24.0k TheLatentImage Comments

  • D-21 Drone with SR-71 9.9 years ago

    @Stingray asked me to come check this out. I'm glad he did, this thing is awesome man.

  • HELP WITH BRONZE PROJECT 9.9 years ago

    @KingDeadshot yessir, that is correct.

  • HELP WITH BRONZE PROJECT 9.9 years ago

    @KingDeadshot I can't delete it, I can only remove it from public view. Unless someone comes to the page directly. Unlike typical unlisted posts ones that came down the ticket still retain comments. But, you won't see this post listed under his profile. Only the devs can delete planes.

  • General Purpose Bomb (update) 9.9 years ago

    These are really well done.

  • HELP WITH BRONZE PROJECT 9.9 years ago

    This needs to be on the forums. This part of the website is reserved for posting of designs. I'm going to remove this post. You can repost in the forums.

  • 4x4 9.9 years ago

    @Sirstupid I think it would be fitting if you removed your upvote. He doesn't deserve it, not on this design.

  • axle 9.9 years ago

    @Timmy123429 no worries man, this is getting removed as well.

  • 4x4 9.9 years ago

    You need to give credit to puredeath and the other guy that you took this from. You did not build this from scratch. I know that for a fact. You're new here so I'll let you know how this community works. You don't steal designs from other users, and you give credit where credit is due. You don't circumvent the successor system either. You need to have a little more respect for the people that put their time and effort into creating these mechanical works. I'm going to remove this design, and ask that you follow the rules and upload your own content. Consider this an unofficial warning. And that's just because I'm feeling generous. The fact that you straight up lied when called out on this is rather irritating to me.

  • Separate engine for rcn control 9.9 years ago

    @sirtribesman yeah, that's been brought up before in a different thread. Someone made a mod for that though. I haven't tried it out but the pics looked pretty good.

  • Separate engine for rcn control 9.9 years ago

    @xXrocketdummyXx I'm not sure how that applies to, or solves the issue behind the creation of this thread. Also, helicopter propellers are achievable through xml modification as demonstrated by a number of individuals in the community.

  • Separate engine for rcn control 9.9 years ago

    @Wahoo12 drop an upvote, that along with a comment help a bunch.

  • Cessna 421 9.9 years ago

    If it's not yours then who's is it, and why isn't it a successor?

  • Separate engine for rcn control 9.9 years ago

    @AeroEngineering yeah, I thought about that the other day. Like small diameter super thrust engines for missles. You should create a thread for that, I'd vote it.

  • Separate engine for rcn control 9.9 years ago

    @AeroEngineering thanks buddy

  • Supermanoeverable P-51 Mustang (500mph+ Top Speed) 9.9 years ago

    What did you change aside from the prop? Also, you shouldn't say that this is the first plane that you've made when you didn't actually make it. Try uploading some of your own original material. You'll probably get a better response.

  • Apache AH-64 Green slime 9.9 years ago

    @BritishNarwhal yes, I and the other two moderators as well as the developers have the ability to remove posts and comments. We will do so if we feel that they are offensive or inappropriate, as well as copied designs.

  • Apache AH-64 Green slime 9.9 years ago

    @BritishNarwhal I moderate the website. I make sure that the users and the material all fall under a set of guidelines. Anything that doesn't gets removed.

  • Separate engine for rcn control 9.9 years ago

    @AeroEngineering toss an upvote on there if you would so that this thing has a better chance of staying at the top.

  • Apache AH-64 Green slime 9.9 years ago

    @BritishNarwhal I'm not being rude, or asking him to take it down. Just curious as to what the thought process behind it is.

  • Apache AH-64 Green slime 9.9 years ago

    @BritishNarwhal I'm not being rude, or asking him to take it down. Just curious as to what the thought process behind it is.

  • Apache AH-64 Green slime 9.9 years ago

    @BritishNarwhal Because the website is flooded with simple recolors that don't need to be there. I have to moderate all of this stuff, and I could do without sifting through countless uploads that could just as well be private or saved.

  • Online Racing? 9.9 years ago

    Hey buddy, you should search the forums a bit before you make a new post. Checking the highest rated shows a thread about multiplayer.

  • Red Hawk 9.9 years ago

    @8Mazde8 be sure to drop me an upvote on there if you enjoyed it. The fake internet points make me feel warm and fuzzy.

  • Apache AH-64 Green slime 9.9 years ago

    Out of curiosity, why upload another users design of a different color? Why not make those changes and then save it to your editor or publish privately instead of publicly publishing another users work of a different color?

  • Sub-assemblies 9.9 years ago

    It is a way to save single edited pieces or a group of edited pieces. Stick some, pieces together, then click your part manipulation tool, then click the box that looks like a few blocks next to each other. Then name and save. Then check your sub assemblies. Your newly saved piece will be there.

  • Red Hawk 9.9 years ago

    @HotAndSpicy did you try the flight instructions listed in the description?

  • Titan 9.9 years ago

    Out if curiosity, why would you repost this if all you did was change the color? You could have saved it in your editor, rather than repost a different color of someone else's work.

  • Seahawk-5 9.9 years ago

    This thing is great, clean hud you have in the cockpit.

  • Experiments with folding wings and short take-off 9.9 years ago

    Woah, this is very cool man.

  • MiniSub v1.5 9.9 years ago

    This thing is great. I really enjoy those torpedos. And the barge roped to the back is awesome man.

  • sex machine 9.9 years ago

    @Johawks1976 lol, also I just noticed that your comment was 4 months ago. My apologies. This design was just recently reported.

  • sex machine 9.9 years ago

    @Johawks1976 please watch your language. We discourage foul language due to the fact that people of all ages play this game. Same reason that this is getting design is getting removed.

  • Game crashing 9.9 years ago

    @AndrewGarrison It doesn't seem to matter what my quality settings are. It's a recent development too. I suppose I'll have to try the reinstall route.

  • hover board 9.9 years ago

    Don't copy other users planes. Consider this an unofficial warning. Please post your own content.

  • Multiplayer Ideas 9.9 years ago

    @RailfanEthan no need to apologize. Just search the forums pretty well for an existing thread before you post a new one. One of the most popular threads is about multiplayer. Go ahead and take this one down when you get a chance.

  • Spirit of St. Louis (Replica) 9.9 years ago

    @RABpilot alright buddy, very cool. Thank you very much.

  • Micro F102 - Microplane Challenge new entry 9.9 years ago

    @Stingray sure thing buddy, no problem. Yeah, I clicked on the notification and it took me to the simpleplanes home page. I thought your profile was gone! But... it came back.

  • Aircroft ww1 plane 9.9 years ago

    Again, not bad buddy. It is certainly air worthy.

  • aircroft 221-87 Aires 9.9 years ago

    @aircroft awesome, Iook forward to checking that out. Tag me when you upload it and I'll come check it out.

  • Multiplayer Ideas 9.9 years ago

    You should look at some of the other threads and post in there. This type of thread has already been posted numerous times.

  • aircroft 221-87 Aires 9.9 years ago

    Not bad, really similar to the other jet liner you posted. It is very stable though, good work with that. You should consider some air brakes to aid in landing. Not a bad build though.

  • WE NEED FUEL DETACH BUG BACK 9.9 years ago

    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/I5WH3o/Nifty-mods

    It is two blocks in one, so you'll have to make sure it's in the spot that you want. Once it's placed you'll have to throw away the two pieces and pull a new one out of your sub assemblies.

  • WE NEED FUEL DETACH BUG BACK 9.9 years ago

    @Bakon I know for a fact that his works well. I'll see if I can find it.

  • F-X 1 Spirit (armed) 9.9 years ago

    Outstanding, I like everything about this. Superb handling and balance, great look, the sights are awesome. Excellent build man.

  • Game crashing 9.9 years ago

    @Meawk I'm current on the android system update. Thanks for the suggestion though.

  • TA-170 Ausf. G CBA 9.9 years ago

    Wow, this thing is awesome. It looks great, and I really enjoy the handling. Fully armed as well. Excellent build man.

  • B-76 Wyrven Light Bomber/Heavy Fighter 9.9 years ago

    Nice man, I like the way this flies. I like the little details too.

  • E-wing (Star Wars Challenge) 9.9 years ago

    @RABpilot Hey, thanks a lot man. I really appreciate that.

  • WE NEED FUEL DETACH BUG BACK 9.9 years ago

    Nickasarusrex has a fuel cell mod that is nearly unlimited but has a pretty low weight. I think it's pretty useful.

  • ADF-01 FALKEN mk3 9.9 years ago

    This is another users unaltered design. Don't repost unchanged designs by other users. Please upload your own content.