ChatGPT
@BYardley I found your SOPWITH CAMEL proportions impressive, but adding two miniguns felt out of place for a WW1-era plane. Unlike modern aircraft like the A10 Thunderbolt, these planes typically had minimal armament. Plus, synchronizing miniguns to avoid damaging the propellers would be quite challenging. The F1M2 made by @Mk1Els took precedence over your design. Remember, this is just a game, and I hope everyone, including myself, can have fun and learn something from it.
Great job with your PEA staff, but I missed your nice shots with the detailed builds. Well, I am a kind of PEA type of person in reality. I can't focus on a single project for more than a week. If I can't finish within a week, it never rolls out.
hi buddy, I missed you on SP, well I understand you get less motivation. Well, I am trying to reduce my time on SP due to other staff in life. But I can't, so far. Lol
Great job with the coding. Do you have any recommendations for the XML coding? I haven't done any coding for 20 years or more, but I could pick it up if I need to. Still strong with math too. (I wish I have more extra time though)
@Stinkysock this is "how to make a challenge’’ - written by @EternalDarkness
step one: make sure you are competent. If you can't build a good entry for your own challenge, you can't rate entries on such a challenge;
step two: make a set of rules, requirements, and judging criteria. Write them down on an unlisted post, so you can just copy and paste them;
step three: make a build, 2D or 3D, that shows what the challenge is about and post it;
step four: edit the description of the challenge post to show all the rules, rewards, judging criteria...
step five: wait until the deadline you gave is up;
step six: rate entries and give rewards. It should take you two to three days, few hours a day for that.
Dear All, IF you see an incomplete build in the editor, it is a glitch. You can play directly without doing anything, Or you can turn on the visibility icon (the eye icon) if you want to see the parts in the designer mode.
Great thought and agree. Happyness was during the build and continuous testing and improvement. After that, I will post it. Not all players are builders, so those people can download and play. Thanks if people give credit and upvotes, but the main happiness was in my build.
@Monarchii I like your concept of "Part Efficient Aircraft" - well, I mostly build around 100 parts. I want to build many planes but it is too hard for me to focus only on a single plane for a long period
Sounds stupid to me at first, but ha ha ha,,, not at all. This is a cool challenge. Upvote and Spotlighted! A gyroscope is a must. Without that, it’s impossible
@Apollo018362 I see, thanks
@MrCOPTY Ha ha - it's Human 95%, GPT5%, and AI 0%
+1ChatGPT
+1@BYardley I found your SOPWITH CAMEL proportions impressive, but adding two miniguns felt out of place for a WW1-era plane. Unlike modern aircraft like the A10 Thunderbolt, these planes typically had minimal armament. Plus, synchronizing miniguns to avoid damaging the propellers would be quite challenging. The F1M2 made by @Mk1Els took precedence over your design. Remember, this is just a game, and I hope everyone, including myself, can have fun and learn something from it.
@Monarchii any way, you are the fastest Platinum in history (as far as I know) - congrats
+2Great job with your PEA staff, but I missed your nice shots with the detailed builds. Well, I am a kind of PEA type of person in reality. I can't focus on a single project for more than a week. If I can't finish within a week, it never rolls out.
+2beautiful build.
+1@AndrewGarrison Thanks so much for your support!
hi buddy, I missed you on SP, well I understand you get less motivation. Well, I am trying to reduce my time on SP due to other staff in life. But I can't, so far. Lol
this is a cool design - a modern P38
Wow, this is quite a detailed explanation. I guess the VR builds got 30 upvotes per build, maybe I am wrong. It is hard to calculate definitely.
@Apollo018362 Thanks for a lot of upvotes today.
+1@RicardoACE no problem
Great plane, and a great story from the Fockland war, 1981.
thanks for joining
+1@KSB24 Thanks
+1Great job with the coding. Do you have any recommendations for the XML coding? I haven't done any coding for 20 years or more, but I could pick it up if I need to. Still strong with math too. (I wish I have more extra time though)
+1@Stinkysock this is "how to make a challenge’’ - written by @EternalDarkness
step one: make sure you are competent. If you can't build a good entry for your own challenge, you can't rate entries on such a challenge;
step two: make a set of rules, requirements, and judging criteria. Write them down on an unlisted post, so you can just copy and paste them;
step three: make a build, 2D or 3D, that shows what the challenge is about and post it;
step four: edit the description of the challenge post to show all the rules, rewards, judging criteria...
step five: wait until the deadline you gave is up;
step six: rate entries and give rewards. It should take you two to three days, few hours a day for that.
@Noob101 ah, thanks. You are right. But I forget my Vexin-A23 when I was sketching this. LoL
+1good work
either way looks beautiful in my eyes
+1Supporting the Challenge with a SPOT! good luck my friend
Huh, this is a Russian version on the C119
Dear All, IF you see an incomplete build in the editor, it is a glitch. You can play directly without doing anything, Or you can turn on the visibility icon (the eye icon) if you want to see the parts in the designer mode.
looks very fun - as beautiful as all your works, especially lov that inverted gull wings
@TheAviator77 thanks
Great thought and agree. Happyness was during the build and continuous testing and improvement. After that, I will post it. Not all players are builders, so those people can download and play. Thanks if people give credit and upvotes, but the main happiness was in my build.
+1@Monarchii I like your concept of "Part Efficient Aircraft" - well, I mostly build around 100 parts. I want to build many planes but it is too hard for me to focus only on a single plane for a long period
+3@Monarchii thanks for your support, have fun
+1@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore thanks- this is based on a photo that i saw a few days ago. Not an exact copy though, since I built it from my memory
+1@Monarchii thanks
@Monarchii YES!!!
+1@Monarchii guess where I get the inspiration?
Try my old AI capable F16, made out of 50 parts - F16-in-50-parts
@SpeedhunterFlying wing design is not a new thing. Check out the Northrop YB-35 which flew in 1949 and develop during the WW2
+1@Hahahahaahahshs Ha ha,,, this is 1947 buddy ,, this is old
@Quercon I see
+1@Quercon I guess you might need some weight as well. Check this out: Kammov K8 which is similar size with this
+1@SkyJayTheFirst Oh, no problem. It is just a bit. my pleasure
+1@Hahahahaahahshs Thanks
Nice,
+1It’s a good try. it will be even better if you can slow down the sensitivity of the controls.
+1Welcome aboard with your new concept
+1Special thanks for building this concept. Nice work
this is so much under voted
@Monarchii I have tagged you in the Private. I have 2 of them
+1Ary you the same "Chii" who build "Chii's 109" (the Me 109)
and Heinkel He-100 D - and disappear
@Monarchii Yes, I have tried this last night. It flies so well. Great job (and you will be #1 player in a short time)
+1very cool. I love the low part count builds. Since I want to build every planes in a day or two.
Sounds stupid to me at first, but ha ha ha,,, not at all. This is a cool challenge. Upvote and Spotlighted! A gyroscope is a must. Without that, it’s impossible
+1Well, the best thing is build it yourself