The weird thing with me is that my growth accelerated exponentially over two periods @clayman0 first, after I made an anti-Jelly forum post two months ago, and second, after I hosted a huge dogfight tournament one month ago.
lol @clayman0 you've gotten farther than I had after a month ;) but yeah, great points, man. People should upvote based on the airplane, not on the popularity
You should! @TheOwlAce they're very fun to use, and make the plane look a lot more refined. They can be a bit tricky to master, but once you get the hang of it, they'll become as easy to make as every other part of the plane
Thank you! @Forwind I don't usually add art to my airplanes, but I felt like this one was missing something, so I added a couple bands. I'll be sure to follow you, as well :)
It is not designed for high-speed fighting @CoconutBear2k16 it's a bomber. It has adequate agility so it can engage enemy fighters, but only on the defensive.
I just tried it out and I love it! I apologize that I didn't see it sooner, my username has no vowels in it, so that extra "i" in your tag didn't let it work ;) but I really like this airplane! It makes me so happy that other people are trying out this technique after seeing my planes! :)
Of course I do @TheOwlAce arguably every hard-working user on this site has a feature-worthy build somewhere. But it's all about which ones get noticed. And for some reason, my content was noticed, and yours wasn't. I'm not saying either of our builds is better than the other, all I'm saying is that publicity and popularity are everything on this site, no matter how sad and unfair it may be.
I need you to calm down before you get into trouble, mate @TheOwlAce I don't know why your carrier didn't get as much attention as it deserved, and it's not my fault that your aircraft didn't get as many downloads or upvotes as mine did. I'm just building what I build, I'm not targeting anyone. And by the way, I didn't even know my bomber got featured, that's awesome news for me. I'm not pretending to have the best planes on this site, I'm just another user. I feel like luck and early friendships with other users are huge factors in how fast you grow, and also how often you post, and how consistent your posts are.
If I could offer some advice, it would be to add the function of the build you post right next to its name @TheOwlAce I looked at some of your stuff, and a lot of it is titled with assorted numbers and letters, which I know is probably your name system, which is great and I love it. But people don't really know what they're getting into when they see an airplane with just that name. Adding what kind of plane it is, like "Fighter" or "Bomber" or whatever so users can read what it is before even opening the page would provide more guidance and draw more downloaders in, which would draw more followers in, and maybe get you some more upvotes :)
Thanks! @Tazziedevil03
Get well soon, my friend :)
Thank you! @Upquark
Lol @Scottydoesthings
Not the I-16 particularly @Scottydoesthings but it's based off of the early monoplane fighters from that era
Thank you so much! :D @TempestAviation
Thank you! @OldColonel @grizzlitn
Thank you all for the upvotes! @CarlosDanger13 @PINK @SimplePlanesRUSH @Sutairs
Thanks a lot! :) @General360
Yeah it kinda does lol @ACMECo1940
Thanks :) @ACMECo1940
Thank you!! @GrimMantis
Looks a bit like Sputnik
So it's not impossible @clayman0 but I was very lucky to have gotten to where I am now
The weird thing with me is that my growth accelerated exponentially over two periods @clayman0 first, after I made an anti-Jelly forum post two months ago, and second, after I hosted a huge dogfight tournament one month ago.
It looks great! @TheOwlAce you should give it another shot
@Upquark Anytime
Amazing, dude :)
Thank you! :) @HKAerodynamics
Congratulations, mate
Thanks a lot! :) @TempestAviation @Tully2001 @LouisEP
Thank you! @LouisEP
;)
lol @clayman0 you've gotten farther than I had after a month ;) but yeah, great points, man. People should upvote based on the airplane, not on the popularity
You should! @TheOwlAce they're very fun to use, and make the plane look a lot more refined. They can be a bit tricky to master, but once you get the hang of it, they'll become as easy to make as every other part of the plane
Thank you guys for the your generous upvotes! @SarcasticCommander @Sutairs @TheOwlAce
Thank you! @Forwind I don't usually add art to my airplanes, but I felt like this one was missing something, so I added a couple bands. I'll be sure to follow you, as well :)
Thanks a lot for the upvotes! @CarlosDanger13 @SimplePlanesRUSH @MrSilverWolf @BaconAircrafts @General360 @GrimMantis @Upquark
It is not designed for high-speed fighting @CoconutBear2k16 it's a bomber. It has adequate agility so it can engage enemy fighters, but only on the defensive.
Thank you @JacobHardy64 I'll see if I can implement that into a later model. Thanks a lot for flying my plane :)
Thank you @IStoleYourMeme :)
Reported for copying.
Thank you all for your upvotes! :) @Tully2001 @OldColonel @Supermini555 @jordan4019 @Sutairs
Thank you guys for the upvotes! :) @hopotumon @Upquark @ElGatoVolador @TempestAviation
Thank you :) @Goblix
Thank you all for your upvotes! @TheOwlAce @GrimMantis @NumNumz and @TehDuck
lol @JacobHardy64
Thank you! @General360
Thank you for reporting @foxythegamer12 I don't really appreciate these "successors" people have been making to my X-Wing.
Thanks a lot! @Upquark
I just tried it out and I love it! I apologize that I didn't see it sooner, my username has no vowels in it, so that extra "i" in your tag didn't let it work ;) but I really like this airplane! It makes me so happy that other people are trying out this technique after seeing my planes! :)
This is cute!
Thank you! @LouisEP
Thanks @OldColonel :)
It's alright dude @TheOwlAce I'll follow you and be sure to keep a lookout for your content :)
Thank you! @TempestAviation
Of course I do @TheOwlAce arguably every hard-working user on this site has a feature-worthy build somewhere. But it's all about which ones get noticed. And for some reason, my content was noticed, and yours wasn't. I'm not saying either of our builds is better than the other, all I'm saying is that publicity and popularity are everything on this site, no matter how sad and unfair it may be.
I need you to calm down before you get into trouble, mate @TheOwlAce I don't know why your carrier didn't get as much attention as it deserved, and it's not my fault that your aircraft didn't get as many downloads or upvotes as mine did. I'm just building what I build, I'm not targeting anyone. And by the way, I didn't even know my bomber got featured, that's awesome news for me. I'm not pretending to have the best planes on this site, I'm just another user. I feel like luck and early friendships with other users are huge factors in how fast you grow, and also how often you post, and how consistent your posts are.
If I could offer some advice, it would be to add the function of the build you post right next to its name @TheOwlAce I looked at some of your stuff, and a lot of it is titled with assorted numbers and letters, which I know is probably your name system, which is great and I love it. But people don't really know what they're getting into when they see an airplane with just that name. Adding what kind of plane it is, like "Fighter" or "Bomber" or whatever so users can read what it is before even opening the page would provide more guidance and draw more downloaders in, which would draw more followers in, and maybe get you some more upvotes :)
I'm sorry, mate @TheOwlAce I don't really know what to say :/