@deaner No, i reported for a very good reason because you stole this guy's aircraft who put hard work into this unlike you
Clearly you don't appreciate people's hard work and claim them on your own
What a coward, don't deny you didn't create these builds, you just stole them without putting credit
@AVFLYER You do realize that breaks are important right? You always can't build or work for something because you will eventually be burnt out or be tired.
@SkyteamDevelopments this was from 4.6 years ago, are you dumb or what? They obiviously had limitations, and I think your too stupid to understand that.
I bet your ass you also can't make something better than this, yet you make fun of someone's work because your ego is roughly the size of an Antonov AN-225 Mirya, makes an another point of you being a dumbass, because why comment on something you don't like? Just move on already.
@Boeing777x Both have long wings then the entire plane body itself, and both has the same engine type and propeller count. Both were introduced in the 60s
"McDonnell Douglas was still convinced that a new derivative for the DC-10 was needed, as shown by the second-hand market for their Series 30 and the heavier DC-10-30ER version. Thus, in 1984 a new derivative aircraft version of the DC-10 was designated MD-11."
_
In summary, the MD-11 and the DC-10 are indeed the same, but they are not a copy, instead being derived. The md-11 was an extended base version of the DC-10.
@Boeing727200F I deleted the public ones but I am bringing back the planes as unlisted ones, instead of public to not farm updates and to respect the builder
@WritersCrusadersAirCo2 yes
+1@ChaseRacliot how did you do that? :<
+1@ChaseRacliot not sure, anyone
+1@LunarEclipseSP maybe do the obscure ones of ww2? Many vehicles in that era arnt on SP, like the m40 gun motor carriage
+1If it's really that easy why don't you build a harder plane yourself as a challenge
+1@Romania lol, bro got humbled and switched directions as a desperate attempt to save himself
+1Nice end
@Romania Yep it is, reported them and expect it to taken down.
+1Womp womp
amazing target practice
+1average aircraft designer in the 1920s
+1Can you make the short stirling?
+1@deaner No, i reported for a very good reason because you stole this guy's aircraft who put hard work into this unlike you
+1Clearly you don't appreciate people's hard work and claim them on your own
What a coward, don't deny you didn't create these builds, you just stole them without putting credit
Why the detachers?
+1It kind of feels disrespectful to add them considering people died in this crash
I can do something with this
+1I love this track design, please keep using it
+1@deaner you can't even code you white rank troll LMAO
+1@deaner you can stop embarrassing yourself lmao
+1@126 lmao I seen worse than just that
+1I saw a person with a nsfw goat furry with a D once in a pfp
@TheUltimatePlaneLover thx
+1this stalking shit is creepy ngl
+1Weapons when?
+1@AVFLYER You do realize that breaks are important right? You always can't build or work for something because you will eventually be burnt out or be tired.
+1@ToothlessgamingYT if you truly were to honor them, why make a plane like this? If is disrespectful
+1@SkyteamDevelopments this was from 4.6 years ago, are you dumb or what? They obiviously had limitations, and I think your too stupid to understand that.
I bet your ass you also can't make something better than this, yet you make fun of someone's work because your ego is roughly the size of an Antonov AN-225 Mirya, makes an another point of you being a dumbass, because why comment on something you don't like? Just move on already.
+1@Lo9483 it is realistic, early philippine a321s have no winglets
+1I love this plane
+1@Boeing777x Both have long wings then the entire plane body itself, and both has the same engine type and propeller count. Both were introduced in the 60s
+1@Boeing777x More like an ys-11 if so.
+1Congrats on getting 40k
+1those intakes look like its nostrails 😭
+1@Omoriboy very rare, he talks like almost once a year once
+1@Iceplane7965 Ahem.
"McDonnell Douglas was still convinced that a new derivative for the DC-10 was needed, as shown by the second-hand market for their Series 30 and the heavier DC-10-30ER version. Thus, in 1984 a new derivative aircraft version of the DC-10 was designated MD-11."
+1_
In summary, the MD-11 and the DC-10 are indeed the same, but they are not a copy, instead being derived. The md-11 was an extended base version of the DC-10.
Why did you reupload your planes
+1@Boeing727200F I deleted the public ones but I am bringing back the planes as unlisted ones, instead of public to not farm updates and to respect the builder
+1I would absolutely pay for this game
+1@dINE I don't think modified generally count, besides I still have the original build
+1I love this plane so much
+1@Graingy the 4,007 people rn:
+1@HanakoSan then why would you still upvote the build, it's stolen
+1TALL DINO
+1I can imagine the horrible fears of someone actually doing something to it, worse if you added the VR tag 💀
+1"Shots fired, shots fired!"
Local neighborhood gang violence
+1@UnsuspectingTraveller77 Thank you!
+1make dave committing arson
+1@Mousewithamachinegun122 ZERO TWO WAS HERE
+1@DatTrainAndCarGuy19 those are infantry
+1@Mousewithamachinegun122 wdym
+1Congratulations tho!!! although I'll never make it to that stage :(
+1U reached platanium!
+1@Mousewithamachinegun122 will do
+1@WinsWings Second. You forgot me
+1