@TheSavageManZ Well yeah, I agree, those build do contain rather controversial political symbols, but they are there cause that's what they happened to look like (idk about the motorcycle tho). It's just because these controversial political symbols on the car are being used more to relfect/promote your political beliefs, compared to the other symbols, which are there as they more for historical/decorative purposes. I like your builds, but I'm just don't want you to get into trouble sometime soon if this keeps up.
@TheSavageManZ But doesn't the description literally tell you what the symbols actually are supposed to represent? The description also promotes political debate - albiet personally. The car is great, but i'm afraid that these stickers are teetering near rulebreaking. I won't say my opinion on the political matter, but even if I support/defy whatever political beliefs are being promoted on SP, it's still against the site rules to do so.
@Eiro I mean by like the stickers and perhaps some parts of the description, the car itself is fine
According to the rules,
'Please, remember that this is a game about airplanes. While we do allow off-topic conversations in the forums, if you talk about religion or politics then there is a good chance that your post will be removed. Especially if we feel that it is likely to stir up debate."
Another user shared this tip already in another post, but draw your build idea, then build from it! I do this quite a bit. Also, It's completely fine if you want to incorporate normal blocks into your build! I did that when I was first discovering how to use the fuselage block. Anyways, you should try making a prewar trainer plane, like the Bf 108 or the T-6 Texan.
I don't really think so. I think the current one is fine as it is, since the blocks blend with the cockpit. I think if they were to replace the blocks under the fuselage with a fuselage block, they may need to change the cockpit to a different type/position, or add a new one so that it blends in better. Just my two cents.
This is pretty stupid. I'm surprised they would get offended over it since the set's rendition of the aircraft looks unarmed. I may not be right, but sometime in the 90's or something the LEGO company have to deal with a similar situation from parents complaining about the blaster pieces in certain sets.
Also, the AW609 is a different design, not a civilian conversion of the V-22 btw
When I spawned this thing as an AI plane for my recent plane's screenshots I was not expecting it to start going vertical and do all sorts of things in the air before crashing in a big explosion
Clock or time teller
Btw, I have a question. How come the car looks different in one of the screenshots?
@TheSavageManZ Well yeah, I agree, those build do contain rather controversial political symbols, but they are there cause that's what they happened to look like (idk about the motorcycle tho). It's just because these controversial political symbols on the car are being used more to relfect/promote your political beliefs, compared to the other symbols, which are there as they more for historical/decorative purposes. I like your builds, but I'm just don't want you to get into trouble sometime soon if this keeps up.
+1As said below, it's a lot better to use use Discord, as the unlisted build chats can be seen by mods.
Half of a J-20
What even makes it a furry simpleplanes server
Decaffeinated.
+1@TheSavageManZ But doesn't the description literally tell you what the symbols actually are supposed to represent? The description also promotes political debate - albiet personally. The car is great, but i'm afraid that these stickers are teetering near rulebreaking. I won't say my opinion on the political matter, but even if I support/defy whatever political beliefs are being promoted on SP, it's still against the site rules to do so.
+1Did something happen to him?
Also congrats on 100 upvotes
@Eiro I mean by like the stickers and perhaps some parts of the description, the car itself is fine
+3According to the rules,
'Please, remember that this is a game about airplanes. While we do allow off-topic conversations in the forums, if you talk about religion or politics then there is a good chance that your post will be removed. Especially if we feel that it is likely to stir up debate."
Why do you mix your political beliefs with your builds? Ain't that against the rules?
@F1boss2018 Software for modelling, rendering, and animating in 3D, as well as animating in 2D
Maybe I should improve this...
The folding wings are a nice touch
@CobraHueyIndustries good
+1Hmm, it could be possible but there may only be a slim chance for that happening in the future.
Reminds me of the Berg!
Climate change
+1This could easily be a boxfuse RC EDF jet.
This bean gives me a build idea, but I'm currently occupied with building something else at the moment. Perhaps I will return to this later
This is gonna make the salty platinum users even saltier
+2I cannot type in the IP address box that opens when you hit the MP button. Has that happened to anyone?
+1I now wonder if you can do this but with the club penguin dance
why
+2WHY
Perhaps you should make the floats bigger and the plane higher off the ground?
Another user shared this tip already in another post, but draw your build idea, then build from it! I do this quite a bit. Also, It's completely fine if you want to incorporate normal blocks into your build! I did that when I was first discovering how to use the fuselage block. Anyways, you should try making a prewar trainer plane, like the Bf 108 or the T-6 Texan.
Ju-52?
@Mattangi2 oh oops I misread the 8 as 3
Thats a lot of cockpits
Are those propjets? I like how it is a mixed power trijet too.
Is 2316 the number of cockpits in this
I don't really think so. I think the current one is fine as it is, since the blocks blend with the cockpit. I think if they were to replace the blocks under the fuselage with a fuselage block, they may need to change the cockpit to a different type/position, or add a new one so that it blends in better. Just my two cents.
+1200 upvotes
Lmao nice
German Corsair: Who are you?
Bean: I'm you but simpler
+6This comment section will now get saltier than the Dead Sea
+15I'm guessing this is the Parade scheme He-51 A, like the WT one, right?
One of my favorite planes. I like canards
I wonder what the next masterpiece of Spicyninja's will be, perhaps an American Stuka
+2Heh, I have the Blue Power Jet. It's like a fictional twin seater F-35. The seats actually fit minifigs which is nice
Also I didn't know that they have a set for that scene in Indiana Jones, the aerial attack one
T-2 please
This is pretty stupid. I'm surprised they would get offended over it since the set's rendition of the aircraft looks unarmed. I may not be right, but sometime in the 90's or something the LEGO company have to deal with a similar situation from parents complaining about the blaster pieces in certain sets.
Also, the AW609 is a different design, not a civilian conversion of the V-22 btw
+1Looks like a glider of some sort to me
This is like the SP equivalent of Minecraft with RTX on
+1Someone please make this a reality
When I spawned this thing as an AI plane for my recent plane's screenshots I was not expecting it to start going vertical and do all sorts of things in the air before crashing in a big explosion
What a unique engine placement, T
One has to imagine the thought process that led to this
Heh, I draw these ufos a lot
Didn’t this whale have the largest teeth of any animal, ever?
+1