seriously, why are you so interested in GOF2.....wait, you don't need to answer that but seriously that frigate has only one turrent and 3 secondary weapon..
The easiest way is to decrease the number in your main ejector so you have more thrust at the front or you can add more blasto vtols engines . I wil help you as I can.
@jared3339 well maybe I we can still be friends after this. Please take my word for it that I didn't mean that your planes are trash. I really think tat your planes are quite good and some of them I have seen on the homepage they are all caliberated carefully and I know the time you put in these stuffs . I generally build fictional planes and can claim credits for all MIR aircrafts on this site. perhaps you are angry at me 'cause I did not up you cause I just had this account yesterday and I didn't know I can up somebody until my friend told me yesterday. my other planes are mostly scattered.
@jared3339 I didn't mean that IMHO I was only trying to help and a wing with fuselage stuck in it could really bring out the old thick wing aircraft's style and don't need to be that rude . I may not build as good as you but I do have the right to try to help you.
Wow what a really excellent xml work! The closest i had seen was the Droplet. i did xmls from time to time and cannot imagine how it will be like with a tiny anzoid screen.…although realistic enough, i remembered that This plane has a distinct air intake under the fuselage which is a bit nearer to the rear and it had a small vertical fin under fuselage (and a rear gear if i am not much mistaken) and is the texture bug on the wing purposely done?
Wow you'd better have some strong coffee ready. ps: most interesting way of raising money I had ever seen.
seriously, why are you so interested in GOF2.....wait, you don't need to answer that but seriously that frigate has only one turrent and 3 secondary weapon..
The easiest way is to decrease the number in your main ejector so you have more thrust at the front or you can add more blasto vtols engines . I wil help you as I can.
cannot not upvote this one....simply awesome.
@jared3339 well maybe I we can still be friends after this. Please take my word for it that I didn't mean that your planes are trash. I really think tat your planes are quite good and some of them I have seen on the homepage they are all caliberated carefully and I know the time you put in these stuffs . I generally build fictional planes and can claim credits for all MIR aircrafts on this site. perhaps you are angry at me 'cause I did not up you cause I just had this account yesterday and I didn't know I can up somebody until my friend told me yesterday. my other planes are mostly scattered.
@TheLatentImage ops I was thinking about a Japanese ww2 plane and I am really sorry I wasted your time.. thanks for correcting me though.
@jared3339 I didn't mean that IMHO I was only trying to help and a wing with fuselage stuck in it could really bring out the old thick wing aircraft's style and don't need to be that rude . I may not build as good as you but I do have the right to try to help you.
@goboygo1 thanks.
Wow what a really excellent xml work! The closest i had seen was the Droplet. i did xmls from time to time and cannot imagine how it will be like with a tiny anzoid screen.…although realistic enough, i remembered that This plane has a distinct air intake under the fuselage which is a bit nearer to the rear and it had a small vertical fin under fuselage (and a rear gear if i am not much mistaken) and is the texture bug on the wing purposely done?
Fairly good replica. What about changing the propeller shape and a smoother wing?