Never seen a plane gain speed from doing a loop de loop? And yes it does end in tears if you stay in the loop. Nothi g to say about the way it handles - great as always.
@srduval I don't know what the difference is. Sometimes il create a plane in high settings - run it in low and it falls to pieces. If there is a definitive difference I don't know of it.
@Austinowen. So nice of you to run through my catalogue and take the time to rate. I've taken a look at yours - it seems I've long been a fan of your work without knowing it! You've got some really interesting ideas - so I've followed you. Look forward to your next!
@srduval thanks alot and thanks for looking into a fix! I will definitely carry on developing. If I make a substantial improvement I may post. All the best
Il give it 5 even though the rear stabs fall off. You could try the old trick of attaching them.to the chassis via a pylon - makes.them.a lot stronger. Or pinch and change the shape of my rear stabs on my last plane (they are XML edited structural wings with control surfaces). Love the looks
Super stable /perfectly balanced great looks. I took a look at your pitch - all you need is a few tiny tweeks if you want to try what I did:
*Take a fuel block out of the front - so the aircraft is 1 block shorter
*Make the rear stabs semi symmetric.
*extend the pitch control surface to the end of the wing
Hope I've helped. All the best
@hypnotoad in on hangouts. Meyeri@hotmail.co.UK. as for ideas - they are few and far between. The only thing I was considering was doing a plane with square leading edges like @Diaroz
Hate people asking for stars but Bob is cute so.....
@Mkenz love you to buddy
Fell apart for me - and while it was flying it seemed to be tail heavy. 4 stars for looms and nice colour scheme. All the best
Too big :-D
Lots of shiny moving parts. Nice!
Never seen a plane gain speed from doing a loop de loop? And yes it does end in tears if you stay in the loop. Nothi g to say about the way it handles - great as always.
You have to develop this further - really cool
I should 1star this for not being bigger........:-D
@srduval I don't know what the difference is. Sometimes il create a plane in high settings - run it in low and it falls to pieces. If there is a definitive difference I don't know of it.
@srduval only thing is different physics settings?
Yeah thought of @Diaroz straight away. I like it. Flies well
Chuffin marvellous
@srduval at around 650 mph - not pulling any fancy monouvres
It looks good and I love the loud paint scheme. Just a bit dull to fly - needs more pitch and less violent yaw!
@Austinowen. So nice of you to run through my catalogue and take the time to rate. I've taken a look at yours - it seems I've long been a fan of your work without knowing it! You've got some really interesting ideas - so I've followed you. Look forward to your next!
Looks amazing - so credit to both of you.
Don't have to be big to be super cool
Nice!
@srduval thanks alot and thanks for looking into a fix! I will definitely carry on developing. If I make a substantial improvement I may post. All the best
Bite the back of your hand pretty.
Il give it 5 even though the rear stabs fall off. You could try the old trick of attaching them.to the chassis via a pylon - makes.them.a lot stronger. Or pinch and change the shape of my rear stabs on my last plane (they are XML edited structural wings with control surfaces). Love the looks
COOL AS HELL. really original idea. Love the takeoff mechanism. And the colour scheme is certainly lairy enough for me. Really nice
A joy to fly
Does fall apart at speed which is a bummer but looks good and flies well up to that point!
Super stable /perfectly balanced great looks. I took a look at your pitch - all you need is a few tiny tweeks if you want to try what I did: *Take a fuel block out of the front - so the aircraft is 1 block shorter *Make the rear stabs semi symmetric. *extend the pitch control surface to the end of the wing Hope I've helped. All the best
I've just released a new plane also - would love for you / as many people as possible to take a look. Thanks
Very nice rear wing section setup
Looks and handles itself well.
@Mkenz lol il try harder next time.....
@Mkenz that's OK. So long as its bigger :-)
@Mkenz BIGGER
Stunning stunning stunning
Flies nice! I'd like to see more pitch if possible - if it had more I think I'd 5 star it. All the best
More stable for sure - V3 - BIGGER
I'm not a HELI kinda guy but the detail and work gone into this is superb.
Nice wing work
@Mkenz nice nice il look out for it
@EglinAFB no worries. I know it can be hard to get noticed being new - although your stuff is good so you shouldn't struggle
Flies well and looks good ! Really well thought out plane
@ODST627. thanks so much buddy. Glad you like - and I know you like a curly wing or 2 :-). You cooking anything up atm ?
@Mkenz go bigger for v2!
At first I thought you'd gone full retard and put prop engines on....backwards. But they're bombs - which is cool - so have 5
As a lover of lairy colour schemes this most definitely gets a 5
@hypnotoad in on hangouts. Meyeri@hotmail.co.UK. as for ideas - they are few and far between. The only thing I was considering was doing a plane with square leading edges like @Diaroz
@ZFM99 no streds at all buddy - your feedback is always appreciated whenever it comes
@zfm99 @hypnotoad did you guys work out a way to keep in contact other than in game in the end?
Literally what's left to say? Perfect everything ....as always
I like tearing down others planes and making my own versions. Learn a lot that way too
Well its original! The part count hurts my phone a little
Also your PPM (Planes Per Minute) is crazy :-D