Hmmm, You have the movements right. I have the Trigger as AC-1 and the side button as AC-2. The top two buttons besides the thumb stick I use for the throttle, and the ones below that I use for the landing gear and changing camera views. I would say give it a day and practice with it, youll be able to fly your planes a lot smoother (And mine too)
@CapitalTechnologies Ok, yours is 20mph faster. But the take off speed it lower. And the 133 still turns better. This is still a good air craft though.
@phoenixzis i dont judge by numbers, i judge by creation and dear, you cant say that mine arnt that detailed when yours arn't that sparkly either. If you hadn't noticed, Ill tell you what I do. I innovate. I couldnt give two shits about detail, they are my creations and I have pumped out so many different types that I often have to scroll down my list just to remember what i have mad. Yeah I know they are a bit plane, but I make up for that in the different kinda of ways I can make them. And at the scale I build, its a bit hard to put much detail into them.
After extensive testing, I have come to the conclusion that the Bf-133-B is a better aircraft for the job. It's faster, and more maneuverable. BUT- The B1 version of your fighter (after increasing the engine power and size of the prop) could turn as well as the Bf-133, and had a decent speed of 680mph, tot he Bf's 740mph.
@AgDynamics Im had tried to do that but I simply dont like it. I know my planes are simple and unnoticeable but I do research into them to see what would be the best way to make them at my scale.
@NovaTopaz The carrier is a revision of a older carrier, I had been thinking of using fuselages which I have for the newest flying carrier. This one I just used what I had to test out the fighter launch system.
Dang you beat me to this aircraft
Nice and simple, Im thinking of starting to work at this scale.
This doesnt have 100 parts though
Ill try it.
@Acer500 I did that on purpose to make it look mooooreee organic?
@NSStancik
You can use mine, check out my list
You can use mine, check out my list
@Acer500 Try 50% while pulling up, and after gaining speed throttle up more.
@Acer500 Really? It doesnt do that for me.
@Acer500 this is just an escort version, the main carrier is in the works.
@Acer500 thank you
@Acer500 no problem
Hmmm, You have the movements right. I have the Trigger as AC-1 and the side button as AC-2. The top two buttons besides the thumb stick I use for the throttle, and the ones below that I use for the landing gear and changing camera views. I would say give it a day and practice with it, youll be able to fly your planes a lot smoother (And mine too)
@phoenixzis Me too. I will put in some more detail to my planes.
@Solarisaircraft The Graf-Zeppelin 5, with the Bf-133 fighters. And thank you.
@phoenixzis I am really sorry
@Solarisaircraft There are two in my list. Check them out.
Wow this is nice!
Mind if I use the missiles?
@CapitalTechnologies Ok, yours is 20mph faster. But the take off speed it lower. And the 133 still turns better. This is still a good air craft though.
Alright, Ill test it out.
Ive decided to start out on the ocean fleet.
@phoenixzis Your planes are fine.
@phoenixzis Im sorry, dealing with stress while typing.
@phoenixzis i dont judge by numbers, i judge by creation and dear, you cant say that mine arnt that detailed when yours arn't that sparkly either. If you hadn't noticed, Ill tell you what I do. I innovate. I couldnt give two shits about detail, they are my creations and I have pumped out so many different types that I often have to scroll down my list just to remember what i have mad. Yeah I know they are a bit plane, but I make up for that in the different kinda of ways I can make them. And at the scale I build, its a bit hard to put much detail into them.
@phoenixzis gee thanks for the speech...
@NovaTopaz There you go.
@Snipe121314 Thanks.
@NovaTopaz I like to pace myself abit when it comes to huge projects.
Wow decent design. It does need some work though.
Yep, it would be good for my carriers.
@DeezDucks They are military aircraft though, what will i paint them? Bright pink?
After extensive testing, I have come to the conclusion that the Bf-133-B is a better aircraft for the job. It's faster, and more maneuverable. BUT- The B1 version of your fighter (after increasing the engine power and size of the prop) could turn as well as the Bf-133, and had a decent speed of 680mph, tot he Bf's 740mph.
@ronyseptian17 I do sometimes, I just rather not since adding bits onto the plane creates drag.
@CapitalTechnologies Very well, the test start now.
@CapitalTechnologies Ohhh neat
@CapitalTechnologies This is the plane you are competing with.
@CapitalTechnologies I will have to do some research to see if this is better than the Bf-133-C that I was planning for the carrier.
This is actually to scale of my aircraft, very cool!
@CapitalTechnologies Alright, she will be on the new Uber Graf Zeppelin 9.
@CapitalTechnologies Thats fine, ill see what I can do with them in the afternoon.
@AgDynamics Im had tried to do that but I simply dont like it. I know my planes are simple and unnoticeable but I do research into them to see what would be the best way to make them at my scale.
THanks everyone.
@CapitalTechnologies Sure, The fighters there are about the fastest one prop I got thoguh.
@AgDynamics Not like you have to worry about it, your so good at this while Im complete shite.
@AgDynamics I just want to know if my planes are any good.
@NovaTopaz Also, I like to keep my planes to scale of the cockpit, that's why they are all simple yet have the same scale.
@NovaTopaz The carrier is a revision of a older carrier, I had been thinking of using fuselages which I have for the newest flying carrier. This one I just used what I had to test out the fighter launch system.
@NovaTopaz Im talking about the big projects, like the carriers. And Most of my fights are simple yet complicated.