@shipster You should increase the mass scale of the rotators to about 5, but keep the weight low enough so it doesn't fully collapse them. Mine is just really heavy and it only has 6 torsion bars to the 10-14 on tanks
I had to delete my discord account for personal reasons. Unfortunately I should probably have transferred ownership of the SPFC but there are other servers that you can still join. I deleted all of my forums except "The all new scorpius series" because I want to eliminate some of my presence online. I left that one up because I'll probably restart that series since it was pretty cool. This might be one of my final comments, so see y'all later.
Edit: I'm not "gone", I'm just taking a little activity hiatus. I'll still be making planes but I probably won't be commenting or making forums.
@RamboJutter Yes that is true. I felt like the FGRII Dragon was too round for being a supersonic interceptor like a Mirage III or F-102, the RJ F4 irl would have a crazily high wing loading and be incredibly unstable because of how short the wings are and how large the engine is, and the Pelican just looks funky, not to mention the very low center of thrust and probably high center of mass. With the cannon layout it would also be difficult to keep it from ingesting the gases from the cannons like the MiG-9 did.
@RamboJutter The jet provost is also a popular one, probably because it's a replica. People seem to be partial to them. The only thing I would say you could improve on is wings because your WWI and WWII always have big-ish gaps between the control surfaces and the rest of the wing. Also, some of your concepts are cool but implausible, which I think is why some people don't love their appearance. I think they're cool though.
@RamboJutter I think it's the contrast with the white page. Anyways, I think you should leave your comfort zone more often! I know you've made some forums about not getting a lot of upvotes and I think it's because your building style hasn't changed very much. If you go to your hottest aircraft, you'll notice that the most upvoted ones are the ones where you branched out and tried a new building style or built a replica.
@K2K T-34-85
Jk the Panzer was better in almost every way except the transmission. The Soviets just had more T-34s than the Panzers could carry in shells.
PC is good for mods and a larger screen. It's a little easier to build.
Android is bad because nobody I know has an android device capable of running more than 300 parts.
IOS is great. I can run the over 4000 part 757 on it. It's a little hard to build because it's such a small screen but it works better than my PC.
@ChiChiWerx Lol it is definitely an ugly plane. The flight model is pretty accurate and I tried to replicate the roll-pitch rate as best I could. It does have a little auto-roll though.
I feel like the wheels look like more like an F-5 than a lightning, but it's very cool
+1@CM Alright, thanks!
@leboyent I deleted the server unfortunately
@shipster You should increase the mass scale of the rotators to about 5, but keep the weight low enough so it doesn't fully collapse them. Mine is just really heavy and it only has 6 torsion bars to the 10-14 on tanks
@RobinvanRocket Yes I know. I was bad at airfoils when I made this
@cheeki Lol
@Locurapuntocom Yes, I'm actually very curious as to what you could add that would be 700 parts lol.
@Strikefighter04 Thank you for kind words comrade
Helo I back now
+2@PapaKernels I went through all of those and the connections are fine right now
@shipster Unfortunately the problem isn't vibration, the shock is just too soft
Would you be interested in attempting custom wings/control surfaces? I can help if you'd like.
Unlisted post is here if anyone wants to try to fix it.
This'll be my first military vehicle so hopefully it actually goes well!
Sorry. In retrospect it wasn't a great idea
+5@Strikefighter04
+1O7
/|
/ \
@tsampoy yupperoni
lol
I'm not actually leaving I'm just not going to be very active here.
Edit: Hello rex
@SemedianIndustries sorry bout that lol
I had to delete my discord account for personal reasons. Unfortunately I should probably have transferred ownership of the SPFC but there are other servers that you can still join. I deleted all of my forums except "The all new scorpius series" because I want to eliminate some of my presence online. I left that one up because I'll probably restart that series since it was pretty cool. This might be one of my final comments, so see y'all later.
Edit: I'm not "gone", I'm just taking a little activity hiatus. I'll still be making planes but I probably won't be commenting or making forums.
Well not necessarily.
When I make fictional stuff these days I like to keep it conventional because "if it doesn't look right, it won't fly right"
@RamboJutter Yes that is true. I felt like the FGRII Dragon was too round for being a supersonic interceptor like a Mirage III or F-102, the RJ F4 irl would have a crazily high wing loading and be incredibly unstable because of how short the wings are and how large the engine is, and the Pelican just looks funky, not to mention the very low center of thrust and probably high center of mass. With the cannon layout it would also be difficult to keep it from ingesting the gases from the cannons like the MiG-9 did.
@RamboJutter The jet provost is also a popular one, probably because it's a replica. People seem to be partial to them. The only thing I would say you could improve on is wings because your WWI and WWII always have big-ish gaps between the control surfaces and the rest of the wing. Also, some of your concepts are cool but implausible, which I think is why some people don't love their appearance. I think they're cool though.
@JoeriV Lol thanks
@jselbach Thanks!
@RamboJutter I think it's the contrast with the white page. Anyways, I think you should leave your comfort zone more often! I know you've made some forums about not getting a lot of upvotes and I think it's because your building style hasn't changed very much. If you go to your hottest aircraft, you'll notice that the most upvoted ones are the ones where you branched out and tried a new building style or built a replica.
@Homemade1 nice
@shipster I love democracy...
@TheMegaMauster No idea lol
@K2K T-34-85
Jk the Panzer was better in almost every way except the transmission. The Soviets just had more T-34s than the Panzers could carry in shells.
@DefaultSettings The M1A1 Abrams was made in 1980. World War Two was 1939-1945.
It's like my yeetus deletus but long
It can just magically generate weapons lol
@Monday I don't know. Everyone who tells me they can't run 300 part creations have androids but tbh they're probably Huaweis or something
+3Chi-Ha best tank
@DefaultSettings Bruh when do you think the abrams was made
PC is good for mods and a larger screen. It's a little easier to build.
+1Android is bad because nobody I know has an android device capable of running more than 300 parts.
IOS is great. I can run the over 4000 part 757 on it. It's a little hard to build because it's such a small screen but it works better than my PC.
T-34-85
I thought the forum limit was 3 tbh
@ChiChiWerx Lol it is definitely an ugly plane. The flight model is pretty accurate and I tried to replicate the roll-pitch rate as best I could. It does have a little auto-roll though.
This is a cool concept and I really like it!
IOS mods don't exist because of apple's user policy and the type of files supported by IOS devices.
+2yep
@jsimi655 Nah I'm not a 55 year old suburban mom
I don't because it's a totally arbitrary measure of how "good" or "popular" your build is to a bunch of internet strangers
+1@TheLurkingVexedVortex lol
Turns out when you reverse the wing layout of a J-10 it turns into an F-16 lmao
Bringing massive planes into MP lmao
OH NO YOU'RE STARTING DRAMA DELETE NOW OR ELSE GET STRIKE