@Formula350 so basically, GS is your speed relative to the ground. TAS is your speed relative to the air around you (it can be affected by wind), but isn’t adjusted for atmospheric density or altitude. IAS adjusts for altitude and density as well as wind, so it gives you a more accurate reading on whether or not you're going to stall if you’re landing at a higher altitude
@TylerThomason2 the living god himself Bogdan made multi input rotators almost immediately after the FT update was released, I used some and made my own. Usually for elevators with trim Pitch+Trim/4 is my go to
@FeatherWing it’s not from overload, there’s a little box with an x in it above the part transform tool in the designer you can use to make custom variables
@BogdanX Young man, not once did I say your math was wrong. I also never said your video was forged. I fail to understand how pointing out differing results in different atmospheric conditions is "hate", though knowing you defining "hate" as anything that goes against your supposed godlike building skill isn't out of the question. This has nothing to do with "thinking for yourself" and everything to do with the straight facts that a 15s takeoff run in a heavier plane with less wing area and full fuel load in the same atmospheric conditions as a warm, dry day is not justifiable. I don't know what is preventing you from understanding that a different mathematical outcome and facts that don't align with your opinions are just as valid as your other sources. You can't just rely on one source for everything and discount one that disagrees. I don't know what is preventing you from simply looking up the title of the video but since you're apparently incapable of utilizing a search bar here is the link.
You clearly didn't even read the post either, as I both posted the thumbnail and title of your video so people can look it up themselves and check, and I said that the time on there is just as valid, and this puts the takeoff roll time between 16.5 and 28 seconds. I didn't have to do any of this, by the way. I was trying to help you make your flight model just that much more realistic, since I know how much you value realism and accuracy in replicas. I've spent my own free time finding sources, comparing videos, fiddling with the flight model myself, and doing a lot of stuff nobody asked of me because I think everything can be better. My reworked version isn't perfect either, and I never claimed it was.
@Formula350 no, weather just changes the atmosphere and visibility. Wind settings are a different thing
@Formula350 so basically, GS is your speed relative to the ground. TAS is your speed relative to the air around you (it can be affected by wind), but isn’t adjusted for atmospheric density or altitude. IAS adjusts for altitude and density as well as wind, so it gives you a more accurate reading on whether or not you're going to stall if you’re landing at a higher altitude
@spectre118 shhhhhhh
What if I just made a borg cube
You watched the mustard video
@BomberBoy2 thanks!
@jinsatgat yeah it is I didn’t catch that
@DanDaFreakinMan You'd have to just open the cockpit and click them from outside or increase FOV
YES
@AndrewGarrison thanks for the curation! I hope everyone has fun with this in VR!
@WiiMini thanks
@Bellcat I’m not depressed, and I have a therapist, but thanks
@Tang0five yeah fair, it’s just an annoying CoM bug
@PioneerThe2nd Now it's off center in the opposite direction after mirroring?? What?
@PioneerThe2nd They're both at the same X coordinates, but my CoM is off center for some reason, I don't know why?
@PioneerThe2nd because if it is that’s actually pretty easy to fix
@PioneerThe2nd oh my god is that why it’s auto rolling
@Hedero I don't need luck
@Hedero I'm not redoing it
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA@Hedero Triangles are objectively the worst way to make a wing
Pog plane
Miata
@Default4 laughs in performance cost challenge
@Default4 Would things with their drag calculations turned off have a lower performance cost?
@Default4 Ah thank you
I imagine it's probably something that has to do with drag calculations but idk
@TylerThomason2 the living god himself Bogdan made multi input rotators almost immediately after the FT update was released, I used some and made my own. Usually for elevators with trim Pitch+Trim/4 is my go to
@HelloHelloTheUnt Yes, meteorbook345
@BogdanX Ah that's better identifying the problem and offering a solution we love to see it
@rexzion yeb
MP's been being a little weird lately
@BogdanX Wonderful constructive criticism, by the way
But hey it looks nice
@HelloHelloTheUnt yes
AGAINST THE RULES REPORTED
@Nerfaddict heheh that was the idea
@Bellcat it has the teaser tag lol
@ChrisPy yes
Flight model isn’t done or anything, I just slapped some wings on for fun/screenshots
@Default4 oh ok
@Kennneth I do I just like explaining basic math to people
@FeatherWing it’s not from overload, there’s a little box with an x in it above the part transform tool in the designer you can use to make custom variables
Jet boat for the win baby
@WiiMini what goes around comes around
@Sparky6004 Thank you
@BogdanX Young man, not once did I say your math was wrong. I also never said your video was forged. I fail to understand how pointing out differing results in different atmospheric conditions is "hate", though knowing you defining "hate" as anything that goes against your supposed godlike building skill isn't out of the question. This has nothing to do with "thinking for yourself" and everything to do with the straight facts that a 15s takeoff run in a heavier plane with less wing area and full fuel load in the same atmospheric conditions as a warm, dry day is not justifiable. I don't know what is preventing you from understanding that a different mathematical outcome and facts that don't align with your opinions are just as valid as your other sources. You can't just rely on one source for everything and discount one that disagrees. I don't know what is preventing you from simply looking up the title of the video but since you're apparently incapable of utilizing a search bar here is the link.
Video
You clearly didn't even read the post either, as I both posted the thumbnail and title of your video so people can look it up themselves and check, and I said that the time on there is just as valid, and this puts the takeoff roll time between 16.5 and 28 seconds. I didn't have to do any of this, by the way. I was trying to help you make your flight model just that much more realistic, since I know how much you value realism and accuracy in replicas. I've spent my own free time finding sources, comparing videos, fiddling with the flight model myself, and doing a lot of stuff nobody asked of me because I think everything can be better. My reworked version isn't perfect either, and I never claimed it was.
@NakAk Oh no an irrefutable argument
@rexzion sad
@rexzion Thanks poopion!