@WarHawk95 That's why FeiWu is leaving. Some of us feel like people are getting preferential treatment and as a result are getting unjustifiably banned or striked.
@Blue0Bull Rule 3, Clause 3: No sympathy posts or memorial posts. Move those discussions to the forums.
Implying that these discussions are fine in forums. This forum hasn't caused any drama yet.
@ChrisPy It may have been with a different code that doesn't compensate for the difference in cockpit and turret position. This one also doesn't depend on the cockpit being level.
@ChrisPy The tail is difficult to do because you can't have it go 360 in every direction and you have to invert the coordinates to remedy the parallax problem. Nagisa was the first person to develop a code that compensates for the difference in position, and I added the degree limiters and fixed the compensation system.
@UltraLight Mostly for the meme lmao. My actual favorite right now is the MiG-23 but it changes weekly.
@KenworthK100TriAxle It's the tail skid. I got lazy and originally I wasn't even going to add it
@SupremeDorian I know it's just annoying that some people like to take biased action based on personal feelings
@Blue0Bull Interesting that other members of the mod team didn't think so
@SupremeDorian ok
@Simps yes they do
@WaterWaterTheLiquid lol
+1@Simps They removed it
@BagelPlane Hi
just kidding! they're never asleep...
@ChrisPy The target just has to be in the firing arc of the gun
@ChrisPy Nope.
@WrongFlyer Nice, that's an obscure one
M O O N E Y M20 Bravo
@WrongFlyer XF-103?
It can be done with FT but it would be a little hard
+1@WarHawk95 That's why I'm not in that server lol
@WarHawk95 That's why FeiWu is leaving. Some of us feel like people are getting preferential treatment and as a result are getting unjustifiably banned or striked.
+3@WarHawk95 And they did.
Good bye comrade
@SemedianIndustries Lol
@Blue0Bull Rule 3, Clause 3: No sympathy posts or memorial posts. Move those discussions to the forums.
Implying that these discussions are fine in forums. This forum hasn't caused any drama yet.
@Simps that was the argument I was making on discord to Blue0Bull but he wouldn't budge
+3@JeffChandler Lmao yeah let's just wait until one of us gets rich and then we can buy Jundroo
+1@LieutenantSOT Yep 27 years
@ChrisPy It may have been with a different code that doesn't compensate for the difference in cockpit and turret position. This one also doesn't depend on the cockpit being level.
@Sovetskysoyus indeed
@JeffChandler I know
@ChrisPy No, the clamp doesn't work. It functions like a multiplier and not a limiter. As far as I know you can't make an auto-shooting cannon.
@Kangy Thanks!
+1@Chancey21 Surprisingly they are. The problem is that the bomb bay and engine nacelles are paneled vertically, and that makes a line.
@ChrisPy The tail is difficult to do because you can't have it go 360 in every direction and you have to invert the coordinates to remedy the parallax problem. Nagisa was the first person to develop a code that compensates for the difference in position, and I added the degree limiters and fixed the compensation system.
@ChrisPy Lmao
Oh, and by the way, this is the first auto-aiming tail turret ever! Bogdan's Tu-14 will be the second.
@dINE Thanks!
@BagelPlane Bruh lmao
@NakAk Thanks!
@urbanculture Thanks!
@Tsampoy @CanCanTheBucketCan
@FlyingPatriot @Ash007 @tristarsus
@Fishminer @TheMegaMauster @urbanculture
@Simps @TheLurkingVexedVortex @Sovetskysoyus
I'm really bad at paneling so idk lol
Yeah just keep updating SP
+1guten tag
@edensk Yeah I ended up omitting some windows for some reason. Looking back I don't remember why...
@Simps Fastest comment in the west
T for tag!
brrrrr
I'm going to try taking this out with my Tu-12 lol