ah yes, proposing something for war thunder in an SP forum, totally a big brain move, why bother going to the WT forums to propose something when you can do it in the SP forums
@LunarEclipseSP inconceptions about the SU-57
The well known RCS of the "SU-57" was actually from patent of the T-50 prototype. No one really knows what the actual RCS of the SU-57 is, we can predict that it is actually lower. FUN FACT, the production models of the SU-57 look darker compared to the T-50 due to the RAM coating it has, its also more smoother and uses actual flushed fasteners like found on the F-35 and F-22.
.
(yes I have changed my ways and I am actually defending the SU-57)
@asapSCOTT also one thing to add, the wing drop tanks' nose and rear are too short, you should make it a bit longer
@asapSCOTT make more high quality builds
@asapSCOTT goated with the sauce
rhino my beloved
@GuyWhoBuildStuff this is the fucking forums, not a social media platform, all he do is fucking post the most pointless shit and it clogs up the forum
dude ur not old enough for this site
@Graingy you're weeping at an audience of deaf ears
ah yes, proposing something for war thunder in an SP forum, totally a big brain move, why bother going to the WT forums to propose something when you can do it in the SP forums
the front wheels are a bit small but overall a solid build
+1@kaidenmcateer that's the E/A-18G
@DynamicHorizon this ain't youtube
you should use the AIM-120C since its more optimized for stealth fighters due to having smaller or clipped fins
@areyousure1999 nah ur just in the old version, the newer version of SP fixed this bug
me when I'm a truck that has misaligned panels and not properly attached brake pedal
reveal it, I dare you :)
+2you are in the older version
the harrier only had 6 wing pylons
+1the dude didnt properly credit people fym saved
these are just R-27s
+1@Bertelemeus " J-35 won't shoot down shit except airliners and half a century old planes" so you have something to back up your bold claim or what?
@JAGDPANZER131
the J-15T is not a 2 seater
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Ukraine even uses the same rack for their SU-27 and MIG-29 just to carry the AGM-88
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 no? thats literally how the F/A-18 attaches the AGM-88 because that is its adaptor rack, the rack is made for the AGM-88.
@2Papi2Chulo no probs
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 like i give a damn if its the exact same loadout, im just showing the AGM-88 rail attachment
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 the AGM-88 is in the same pylon?
the AGM-88 HARMs arent attached like that, its like this
those are infernos, not guardians
eden cheese
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 can you like mind your business? if you're pissed off at me then don't like talk to me
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 its only uncalled if you dont like it
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 me when no humor
sorry i dont install chinese malwares
+3@MonsNotTheMonster i mean, you already got detailed wings and custom missiles, nothin's stoppin ye
what if, landing gear wells
im gonna go violent, what must you make the inbred version of one of my goat
@Uisnenonokankit MIG-29K
+1daily updates on a user no one even cares
+5you did not serve the front gear any justice
why are there no weapons bays?
@ToeTips i dont play bias no more, i defend both the J-20, J-35, F-35, SU-57 and so on
+2@LunarEclipseSP inconceptions about the SU-57
+3The well known RCS of the "SU-57" was actually from patent of the T-50 prototype. No one really knows what the actual RCS of the SU-57 is, we can predict that it is actually lower. FUN FACT, the production models of the SU-57 look darker compared to the T-50 due to the RAM coating it has, its also more smoother and uses actual flushed fasteners like found on the F-35 and F-22.
.
(yes I have changed my ways and I am actually defending the SU-57)
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 like i give a shit what the purpose was, im just here criticising becase he really does not use any blueprints
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 point of what?
the horizontal stabilisers are too small and the nose is still too short
somehow, you're alive
+1why is there pitot tube?
unless that's suppose to be the refueling probe, which is located on the right wing
you not gonna share what map that is?
now make the oxygen destroyer missile