@Escaloplatross yes. I will. I have to update this because I forget the brake flaps too. I am busy at the moment but I will note your comment- thank you
Here is my suggestion: in most cases, the back seat is a bit higher than the front- so the pilot at the back also get a clear vision. 2, wing tip usually are narrower than the wing roots. The length of this aircraft also will improve the stability issues. Overall it is a nice one
@Leehopard go for it as 50-60s technology. But I put it as Cold-War because it will better visualize for most peoples. Again, it is even hard to understand the technology development of the era, so it is even more difficult to build a fictional one that matches it era. But I am most welcome if you could do
@KingOfTypos I saw your nice work. Welcome- but ask the Mods to add you in the challenge. Sadly some time they don’t respond. The reason to be a successor is to show your entry to other who are also joining the challenge. So that making sure that i am not giving prizes (upvotes) to a random friend.
@Ded both look and performance should be reflect the cold war era plane. Let’s say, for example - your BAe Hawk with a reverse swept wing could be acceptable
Good choice, I love to see these type experimental ones. keep it up! Thanks for joining. Note this challenge has rule of part minimum number 50 to max 450
@DARZAVIATIONOFICIAL the little hook you did at the tail was a very small landing gear. I will post some photos that I took from British Airways concord. Great work by the way -
@GrizzlitnCFSP Wow that you, really appreciate
+1@Zaineman this is an interesting design. thanks
+1Very nice. Besides, I love to see such rear and forgotten aircraft. Great choice @MAPA
+1Sure. Will do buddy
+1I remember that his dream and bids flying - it was so artistic that Miyazaki drew the animation for that movie - I am a big fan of "The Winds Rises"
+1great. love to see such forgotten designs. upvoted and spotlighted!
+1awesome, ,, F27 was my childhood friend
+1@TheTomatoLover Thank you
+1nice little ones
+1wow I was away for a while and need to catch up with your builds
+1@Escaloplatross yes. I will. I have to update this because I forget the brake flaps too. I am busy at the moment but I will note your comment- thank you
+1@Bryan5 Sorry Bryan - that was auto-corrected on my keyboard
+1@MrCOPTY no
+1@Bryan5 congratulations! You are fast. Lol
+1@Bryan5 Exactly! You got 3 ups
+1@DnzimBR do the screen recording (I used iPad) , then edit it on iMovie or AdobeRush (use any editing tool). Then publish on YouTube.
+1Amazing control. Great job. @Zaineman check this out
+1Very nice. Keep it up. Thicker vertical stabilizer will make more sense
+1Here is my suggestion: in most cases, the back seat is a bit higher than the front- so the pilot at the back also get a clear vision. 2, wing tip usually are narrower than the wing roots. The length of this aircraft also will improve the stability issues. Overall it is a nice one
+1Very nice.
+1@Minichiisan Now I have included your photo. Looks cool. Thanks again my friend
+1@Minichiisan thank you so much. I will do. I am glad that you are back
+1@GUEVANAERONAUTICS go visit my friend @DARZAVIATIONOFICIAL 's videos. He made a great video about it
+1@LimeAir no no, I like it. It is nice - that’s why I have upvote you and spotlights
+1Nice try. Good luck
+1this is a great build. nice
+1well done - very nice
+1Congratulation on 40K amigo
+1@Leehopard go for it as 50-60s technology. But I put it as Cold-War because it will better visualize for most peoples. Again, it is even hard to understand the technology development of the era, so it is even more difficult to build a fictional one that matches it era. But I am most welcome if you could do
+1@KingOfTypos I saw your nice work. Welcome- but ask the Mods to add you in the challenge. Sadly some time they don’t respond. The reason to be a successor is to show your entry to other who are also joining the challenge. So that making sure that i am not giving prizes (upvotes) to a random friend.
+1Lol. You need a bigger props then. Like A400 M
+1@MrCOPTY if you want to replace with a complex cockpit, go for it. This flies very nice
+1@Hiimakeplanes lol. That is fast
+1My New Release Sikorsky-S-97
!https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/AfN82A/Sikorsky-S-97
+1@Hiimakeplanes Now posted as Sikorsky-S-97
+1@FirstLandFish83828 @GUEVANAERONAUTICS @AWACSgodess
+1@Zaineman @MrCOPTY @L3FTxR1GHT
+1@Ded both look and performance should be reflect the cold war era plane. Let’s say, for example - your BAe Hawk with a reverse swept wing could be acceptable
+1@SPAircraftOfficial thanks
+1@Hiimakeplanes no. It was an incident
+1Good choice, I love to see these type experimental ones. keep it up! Thanks for joining. Note this challenge has rule of part minimum number 50 to max 450
+1Thanks, this is faster than light - lol
+1@TheTomatoLover yes, I am adding the cockpit and testing, Which this video is part of this
+1@1VirtualRealityConversion lol
+1nice one. Congratulations on the Platinum!
+1@Hahahahaahahshs lol
+1@Gabriel747 ha ha ha ha
+1@MAPA thanks my friend
+1@DARZAVIATIONOFICIAL the little hook you did at the tail was a very small landing gear. I will post some photos that I took from British Airways concord. Great work by the way -
+1Great job my friend.
+1