44.7k ollielebanania Comments

  • Potez 630 4.4 years ago

    it was fun to fly

  • Mikoyan MiG 32 "Imperial Eagle" 4.5 years ago

    I like the general design of the plane, it looks like a mix between a Mig 31 and a Mig 29, with the back of an Sukoï. But still a high part count for what it is, all the parts are in the nozzles for no reason and next to that the vertical stabilazer isn't made of fuselage blocks. And how the hell do this thing have 10 control surfaces

  • Mikoyan-Gourevitch MiG-31 Foxhound 4.5 years ago

    @mLk non si tu veux tu peux faire bien plus

  • Mikoyan-Gourevitch MiG-31 Foxhound 4.5 years ago

    @mLk j'ai juste changé le max range

  • Philco AIM-9B "Sidewinder" 4.5 years ago

    @mLk17 le rapport avec moi ?

  • Phil Swift's Glass Boat 4.5 years ago

    @DripYeager yush I know this man, but from what ?@X4JB always here to kill the party

  • Phil Swift's Glass Boat 4.5 years ago

    @DripYeager yush I know this man, but from what ?

  • **OHW OHW Mirage is coming** 4.5 years ago

    @DripYeager I don't :(

  • Phil Swift's Glass Boat 4.5 years ago

    @DripYeager who are you ? And was I supoosed to be dead ?

  • Phil Swift's Glass Boat 4.5 years ago

    @WarHawk95 it's actually more or less the same

  • F-4 Ghoul HW 4.5 years ago

    @Fox00One just saying that for a 15k player, you could start putting more work into your builds

  • F-4 Ghoul HW 4.5 years ago

    15k ?

  • What plane should i make next? 4.5 years ago

    I wanna see a delta, like a Mirage, Rafale or a F 106

  • Ju-87 B-2 4.5 years ago

    @LoafOfBread come on I know points don't tell everuthing but you're one of the biggest account out there, it's not like you couldn't learn a little and easy thing like making an interior cockpit.

  • Ju-87 B-2 4.5 years ago

    @rexzion lol, perfect. rexzion kind of said why it isn't perfect, also glass would have been nice (you said it's harder but I guess it's more about being lazy). The build isn't that bad, it's actually pretty good. But in my opinion it isn't really finished, it's a meh. Bruh and true cockpit interior, big sad for a 1000 parts plane.

  • Mikoyan-Gourevitch MiG-31 Foxhound 4.6 years ago

    @gamepro9000 I'm sick of guys like you that doesn't read the description.....

  • Spiral Nose ! 4.6 years ago

    @Truckdude8888 just look better next time and I wouldn't have get mad.

  • Spiral Nose ! 4.6 years ago

    @Truckdude8888 and ? what can I do about it ? I wont just post a spiral nose cone, so you either make one yourself or you download the low part version of the plane (because if you would have put your eyes a little bit more in the descirption and the comments you would have find a low part version) and take it, with credit of course.

  • Spiral Nose ! 4.6 years ago

    @Truckdude8888 yeah that one

  • Spiral Nose ! 4.6 years ago

    @Truckdude8888 man just go on my page, it's my latest build

  • **OHW OHW Mirage is coming** 4.6 years ago

    @JeffChandler can't wait to see it

  • **OHW OHW Mirage is coming** 4.6 years ago

    @WarHawk95 nique@asteroidbook345 argh, Mirage IV is ugly, make a 4000 instead ;))

  • **OHW OHW Mirage is coming** 4.6 years ago

    @WarHawk95 nique

  • **OHW OHW Mirage is coming** 4.6 years ago

    @russianspy because I told you

  • Ta-152 H1 4.6 years ago

    pretty nice Ta

  • MiG - 31 ,,Foxhound,, 4.6 years ago

    @Astro12 I didn't request a tag

  • Need for speed : above ground [teaser] 4.6 years ago

    @Astro12 oh well, it's still a new friend for mine :)

  • Need for speed : above ground [teaser] 4.6 years ago

    noice a Mig 25. A friend for my Mig 31 :)

  • Low Quality Teaser Time! 4.6 years ago

    looks a lot like my last teaser lol

  • Mirage III but with wii music 4.6 years ago

    Mirage III ?

  • I'll probably get banned for this... 4.6 years ago

    This forum is stupid ngl, just follow the rules and don't look at what others do, they will get punished later. The rules aren't actually vague, well actually they are vague if you want to flirt with them, otherways ther's absolutely no reason to have problem if you stay clean.

  • F-5E/F Tiger II 4.6 years ago

    @KnightOfRen bruh this one is sh*t, it flys like a brick if I remember right :((

  • **what's wrong with a lot of builds.** 4.6 years ago

    @KnightOfRen ohwww

  • **what's wrong with a lot of builds.** 4.6 years ago

    @KnightOfRen well it's 2000 parts not 3000 and the build kind of deserve them

  • **what's wrong with a lot of builds.** 4.6 years ago

    @CoolPeach if the parts are usefully used, there's no problem for me. But for exemple making a really tiny thing that you only see rarely on your buind with a lot of parts for nothing isn't good.

  • **what's wrong with a lot of builds.** 4.6 years ago

    @FinnZachary once again please stop saying that something sounds rude if it doesn't. I get your point of view, I really do. Even I said that some very high part count build are awesome (I took the zero for exemple). I have sole trouble with english so maybe you took my message wrong and I apologize. I'll say it again but of course people can share and do whatever they want, as you say, it's a sandbox game and it would be boring if everybody had to follow some rules that only a few players have in mind (Like the importance of part efficiency for me). What I wanted to say is that when you share a build to others, it's also nice to think of all the people without a beast pc (ps I do have a good pc, so I really say it for others) or those who want to play with AI or even make videos which really is FPS consuming. I was more talking about those builds who doesn't look like they have so much parts, because yes, it's a flaw. All this is only my opinion of course, for me you can do whatever you want and do it as you please, but I will not see you as a good player if you don't know how to save parts.

  • **what's wrong with a lot of builds.** 4.6 years ago

    @exosuit of course, a low part count build isn't always a good build. So guys don't be cocky because you make low parts builds.

  • **what's wrong with a lot of builds.** 4.6 years ago

    @YourWife well tell me what takes soooo many parts uh

  • **what's wrong with a lot of builds.** 4.6 years ago

    @Rawhide you can have a detailed plane without too many parts, just check MisterT's Spitfire or my Ta 152

  • **what's wrong with a lot of builds.** 4.6 years ago

    @YourWife and you underestimate how much parts you can save by being smart with what the game gives you.

  • **what's wrong with a lot of builds.** 4.6 years ago

    @tsampoy 1000* not 100. I'm not saying that a plane without a cockpit interior is a shame, I'm saying that a plane with more than 1000 parts but no cockpit interiors is a shame.

  • **what's wrong with a lot of builds.** 4.6 years ago

    @MOPCKOEDNISHE some people still make very good planes with good flight characteristics. Most of the players that make unrealistic flight models are kids or people who played too much at Ace Combat or World of War Planes.

  • **what's wrong with a lot of builds.** 4.6 years ago

    @realSavageMan yeah true, only for replicas tho.

  • **what's wrong with a lot of builds.** 4.6 years ago

    @JamesieMcPlanesieThe2st your builds are awesome ! Having a lot of parts isn't a bad thing when you know how parts.

  • Sikorsky CH-54 Tarhe (S-64 Army Livery) 4.6 years ago

    damn this is so cool and only 200 parts !

  • **what's wrong with a lot of builds.** 4.6 years ago

    @KnightOfRen well it's not only about part count, a lot of drag also is laggy

  • **what's wrong with a lot of builds.** 4.6 years ago

    @DreadDeimos that sounds cool !

  • **what's wrong with a lot of builds.** 4.6 years ago

    @Astro12 I'll take a look at it :) it's good that some players make very low part builds like yours

  • Spiral Nose ! 4.6 years ago

    @Skykid028 read the comments...