@DEADSHOT14 Sounds completely speculative and honestly this is the internet so I'm just gonna dismiss this. I don't trust information from the internet and this sounds too weird to be true
Seizures aren't predictable that's why they're dangerous. I don't really know why the doctor thinks you'll have one now. I had one and it was an isolated incident caused by an excessively high fever when I was a few months old.
He deletes every comment after a certain timespan, it's really stupid. I honestly think it's so he can avoid being blocked but can block anyone he wants, which he does frequently
For those of you who don't speak Spanish (google translate is a little weird):
Commercial aircraft challenge
I have decided to do an airliner challenge because the majority of my builds are of that type and I wanted to see other people's mobile friendly builds.
Rules:
You should build an airplane for carrying passengers or cargo. Ex: A380, ATR-72, B737
You should make the build a successor, but I will grant some exceptions.
It must have a maximum of 190 parts.
It should not have a VR capable cabin.
It should have two, three or four engines.
No weapons or countermeasures.
Deadline is May 10, unless a sufficient amount of contestants request extensions.
You can make replicas but I really like fictional builds.
You may use XML, but no mods.
Judging criteria:
Design
Livery
Flight model/landing
Simple but well done details
Prizes:
1st place: 18 upvotes and 2 spotlights
2nd place: 12 upvotes and 1 spotlight
3rd place: 6 upvotes
4th place: 3 upvotes
Participants who do not win will receive an upvote, and if there are not enough posts for me to upvote, I'm sorry.
Note:
It is possible that this post will change, but not in very important ways, so stay tuned. If you have any questions let me know.
I made a long deadline because I want people to make good builds and so I can judge them little by little so it doesn't get annoying. ;)
If you want to join, say so in the comments.
Help me so that more people join.
@UltraLight if it’s a constant speed prop (as most turbos are) the throttle just regulates the rpm as the prop pitch increases. It accelerates too fast but has too long of a takeoff run
@WaitBreadIsntAfruit No it's a turbo not a rocket it's going 0-60 in like 3.5 seconds lmao. Real planes accelerate much slower, supercars can easily outpace them in the length of a runway.
If you're talking War Thunder then China because it has a very diverse tree, lots of vehicles at the same BR to make effective lineups. 8.0 is especially overpowered with proxy fuse AA, an ATGM with 800mm of penetration, a fast wheeled vehicle with a very good gun, and two fairly strong MBTS.
Americans have 1 good tank, the Abrams, everything else is kind of meh. Bradleys are ok IFVs but aren't as mobile or versatile as BMP-2Ms, BMP-3s and BMD-4s. Russia has several MBTs, and still have the attitude that two mediocre tanks are better than one good tank. The T-14 looks like it would have the same issues as the T-72, T-80 and T-90, but it makes it their 4th major MBT line whereas the US only has the M1 line, and almost exclusively use the M1A1 and M1A2. The T-72 has tons of variants with different ERA packs, the T-80 has many variants, and the newer T-90M isn't incredibly well protected on the hull, but has what looks like good turret protection. However, the Abrams is objectively better than most Russian tanks, but would likely be outnumbered (though it seems like they can't even prepare adequately to fight a bunch of T-64Bs and some civilians with rocket launchers).
Noooo it’s not slightly asymmetrical
+5Wonderful, I’m happy for you!
@DEADSHOT14 Sounds completely speculative and honestly this is the internet so I'm just gonna dismiss this. I don't trust information from the internet and this sounds too weird to be true
+1Seizures aren't predictable that's why they're dangerous. I don't really know why the doctor thinks you'll have one now. I had one and it was an isolated incident caused by an excessively high fever when I was a few months old.
+1@EternalDarkness KV-2 go brrrrrrr (yes 1938 I know)
+1Now put it on a tank
+3Ah so it's an Iranian holiday I was trying to find out where the holiday is celebrated
+1A new era of Jihad
+8Hey I have a model of one of these
+1How did I know MrSilverWolf would see this and immediately talk about how hard it is to fuel lmao
@Captainboeing I don’t have all of them on me right now and if I did I’m not gonna list all of them
Gonna start playing War Thunder in SP
+1I was about to comment on this like "Wow that's cool" and then remembered this is me
Slava Ukraini
+2They're probably just set to heading, make sure the input is what it's supposed to be
As memed to all hell this vehicle is, this is incredibly well done
+3@Mxdecation this has been over for years
@Dragorans yes budgie time
You can't until you have 100 points but the format is
+1OMG IS THIS THE A10 FROM WARTHUNDER WTHARNUDER OMG GUYS WARTHUDNER
+1He deletes every comment after a certain timespan, it's really stupid. I honestly think it's so he can avoid being blocked but can block anyone he wants, which he does frequently
+8@Korzalerke Yeah lmao
@DARZAVIATIONOFICIAL de nada
+1For those of you who don't speak Spanish (google translate is a little weird):
Commercial aircraft challenge
I have decided to do an airliner challenge because the majority of my builds are of that type and I wanted to see other people's mobile friendly builds.
Rules:
You may use XML, but no mods.
Judging criteria:
Design
Prizes:
1st place: 18 upvotes and 2 spotlights
2nd place: 12 upvotes and 1 spotlight
3rd place: 6 upvotes
4th place: 3 upvotes
Participants who do not win will receive an upvote, and if there are not enough posts for me to upvote, I'm sorry.
Note:
It is possible that this post will change, but not in very important ways, so stay tuned. If you have any questions let me know.
I made a long deadline because I want people to make good builds and so I can judge them little by little so it doesn't get annoying. ;)
If you want to join, say so in the comments.
Help me so that more people join.
Good luck on your builds :D
+1Lol yeah they do that and if they don't have guns or missiles they'll try to ram you
@STLTitans Oh cool
+1Woah did you make that starship?
+1dOwNLoaD cHRomE oS
@Default4 I mean I can make a Ukrainian version if you want but I'm currently making a Ukrainian Mi-8 so
(I know you're joking btw)
@UltraLight if it’s a constant speed prop (as most turbos are) the throttle just regulates the rpm as the prop pitch increases. It accelerates too fast but has too long of a takeoff run
@WaitBreadIsntAfruit No it's a turbo not a rocket it's going 0-60 in like 3.5 seconds lmao. Real planes accelerate much slower, supercars can easily outpace them in the length of a runway.
Why does it accelerate so fast
+1I feel like I should let you guys know that SPFC isn't up anymore, we merged it with SBH.
+3@UltraLight lol
ok
+1no
lol
How far in the future is this because the us could be involved in Ukraine somewhat soon and it’s still technically the future
+1@Almost yes
@Almost Lmao yeah it's nice
@Almost Damn I didn't think anyone would notice that quickly
Omg waow best version my 10 year old iPod touch can run it finally someone who respects mobile users
+9If you're talking War Thunder then China because it has a very diverse tree, lots of vehicles at the same BR to make effective lineups. 8.0 is especially overpowered with proxy fuse AA, an ATGM with 800mm of penetration, a fast wheeled vehicle with a very good gun, and two fairly strong MBTS.
Americans have 1 good tank, the Abrams, everything else is kind of meh. Bradleys are ok IFVs but aren't as mobile or versatile as BMP-2Ms, BMP-3s and BMD-4s. Russia has several MBTs, and still have the attitude that two mediocre tanks are better than one good tank. The T-14 looks like it would have the same issues as the T-72, T-80 and T-90, but it makes it their 4th major MBT line whereas the US only has the M1 line, and almost exclusively use the M1A1 and M1A2. The T-72 has tons of variants with different ERA packs, the T-80 has many variants, and the newer T-90M isn't incredibly well protected on the hull, but has what looks like good turret protection. However, the Abrams is objectively better than most Russian tanks, but would likely be outnumbered (though it seems like they can't even prepare adequately to fight a bunch of T-64Bs and some civilians with rocket launchers).
+2Telling people to stop only makes them do it more
+3This is insanely cool
@WarHawk95 Lots of people say that and then they're the ones who get mad when their builds get less upvotes than usual lmao
+2@SPairforce Ah that's where I was getting 7 from
@Xx24reminder I never said it was it’s just funny. The MiG-21 kill of an F-16 also happened though
@X99STRIKER oh wait yeah 15 for builds I am skill issue
+5Ghost of Kyiv roleplay
+8