@LoafOfBread come on I know points don't tell everuthing but you're one of the biggest account out there, it's not like you couldn't learn a little and easy thing like making an interior cockpit.
@rexzion lol, perfect. rexzion kind of said why it isn't perfect, also glass would have been nice (you said it's harder but I guess it's more about being lazy). The build isn't that bad, it's actually pretty good. But in my opinion it isn't really finished, it's a meh. Bruh and true cockpit interior, big sad for a 1000 parts plane.
@Truckdude8888 and ? what can I do about it ? I wont just post a spiral nose cone, so you either make one yourself or you download the low part version of the plane (because if you would have put your eyes a little bit more in the descirption and the comments you would have find a low part version) and take it, with credit of course.
This forum is stupid ngl, just follow the rules and don't look at what others do, they will get punished later. The rules aren't actually vague, well actually they are vague if you want to flirt with them, otherways ther's absolutely no reason to have problem if you stay clean.
@CoolPeach if the parts are usefully used, there's no problem for me. But for exemple making a really tiny thing that you only see rarely on your buind with a lot of parts for nothing isn't good.
@FinnZachary once again please stop saying that something sounds rude if it doesn't. I get your point of view, I really do. Even I said that some very high part count build are awesome (I took the zero for exemple). I have sole trouble with english so maybe you took my message wrong and I apologize. I'll say it again but of course people can share and do whatever they want, as you say, it's a sandbox game and it would be boring if everybody had to follow some rules that only a few players have in mind (Like the importance of part efficiency for me). What I wanted to say is that when you share a build to others, it's also nice to think of all the people without a beast pc (ps I do have a good pc, so I really say it for others) or those who want to play with AI or even make videos which really is FPS consuming. I was more talking about those builds who doesn't look like they have so much parts, because yes, it's a flaw. All this is only my opinion of course, for me you can do whatever you want and do it as you please, but I will not see you as a good player if you don't know how to save parts.
@tsampoy 1000* not 100. I'm not saying that a plane without a cockpit interior is a shame, I'm saying that a plane with more than 1000 parts but no cockpit interiors is a shame.
@MOPCKOEDNISHE some people still make very good planes with good flight characteristics. Most of the players that make unrealistic flight models are kids or people who played too much at Ace Combat or World of War Planes.
@MIAW26PERSIAN You tested the plane, you made it, how can't you notice the autoroll ? Even if you can't use blueprints, you can still look at pictures of the plane, I'm pretty sure you did but honestly I couldn't recognize the plane without the title. Well at least you know that your planes flys bad, but now you'll have to make them fly good. And for the canards you could have just checked on google, in two minutes you have an answer. I'm not saying that you're bad, you're actually pretty good, even if the plane does not really look like hte original one, you made a good looking plane with less than 200 parts. (I'm not trying to be rude, I just want to help with my stupid english and poor vocabulary :) )
@MIAW26PERSIAN yoyoyo I didn't say that it doesn't deserve an upvote, I just said that asking for upvotes isn't really a thing you can do...meh. Don't twist my words.
@pianobird rules : "Don't beg other users to upvote your stuff." So please don't ever ask again for upvotes (otherways mods will be aware of it), even more if you don't say please.
@DripYeager yush I know this man, but from what ?
@DripYeager I don't :(
@DripYeager who are you ? And was I supoosed to be dead ?
@WarHawk95 it's actually more or less the same
@Fox00One just saying that for a 15k player, you could start putting more work into your builds
15k ?
I wanna see a delta, like a Mirage, Rafale or a F 106
@LoafOfBread come on I know points don't tell everuthing but you're one of the biggest account out there, it's not like you couldn't learn a little and easy thing like making an interior cockpit.
@rexzion lol, perfect. rexzion kind of said why it isn't perfect, also glass would have been nice (you said it's harder but I guess it's more about being lazy). The build isn't that bad, it's actually pretty good. But in my opinion it isn't really finished, it's a meh. Bruh and true cockpit interior, big sad for a 1000 parts plane.
@gamepro9000 I'm sick of guys like you that doesn't read the description.....
@Truckdude8888 just look better next time and I wouldn't have get mad.
@Truckdude8888 and ? what can I do about it ? I wont just post a spiral nose cone, so you either make one yourself or you download the low part version of the plane (because if you would have put your eyes a little bit more in the descirption and the comments you would have find a low part version) and take it, with credit of course.
@Truckdude8888 yeah that one
@Truckdude8888 man just go on my page, it's my latest build
@JeffChandler can't wait to see it
@WarHawk95 nique@asteroidbook345 argh, Mirage IV is ugly, make a 4000 instead ;))
@WarHawk95 nique
@russianspy because I told you
pretty nice Ta
@Astro12 I didn't request a tag
@Astro12 oh well, it's still a new friend for mine :)
noice a Mig 25. A friend for my Mig 31 :)
looks a lot like my last teaser lol
Mirage III ?
This forum is stupid ngl, just follow the rules and don't look at what others do, they will get punished later. The rules aren't actually vague, well actually they are vague if you want to flirt with them, otherways ther's absolutely no reason to have problem if you stay clean.
@KnightOfRen bruh this one is sh*t, it flys like a brick if I remember right :((
@KnightOfRen ohwww
@KnightOfRen well it's 2000 parts not 3000 and the build kind of deserve them
T
@CoolPeach if the parts are usefully used, there's no problem for me. But for exemple making a really tiny thing that you only see rarely on your buind with a lot of parts for nothing isn't good.
@FinnZachary once again please stop saying that something sounds rude if it doesn't. I get your point of view, I really do. Even I said that some very high part count build are awesome (I took the zero for exemple). I have sole trouble with english so maybe you took my message wrong and I apologize. I'll say it again but of course people can share and do whatever they want, as you say, it's a sandbox game and it would be boring if everybody had to follow some rules that only a few players have in mind (Like the importance of part efficiency for me). What I wanted to say is that when you share a build to others, it's also nice to think of all the people without a beast pc (ps I do have a good pc, so I really say it for others) or those who want to play with AI or even make videos which really is FPS consuming. I was more talking about those builds who doesn't look like they have so much parts, because yes, it's a flaw. All this is only my opinion of course, for me you can do whatever you want and do it as you please, but I will not see you as a good player if you don't know how to save parts.
@exosuit of course, a low part count build isn't always a good build. So guys don't be cocky because you make low parts builds.
@YourWife well tell me what takes soooo many parts uh
@Rawhide you can have a detailed plane without too many parts, just check MisterT's Spitfire or my Ta 152
@YourWife and you underestimate how much parts you can save by being smart with what the game gives you.
@tsampoy 1000* not 100. I'm not saying that a plane without a cockpit interior is a shame, I'm saying that a plane with more than 1000 parts but no cockpit interiors is a shame.
@MOPCKOEDNISHE some people still make very good planes with good flight characteristics. Most of the players that make unrealistic flight models are kids or people who played too much at Ace Combat or World of War Planes.
@realSavageMan yeah true, only for replicas tho.
@JamesieMcPlanesieThe2st your builds are awesome ! Having a lot of parts isn't a bad thing when you know how parts.
damn this is so cool and only 200 parts !
@KnightOfRen well it's not only about part count, a lot of drag also is laggy
@DreadDeimos that sounds cool !
@Astro12 I'll take a look at it :) it's good that some players make very low part builds like yours
@Skykid028 read the comments...
@Simps I do know I'm not stupid, but what you do is, upvotes and ranks aren't something you can give like a present, it's not a twitch raid.
@MIAW26PERSIAN You tested the plane, you made it, how can't you notice the autoroll ? Even if you can't use blueprints, you can still look at pictures of the plane, I'm pretty sure you did but honestly I couldn't recognize the plane without the title. Well at least you know that your planes flys bad, but now you'll have to make them fly good. And for the canards you could have just checked on google, in two minutes you have an answer. I'm not saying that you're bad, you're actually pretty good, even if the plane does not really look like hte original one, you made a good looking plane with less than 200 parts. (I'm not trying to be rude, I just want to help with my stupid english and poor vocabulary :) )
@MIAW26PERSIAN yoyoyo I didn't say that it doesn't deserve an upvote, I just said that asking for upvotes isn't really a thing you can do...meh. Don't twist my words.
@pianobird rules : "Don't beg other users to upvote your stuff." So please don't ever ask again for upvotes (otherways mods will be aware of it), even more if you don't say please.
ah yes, the WWI plane with miniguns.
understandable, have a nice day game