@DNA I know. it could spin sometime. if that happens shut down the engines and try to recover. Well, controlling a flying wing is harder than a regular plane. Besides, I don't want to add hidden wings (to make it easier to fly). I want to test the real response of a flying wing design.
If you are making Non-airplane, it's okay, but you will lose a lot of judging points "How it flies". It doesn't mean your work is bad. But the Math exam is not about how good you are in Biology. I am bringing up a challenge on FLYING staff because that is what I am excited about. That includes mosquitoes, bugs, and broomsticks as far as they fly. (no cartoon planes please)
@Ownedpilot this with no part limit is great, but the one only with limited 25 parts has a different taste since it makes you think about how to use 25 parts efficiently. that's why.
@FalcoOne No worry, it's okay for any number under 26. The maximum number of parts should be 25, but you can submit a 7-parts plane far as it flies well.
Thanks @Bryan5 & @Aviator01, sadly not much people try this out. This is a super stable plane to fly.
+2Thanks for joining. I will test it.
Very cool
+1Guys, find where is the flight computer is?
Looks awesome
This is amazing for a 25 part challenge
+5@Zaineman Lol,,,,,, Ha ha ha
nice
@WolfHunter9111 True, it is so similar -
+1@FujiwaraAutoShop No, it's Maserati
Hello @TheBananaRepublic have fun with new name
+1@DNA I know. it could spin sometime. if that happens shut down the engines and try to recover. Well, controlling a flying wing is harder than a regular plane. Besides, I don't want to add hidden wings (to make it easier to fly). I want to test the real response of a flying wing design.
form the other universe
@Ownedpilot I spotlighted that a while ago and forget to upvote. sorry.
If you are making Non-airplane, it's okay, but you will lose a lot of judging points "How it flies". It doesn't mean your work is bad. But the Math exam is not about how good you are in Biology. I am bringing up a challenge on FLYING staff because that is what I am excited about. That includes mosquitoes, bugs, and broomsticks as far as they fly. (no cartoon planes please)
@MrCOPTY do it. Maybe you can add a cockpit to this. Since I made this at the same as physical size (just half a meter smaller overall)
+1@MichavonPreussen I will let you know
@Ownedpilot this with no part limit is great, but the one only with limited 25 parts has a different taste since it makes you think about how to use 25 parts efficiently. that's why.
working cockpit in a 25-part plane? that's a real challenge Zaine. Sorry I ran out of my Spotlight again for today
Please, Pleeeeze NoEgg I can't stand to look at them. I have an Egg-plane-phoebia
@MichavonPreussen Lol,, yeah of course
@Kendog84 No, it has to fly, one of my main judging points is whether its flies well or not.
@MichavonPreussen Nice, I will definitely try it tonight
interesting
@MrCOPTY Thanks, I still remember our Copty-Win-BlueAngle which I like that plane so much
+1simple, but very cool
The last flying example of this plane was lost in a crush last year. Great that you bring this up. Adding a description will be more interesting.
+2@FalcoOne No worry, it's okay for any number under 26. The maximum number of parts should be 25, but you can submit a 7-parts plane far as it flies well.
Nice, once I did star war staff too.
+1very proportionate build
+1looks nice for 25 parts.
+1nice one
very cool, thanks for joining
@Krikkit42 Oh yes, thanks. mixup with Swedish and Swiss Lol
+2@MAHADI Yes,,, lol. i need to reduce parts,
@MAHADI thanks
@TRASHBIN84 what about OLD NAVY or GAP? Lol
@MichavonPreussen sure. That’s awesome. No need to be 25 parts. I said maximum is 25. You can go with 7 parts like I did
@AppyPappy if you make your tail longer, you will get better control, I will post you unlisted.
+1Swedish workhorse, very nice, unfortunately I can’t spotlight you
Nice
+1@Graingy lol
+1@Sergio666 thanks
+1@Observer404 answering your question at this LINK
@Fish83828 just joining my own challenge, for honoring others - of course i am not voting or winning prizes for myself. Lol.
@FalcoOne You Can add one more part if you want. Great work
Thanks @Bryan5
+1@Delphinos, you are the first person I have to follow during this challenge. Great work. Sorry I ran out of upvote for today
Nice
+1This is something outside the box thinking. Great to know about your unusual control surfaces. @Zaineman
+1