@edensk damn you're pretty good too for making high part-count builds ;) just kidding I agree with you, Qingqiu listen, having almost 3000 parts is already way to much, but so many parts on a build that doesn't look like having so much and doesn't have the right shape sometimes is even worse. Also the flight model is...weird ? not funny to fly ? boring ? The panneling is lame and that weird concave part is ugly, you could have used concave parts instead, the back of the wings are squarish. For me, this build is n't good, it's a "meh". (and I'm not happy because your thumbnail made me click and now I'm disappointed)
@LoafOfBread that last sentence was stupid, I never said that I don't like your builds, or that I want to use them. I'm just here to say what's wrong, instead of saying "wow perfection" like all the other guys wh aren't here to help. Have a good day, didn't knew you were like this...chao
@LoafOfBread come on I know points don't tell everuthing but you're one of the biggest account out there, it's not like you couldn't learn a little and easy thing like making an interior cockpit.
@rexzion lol, perfect. rexzion kind of said why it isn't perfect, also glass would have been nice (you said it's harder but I guess it's more about being lazy). The build isn't that bad, it's actually pretty good. But in my opinion it isn't really finished, it's a meh. Bruh and true cockpit interior, big sad for a 1000 parts plane.
@Truckdude8888 and ? what can I do about it ? I wont just post a spiral nose cone, so you either make one yourself or you download the low part version of the plane (because if you would have put your eyes a little bit more in the descirption and the comments you would have find a low part version) and take it, with credit of course.
damn this is awesome, my Ta is scrap metal next to this. Way too much parts in my opinion, I'll use it only once in my SP life time but it was very nice to fly in this cockpit.
This forum is stupid ngl, just follow the rules and don't look at what others do, they will get punished later. The rules aren't actually vague, well actually they are vague if you want to flirt with them, otherways ther's absolutely no reason to have problem if you stay clean.
@CoolPeach if the parts are usefully used, there's no problem for me. But for exemple making a really tiny thing that you only see rarely on your buind with a lot of parts for nothing isn't good.
@FinnZachary once again please stop saying that something sounds rude if it doesn't. I get your point of view, I really do. Even I said that some very high part count build are awesome (I took the zero for exemple). I have sole trouble with english so maybe you took my message wrong and I apologize. I'll say it again but of course people can share and do whatever they want, as you say, it's a sandbox game and it would be boring if everybody had to follow some rules that only a few players have in mind (Like the importance of part efficiency for me). What I wanted to say is that when you share a build to others, it's also nice to think of all the people without a beast pc (ps I do have a good pc, so I really say it for others) or those who want to play with AI or even make videos which really is FPS consuming. I was more talking about those builds who doesn't look like they have so much parts, because yes, it's a flaw. All this is only my opinion of course, for me you can do whatever you want and do it as you please, but I will not see you as a good player if you don't know how to save parts.
@MrSilverWolf it odesn't sound rude at all, it's your point of view and I respect it even if I do not agree. You can make a 1 miilion part build, that's not the problem, but a million part build will not be a good build for me, a good player does not only make good looking planes with good flight characteristics, he also know how to save as much parts as he can. You can build what you want the way you want, sure, but when you share something so people can use it you have to make sure that people will be able to use it, otherways just post screenshots of the build.
@tsampoy 1000* not 100. I'm not saying that a plane without a cockpit interior is a shame, I'm saying that a plane with more than 1000 parts but no cockpit interiors is a shame.
@MOPCKOEDNISHE some people still make very good planes with good flight characteristics. Most of the players that make unrealistic flight models are kids or people who played too much at Ace Combat or World of War Planes.
@DripYeager who are you ? And was I supoosed to be dead ?
@WarHawk95 it's actually more or less the same
@Fox00One just saying that for a 15k player, you could start putting more work into your builds
15k ?
I wanna see a delta, like a Mirage, Rafale or a F 106
@edensk damn you're pretty good too for making high part-count builds ;) just kidding I agree with you, Qingqiu listen, having almost 3000 parts is already way to much, but so many parts on a build that doesn't look like having so much and doesn't have the right shape sometimes is even worse. Also the flight model is...weird ? not funny to fly ? boring ? The panneling is lame and that weird concave part is ugly, you could have used concave parts instead, the back of the wings are squarish. For me, this build is n't good, it's a "meh". (and I'm not happy because your thumbnail made me click and now I'm disappointed)
+3@LoafOfBread that last sentence was stupid, I never said that I don't like your builds, or that I want to use them. I'm just here to say what's wrong, instead of saying "wow perfection" like all the other guys wh aren't here to help. Have a good day, didn't knew you were like this...chao
+2@LoafOfBread come on I know points don't tell everuthing but you're one of the biggest account out there, it's not like you couldn't learn a little and easy thing like making an interior cockpit.
@rexzion lol, perfect. rexzion kind of said why it isn't perfect, also glass would have been nice (you said it's harder but I guess it's more about being lazy). The build isn't that bad, it's actually pretty good. But in my opinion it isn't really finished, it's a meh. Bruh and true cockpit interior, big sad for a 1000 parts plane.
@gamepro9000 it's ok
+1@gamepro9000 I'm sick of guys like you that doesn't read the description.....
@Truckdude8888 just look better next time and I wouldn't have get mad.
@Truckdude8888 and ? what can I do about it ? I wont just post a spiral nose cone, so you either make one yourself or you download the low part version of the plane (because if you would have put your eyes a little bit more in the descirption and the comments you would have find a low part version) and take it, with credit of course.
@Truckdude8888 yeah that one
@Truckdude8888 man just go on my page, it's my latest build
@JeffChandler can't wait to see it
@WarHawk95 nique@asteroidbook345 argh, Mirage IV is ugly, make a 4000 instead ;))
@WarHawk95 nique
@russianspy because I told you
@TFK001 popular ? Poor man you really think that 10 upvotes on a stupid joke make it popular. Even if it is the only post for "other".
+1all those upvoting this build won't be able to win
+3pretty nice Ta
@Astro12 I didn't request a tag
@Astro12 oh well, it's still a new friend for mine :)
noice a Mig 25. A friend for my Mig 31 :)
looks a lot like my last teaser lol
Mirage III ?
damn this is awesome, my Ta is scrap metal next to this. Way too much parts in my opinion, I'll use it only once in my SP life time but it was very nice to fly in this cockpit.
+2This forum is stupid ngl, just follow the rules and don't look at what others do, they will get punished later. The rules aren't actually vague, well actually they are vague if you want to flirt with them, otherways ther's absolutely no reason to have problem if you stay clean.
@KnightOfRen bruh this one is sh*t, it flys like a brick if I remember right :((
@KnightOfRen ohwww
it's because you can't scale only one number in the exaust scale, if you put something at 0.3 everything have to be at 0.3
+1@KnightOfRen well it's 2000 parts not 3000 and the build kind of deserve them
T
@CoolPeach if the parts are usefully used, there's no problem for me. But for exemple making a really tiny thing that you only see rarely on your buind with a lot of parts for nothing isn't good.
@FinnZachary once again please stop saying that something sounds rude if it doesn't. I get your point of view, I really do. Even I said that some very high part count build are awesome (I took the zero for exemple). I have sole trouble with english so maybe you took my message wrong and I apologize. I'll say it again but of course people can share and do whatever they want, as you say, it's a sandbox game and it would be boring if everybody had to follow some rules that only a few players have in mind (Like the importance of part efficiency for me). What I wanted to say is that when you share a build to others, it's also nice to think of all the people without a beast pc (ps I do have a good pc, so I really say it for others) or those who want to play with AI or even make videos which really is FPS consuming. I was more talking about those builds who doesn't look like they have so much parts, because yes, it's a flaw. All this is only my opinion of course, for me you can do whatever you want and do it as you please, but I will not see you as a good player if you don't know how to save parts.
@exosuit of course, a low part count build isn't always a good build. So guys don't be cocky because you make low parts builds.
@SodiumIodide well your Zero is more like a piece of art, I would never fly it again but it's a true master piece
+1@YourWife well tell me what takes soooo many parts uh
@Rawhide you can have a detailed plane without too many parts, just check MisterT's Spitfire or my Ta 152
@YourWife and you underestimate how much parts you can save by being smart with what the game gives you.
@MrSilverWolf it odesn't sound rude at all, it's your point of view and I respect it even if I do not agree. You can make a 1 miilion part build, that's not the problem, but a million part build will not be a good build for me, a good player does not only make good looking planes with good flight characteristics, he also know how to save as much parts as he can. You can build what you want the way you want, sure, but when you share something so people can use it you have to make sure that people will be able to use it, otherways just post screenshots of the build.
+2@tsampoy 1000* not 100. I'm not saying that a plane without a cockpit interior is a shame, I'm saying that a plane with more than 1000 parts but no cockpit interiors is a shame.
@MOPCKOEDNISHE some people still make very good planes with good flight characteristics. Most of the players that make unrealistic flight models are kids or people who played too much at Ace Combat or World of War Planes.
@realSavageMan yeah true, only for replicas tho.
@JamesieMcPlanesieThe2st your builds are awesome ! Having a lot of parts isn't a bad thing when you know how parts.
damn this is so cool and only 200 parts !
@KnightOfRen well it's not only about part count, a lot of drag also is laggy
@TheMegaMauster true, imagine with just 300 parts addition it would be amazing
+2@DreadDeimos that sounds cool !