models the way they are.
The preview of the top view, right-side view, and front view kinda ruin it lol.
@Erc90F4RU I don't use mods, partly because I can't use mods.
I use iPad.
@Erc90F4RU I decided to remove it from the official model because it just didn't feel right...
World of Tanks flashbacks
B L O M P
@FeiWu Thanks.